I-AI ne-Human Creativity Ingatholakala Kuhle - Uma I-AI Ayikwazanga Ukuthatha I-Thing Yenza Emuva

Izinzuzo ziye, uzothola imizuzu emininzi ezidlulile.

I-AI iye yenza into enikeza i-Hayao Miyazaki ukujabulela imibala enhle kunazo zonke izidakamizwa ze-sonke: i-AI iye yenza i-magic ye-Studio Ghibli's style ye-animation - ngaphandle kwe-human hand eyodwa ehlanganisiwe.

NgoLwesithathu, imiphumela eyenziwe nge-AI emkhakheni ye-Ghibli ye-esthetic emangalisayo etholakala i-social media, okuphuma ama-millions of views and shares. Ezinye amapostile ebonakalayo "AI Ghibli" art ku-X no-Instagram zihlanganisa ezingaphezu kuka-100,000 i-likes, futhi abasebenzisi zithembisa ukuthi izibonelelo ze-machine-made zihambisana ne-real thing.

Ngokuvamile, isivivinyo yayo kwaba kakhulu, wena umongameli we-CEO yebhizinisi wahlanganyela abantu abasebenzisa umkhiqizo yebhizinisi.

But not everyone is impressed.

Artists are calling it theft.Umbhali wabhalasoulless.Umbhali we-Miyazaki? Umbhali we-movie wabhala umculo we-AI "umthombo we-life ngokwemvelo", ngakho-ke, nangokuthi akuyona amazwana, ungenza ukuthi uyazi ukuthi lokhu.

I-Studio Ghibli ibekwe isakhiwo se-animation esifundeni esifundeni esifundeni, esifundeni esifundeni - ifilimu esifundeni esifundeni esifundeni kuya ku-100,000 amaphrojekthi eyenziwe ngabantu zangempela.

I-AI, Ngaphandle kwalokho, i-AI iye iye yenza yonke into enhle e-Internet futhi iye yenza inguqulo yayo yayo ngokugqithisileyo eminyakeni.

Futhi manje siphinde isixazululo se-moral.

Yini lokhu ukuhlangabezana kubaluleke ngisho abacwaningi abacwaningi?

Kuyinto akuyona kuphela ku-Ghibli; kuyinto malunga nenkinga lokuthuthukiswa ngokugcwele.

If AI can absorb and replicate decades of artistic evolution in an instant, it raises a question that affects everyone: who owns creativity? If an algorithm can profit from the collective work of generations, what does that mean for human innovation in any field?

I-AI vs. umkhakha we-human art isibuyekeza kuphela abacwaningi-ukubuyekezwa kwengu-value ye-humane originality. Njengoba i-AI iyatholakala kakhulu futhi imithombo enhle kakhulu, le umkhakha uhamba ngaphezu kwe-animation.

Ngokuba uma amazwe angakwazi ukukhuthaza isixazululo esisodwa, kungekho lwezobuchwepheshe ukukhuthaza zonke izixazululo ezinye. Futhi lokhu akuyona ingozi okungenani esithakazelisayo kumadoda njengoba tunamazi.

Umbala we-content

ikhaya
1. I-Mechanism ye-generative AI
ikhaya
2. I-economics ye-generative AI
ikhaya
3. I-grey zone ye-legality
ikhaya
4. Izakhiwo zofilosofi
ikhaya
5. I-Ouroboros
ikhaya

1. the mechanism of generative AI

Okwangoku, abantu zihlanganisa ukuthi lokhu kuyinto ingozi ngokumelene nenkhiqizo noma elizwi lokufundisa, futhi abaningi baye akuyona ukuthi i-AI inikeza.

Ngiyaxolisa lokhu.

a. what even is generative AI?

Ukukhetha ukuthi u-artist. Uyazi amadolobha ekuthuthukiseni style eyingqayizivele-ngokuthi ufakele amadolobha amantombazana, amakhasimende ebizwa ngempumelelo ezivela ku-Studio Ghibli movie.

Ngosuku, umugqa we-AI edluliselwe ku-millions of images, kuhlanganise ngezithombe ezivela kakhulu kwelinye, uqala ukujabulisa izithombe ngama-dreamy efanayo, isikhwama esebenzayo.

Indlela yenza lokhu?

I-Generative AI akuyona i-magic. It iyimodeli ye-machine-learning eyenziwe ukukhiqiza izinto ezintsha - izithombe, umbhalo, umculo - ngokusekelwe okuhlolwa.

I-diagram eyenziwe ngaphezulu kubandakanya indlela yokusebenza kwe-Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). It kuqala nge-input vector enhle, okuyinto i-generator model isetshenziselwa ukukhiqiza isibonelo esifundeni.

Ngemuva kwalokho, umzekelo owenziwe, kanye nomkhiqizo owenziwe, iyathunyelwe imodeli we-discriminator, okuyinto isixazulule ukuthi i-real noma i-fake. I-discriminator isebenza i-binary classification (i-real noma i-fake), futhi amabili amamodeli akufundisa kusuka ku-process - i-generator iyatholakala kahle ekutholeni, futhi i-discriminator iyatholakala kahle ekutholeni i-fake.

Ngesikhathi eside, le-back-and-forward ivumela imiphumela ye-generator kakhulu futhi kakhulu. Hlola lokho njengama-athletes amabili abacindezela.

Kuyinto idatha esisodwa esisodwa esekelwe amamodeli efana ne-Stable Diffusion, i-MidJourney, ne-DALL·E. Lezi zindlela ze-AI akufaka futhi zihlanganisa izithombe njenge-mapping eningi ye-artwork ebutholwe. Ngaphandle kwalokho, zihlanganisa njenge-hyper-advanced pattern-recognition-machines, ukufundisa kusuka ku-millions (okanye ama-billions) yezithombe.

Ngakho-ke uma ungenza i-AI ukuvelisa "i-portrait yam, kodwa i-Studio Ghibli style", akuyona isithombe se-Ghibli esidala futhi ivela ku-screen yakho.“New”Ukusebenzisa okucwanele ngokuvamile mayelana nokwenza umbhalo ukubukeka "Ghibli-like." Ngakho-ke kungase ukuguqulwa umbhalo ngaphandle kokuphathelene umbhalo eyodwa.

Kodwa ngaphambi kokufika ku-ethics, thina ucwaninga kanjani le nkqubo yokufunda kwe-AI.

b. the big difference between AI and human artists

Ngokusho lokuqala, abasebenzi be-AI nama-human artists akufundisa ngokusebenzisa i-“observing” art eyenziwe. Ngakho-ke abacwaningi be-AI-generated art uzama,"Ngcono, abacwaningi abasebenzi abacwaningi abacwaningi. Yini i-AI iyiphi na ingxenye?"

Ngiya ku-difference:

Umbhali we-human usebenzisa ukufundisa, kodwa bese usebenzisa isisindo, ukubuyekeza, kanye nenkinga lwethu ukuvelisa into entsha. Bona bakwazi ukufundisa ubucwebe we-animation ye-Hayao Miyazaki, kodwachooseizakhiwo ezivela, izakhiwo ezivela, izakhiwo ezivela, izakhiwo ezivela, izakhiwo ezivela, izakhiwo ezivela, izakhiwo ezivela, izakhiwo ezivela.

AI, on the other hand, doesn’t chooseYini. It has no judgment, no intent, no creativity. It kuphelaremixesNgokusekelwe ku-probability. It ikhiqiza izithombe ngokubandakanyamathematical predictions—not emotions, not ideas, not personal vision.

Okuvela ku-my real question:

c. so is AI “stealing” or “learning”?

Kuyintothe heart of the controversy. Solving this question is solving the entire debate.

Umbhali wabheka ukuthi ama-AI amamodeli abafundisiwe emkhakheni ebhalisiwe - ngaphandle kokuhlinzwa - zihlanganisa ekhukhwini okusheshayo kwe-digital plagiarism.

Nangona i-AI ayithombe isithombe esithile kusuka ku-Spirited Away, akukwazi ukukhiqiza umculo we-Ghibli-style ngokweneneuma akuyona amabili amabhayisikili amabhayisikili amabhayisikili amabhayisikili.Yini, ngoba kubo, akuyona.

Ngaphandle kwalokho, abacwaningi be-AI abacwaningi ukuthi bonke abacwaningi abacwaningi nge-observing abacwaningi amanye. Akukho abacwaningi abacwaningi abacwaningi.

Uma umntu angakwazi ukufundisa i-Ghibli kanye nokuthuthukisa isakhiwo esifanayo, ngakho-ke i-AI ayikwazi ukwenza okuhle?

Yini kweliUkukhangisaUma i-AI ayikwazi ukucubungula isikhwama eyodwa, kodwa kuphelaUkuhlobisa and Ukubuyekezwapatterns – njengoba abacwaningi abesifazane?

Futhi lokhu lapho abantu baqala ukujabulela ngamunye kwi-internet.

2. the economics of generative AI

Uma idatha yokulungisa kwe-AI isekelwe ku-artwork eyenziwe ngabantu, ngakho-ke abacwaningi akuyona? Ukuphendula kunezinto ezintathu ezingenalutho zebhizinisi le-AI: izindleko, ushintsho, kanye nezinhlangano zomthetho.

Let me make this super clear:

ikhaya

Ukubhalisa idatha ayidlulile ukhetho.

Paying for data is never an option.

a. the cost problem

NgiyaziinsaneUmthamo we-inthanethi yokusebenza kahle. Sitholela ama-billions of images. If AI companies had tolicense every single pieceUkubuyekezwa kwezinto zokusebenza kwezobuchwepheshe, bakhula ngaphambi kokuvumela imikhiqizo enye.

Let’s do some rough math: If an AI model was trained on even 100 million pieces of artwork and had to pay an average of $5 per image, a fairly below-average commission, that’s a $500 million cost upfront in cold hard cash just for licensing.

Ngokuvamile, i-Stabil Diffusion, isibonelo, isetshenziselwa i-LAION-5B dataset, okuyinto iqukethe ezingaphezu kuka-5 billion imifanekiso-tekst amabili.1Ngena ngemvume

I-Midjourney's ukuqeqeshwa idatha kubandakanya isithombe se-16,000 abacwaningi abacwaningi abacwaningi asetshenziselwa ukuthuthukiswa kwezixhobo zokusebenza kwe-AI art-generating.2]

Ngakho-ke, thina ucwaningo malunga ama-billions of dollars ngokuhambisana nezindleko. Kwi-industry okuyinto kunezinguquko ama-billions of dollars.

Ngakho, ngokuvamile, ayikho ye-one of these was paid by any means.

For companies like OpenAI, Stability AI, and MidJourney, paying wasn’t even a question—it was never financially viable to pay artists at scale. So they didn’t. And it’s a thousand times more cost-effective to fight the legal battles, which they have a high chance of winning, than to pay.

Futhi lokhu kuqinisekisa ukuthi abacwaningi babuyela ukudayisa umsebenzi yabo, okuyinto abaninzi akuyona.

b. the competitive pressure

Ngokuqala ngo-2025, kunezinto ze-67,200 zezinkampani ezisebenzayo ze-AI. Kuyinto eningi. Uma ubeka abantu ze-67,200 emzimbeni futhi zithembisa, ama-historic angama- "I-Great Street Battle of 2025" futhi zihlanganisa izinsuku ezinguquko. Ngakho-ke, ukuhambelana kuyinto enhle.

Ngakho-ke, ngisho uma inkampani ye-AI isixazulule ukuhlangabezana kwesakhiwo se-artwork ngempumelelo, kungathanda ngokushesha emzimbeni abalandeli abalandeli.

Thina ukhohlisa i-cost ngexesha elinye futhi ucabanga ukuthi I-Company A ibhizinisi idatha yayo yokulungisa futhi inesigodi kuphela ukufinyelela ku-10 million imifanekiso. Nokho, I-Company B ibhizinisi wonke inthanethi futhi ibhizinisi ku-billion imifanekiso.

Kwi-AI emakethe, okwenziwe nge-innovation eyenziwe ngenyanga, i-licensing ye-ethical kuyinto isizukulwane sokuthengisa. Amathengisi bakwazi ukuthuthukiswa okusheshayo futhi amabhizinisi asebenzayo isisombululo se-ethical inesibophezele abalandeli abalandeli abalandeli abalandeli.

ikhaya

So they do with the optimal path: scrape now, deal with lawsuits later.

ikhaya

Ngakho-ke bafuna indlela efanelekayo: scrape manje, ukuhlangabezana nezinkinga ngemva.

AI companies took the path of least resistance. Rather than spend years negotiating licensing deals, they scraped the data, built their models, and decided to deal with lawsuits later.

Futhi manje? Kuyinto okufanayo. Izikhwama zihlanganisa abacwaningi, amakhompyutha ze-stock photo, futhi ngisho izikhwama zihlanganisa amakhompyutha ze-AI usebenzisa izinto ezinobuchwepheshe ngaphandle kokuhlinzwa.

Izinqumo ezithile ziye zitholele amabhizinisi ze-AI, kodwa uhlelo lwe-legal isebenza ngokushesha-ngaphansi kwejubane lapho i-AI isebenza.

So the reality is that these companies calculated the risk and decided it was worth it. The damage is already done, and now the legal battles will shape the future of AI-generated content.

3. the grey area of legality

Ngaphandle kwemikhiqizo kanye nokuhlanganiswa, ezinye izimo ezengeziwe zomthetho zihlanganisa ukuthi abacwaningi abalandelwa ngenxa ye-AI training data.

One major reason is the perception of data as a public good. Many AI companies operate under the assumption that anything publicly accessible on the internet is fair game for scraping, similar to how Google indexes web pages without compensating content creators.

Nangona izinsizakalo ze-copyright zihlanganisa izinsizakalo ze-artwork, ukuvikelwa kwangaphakathi, ikakhulukazi lapho amamodeli we-AI zihlanganisa idatha ngaphandle kokufaka ngqo. Lokhu kwenza indawo ye-legal grey lapho amabhizinisi angakwazi ukhangela ukuthi akuyona nje "ukufunda" idatha ngaphandle kokufaka.

Izinkampani ze-AI zisebenzise nokuhlukana kwezinkomba zomthetho ezivela ukusetshenziswa kwe-transformative.[3] Bhalisa ukuthi amamodeli yabo ayikhompyutha noma ibhalisele izakhi zokusebenza zokusebenza kwezobuchwepheshe, kodwa akhiqize izakhiwo ezintsha ngokugcwele ezisekelwe izakhiwo ezaziwa.

Ukulungiswa okuhle, okuqukethwe ngokuvamileUkusetshenziswa okwenziweIzinsizakalo ze-AI, ezisetshenziswe kumakhasimende ze-tech ezingaphezu kwama-field ukuze zibonele i-data scraping emikhulu. Njengoba impahla eyenziwe yi-AI akuyona ngokuqondile nezinsizakalo zokuqala, ukuhlolwa kokuphendula kwegama kubalulekile futhi kunzima isikhathi.

Another factor is the lack of collective bargaining power among visual artists. Unlike musicians, who have organizations like ASCAP to protect their rights, or stock photographers who license work through platforms like Shutterstock, independent artists don’t have a unified system to negotiate fair compensation.

This made it easier for AI companies to exploit their work without significant facing industry-wide pushback.

Okokuqala, kukhona ingxaki ye-first-mover advantage. Umkhakha we-AI wahluka ngokushesha kunazo ku-legal frameworks, ngokulandelana ne-Classic Silicon Valley approach ye-"move fast and break things."

Ngokuqhathanisa izivakashi kanye nezinsizakalo ezivela ekubunjweni, i-inthanethi eyenziwe nge-AI iye ivela emakethe, okwenza kungcono kakhulu ukuhlangabezana abacwaningi ngokushesha.

Njengoba kubangelwa emaphaketheni, amazwe amaningi zihlanganisa ukuthi iziphumo zokusebenza zomthetho ziye zibonakalayo kuqhathaniswa nezindleko zokwakha amamodeli zokuthuthukiswa kwe-AI ngokushesha.

In the end, AI companies saw an economic opportunity, exploited legal and structural gaps, and prioritized rapid growth over fairness—betting that any legal consequences would come too late to stop them.

4. philosophical frameworks

It kungabangela ukuhlangabezana ukuhlangabezana ukuthi isakhiwo yakho kuyinto esifundeni esifundeni. Ngaphandle kwalokho, uzothola abacwaningi bakho abacwaningi abacwaningi amabhizinisi be-AI ngenxa yokuthintela izakhiwo zabo. Ngaphandle kwalokho, ungazi ukuthi kungcono ngokuthandana ne-AI amabhizinisi ngokuthintela kwabo. Ngakho kanjani ufike lokhu?

Ngiyacinga okuhle kwezi zimo, sicela ukunikeza amabili amabili amabhulogi amabhulogi amandla.

• I-John Rawls uyavumelana nezinkampani ze-AI vs. abacwaningi futhi uyavuma, "Yah, lokhu kuyinto ukuphazamiseka kwamandla."
• U-Karl Marx uyazi ukuthi imisebenzi yama-artists iyatholakala futhi etholakala ngaphandle kokuphendula futhi wathi, "Yep, lokhu kuyinto ukuxazulula."
• Immanuel Kant wathi, "Ndiya, lokho akuvamile."
• U-Jeremy Bentham noJohn Stuart Mill wathi, "Ukwenza lokhu ngokwenene ukwandisa ukuhambisa, noma thina kuphela ukwandisa ukuphila?"

Ngezinye, lezi zincwadi zihlanganisa ukuthi indlela yamanje yokuthuthukiswa kwe-AI-generated art kuyinto ethically problematic futhi engatholakali.

a. the power imbalance: a Rawlsian view

The rise of AI-generated art presents a profound ethical dilemma:

who controls creativity,

and who benefits from it?

For centuries, artists have earned a living through their skills, developing unique styles, and contributing to cultural progress. But with the advent of AI models trained on vast datasets of human-made art—often without consent—the balance of power has shifted.

AI companies claim their technology democratizes creativity, making artistic production faster, cheaper, and more accessible. But at what cost? Artists find themselves in a paradox where their work, once a means of personal expression and economic survival, has been repurposed to fuel an industry that excludes them from its profits.

Their styles are mimicked, their creative choices are reduced to algorithmic patterns, and their labor is absorbed into training data without permission or compensation.

Ukusuka ku-John Rawls' Theory of Justice4I-Rawls inikeza ukuthi kuphela izwe ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye ziye zibe.

Ingabe uyavumelana nenkqubo lapho umsebenzi wakho yokwenza ingatholakala ngaphandle kokusekela uma ungazi ukuthi uzothola umbhali noma umphakeli we-AI?

Ukusabela kubalulekile: Akukho umntu owaziwa akutholile uhlelo elidlulele amandla yayo yokuhweba. Nokho, lokhu kuyinto elilodwa emhlabeni I-AI art corporations zibonisa-one lapho abacwaningi ayikho umkhakha, akukho ukhuseleko lwekhwalithi, futhi ayikho ikhono ukukhuthaza idatha mass.

Ngokusho kweRawlsian, uhlelo olufanelekayo uyaziqhathanisa kakhulu. It uyaziqhathanisa:

• Explicit consent from artists before their work is used.
• Ukubuyekezwa okuhlobene okuhlobisa imithombo yayo kuma-AI models.
• Legal safeguards prevent corporations from unilaterally dictating the terms of creative ownership.
ikhaya

Ngaphandle kwalokho, amazwe ze-AI zitholela inkinga lokusebenza esiyinhlobene, ukusebenzisa umsebenzi wama-artists ngoba zitholela, futhi akuyona ukuthi abathengi be-individual akufanele izindlela zokuphendula kwabo, futhi ngakho-ke zitholela elandelayo nge-model enikezela kuphela abo emaphezulu, futhi zitholela abacwaningi ngempumelelo emkhakheni kanye nophuhliso.

Rawls’ theory reminds us that fairness isn’t about what benefits the most powerful—it’s about ensuring no group is disproportionately disadvantaged. A world where AI replaces human artists without their consent is not just unfair.

Kuyinto enhle ngokuvamile.

b. the impact on artists’ livelihoods: Marxist critique

Karl Marx’s concept of alienation describes how workers in capitalist societies become increasingly disconnected from the value they create.[5Ngama-capitalist ezivamile, abasebenzi akhiqize izinsiza kanye nezinsizakalo kodwa akhiqize izindlela zokukhiqiza, ukuthatha kuphela ingxenye yesikhathi esithakazelisayo.

Kodwa-ke, nge-rise ye-AI-generated art, lokhu ukuxhumana kufinyelela ekupheleni - okuyinto kungenziwa kuphela ngokuthihyper-alienationNgathi

Umbhali akuyona kuphela ongaphakeme noma ongaphakeme; zithunyelwe ngokuvamile emkhakheni yebhizinisi. I-creative labor yayo isithunyelwa, i-copyright yahlukaniswe, futhi i-AI amamodeli eyenziwe ezintsha okuzenzakalelayo ngaphandle kokuthunyelwe kwabo, credit, noma ukuguqulwa.

Unlike factory workers who at least receive wages for their time, artists whose work is absorbed into AI datasets receive nothing.

Oku kuthathanisa ukuhlaziywa kwesimo se-creative economy - ukusuka ku-exploitative system lapho abantu abanikeze okungenani kusuka ku-skills zabo kuya ku-exploitative system.fully extractive industryIzinkampani ze-AI zibonisa ukusebenza kwezobuchwepheshe ezidlulileyo kumkhakha ebonakalayo, ukuqinisekisa ukuthi abacwaningi abacwaningi abacwaningi - abasebenzi abacwaningi - akuyona inkinobho ye-economy ebonakalayo.

Umkhakha wahluka emzimbeni lapho umqondo wabantu wahlukile futhi wahlukile emzimbeni lapho imikhiqizo emzimbeni wahlukaniswa futhi i-monetized ngempumelelo.

Ngokusho kwe-Marxist, lokhu akuyona ingozi kuphela kumakhasimende ngamakhasimende ngamakhasimende ngamakhasimende ngamakhasimende ngamakhasimende ngamakhasimende.inevitable collapse point for the entire system. When creative workers lose economic agency, art is no longer dictated by artistic vision but by the relentless pursuit of profit.

Umkhakha wahlanganyela embonini we-innovation ne-expression ku-mass-produced, i-content algorithmic e-optimized ngenxa ye-engagement metric, engaphezu kwe-artistic integrity.

Imiphumela ye:

ikhaya
• I-Devaluation ye-art ngokuvamile. Uma i-AI inokufinyelela inkinobho ye-artistic ngaphandle kokusebenzisana kwe-umuntu, i-originality ivimbele. Abasebenzisi akuvimbele nge-low-cost, i-content e-mass-produced, futhi ukwahlukanisa phakathi kwe-authentic artistic expression ne-AI mimicry ivimbele.
ikhaya
• A race to the bottom. As AI-generated content becomes the norm, human artists find themselves in an impossible competition with machines that can produce infinite works at near-zero cost. Art becomes commodified at an unprecedented scale, with economic rewards concentrated entirely in the hands of AI corporations.
• The death of artistic labor. If creative careers become financially unsustainable, fewer individuals will pursue artistic professions. The long-term result? The loss of human-driven art forms, replaced by algorithmic imitations optimized for profit rather than cultural or emotional depth.

Marx would argue that the contradiction here is unsustainable. Capitalism depends on labor to function—but when AI models replace the labor force entirely, even capitalism itself risks self-destruction. If AI-generated art continues on its current trajectory, the system will not just exploit artists—it will erase themNgathi

Futhi ngokwenza lokhu, kungenzeka ukuba ngempumelelo umkhakha kuze kube lapho umuntu - noma umbhali noma umbhali - akuyona inkinobho.

c. the illusion of “inspiration”: a Kantian perspective

In the age of AI-generated content, a fundamental ethical question arises: Should an artist’s work be used without their permission to train AI models?

Ukuphumelela okusheshayo kwe-AI emkhakheni wokudala kunikeza inqubo lapho inani elikhulu lwezobuchwepheshe, umbhalo, futhi umculo zithunyelwe ku-Internet futhi zithunyelwe ku-machine learning systems-ukuvamile ngaphandle kokuhambisana nomkhiqizi wokuqala. Lokhu kubonisa imibuzo embi mayelana nokuqukethwe kwe-intellectual property, integrity artistic, kanye ne-value ye-creativity yabantu emkhakheni lapho imishini ingasebenza imiklamo ngaphandle kwe-attribution.

I-AI amabhizinisi ngokuvamile ibheka le nqubo ngokuvamile ngokuvumela ukuthi amamodeli yabo "ukufunda" ngokufanayo ne-umuntu - ngokuvimbela ulwazi, ukwamukela amamodeli, nokuvimbela imibuzo amasha. Kodwa kusukela kwisikhokelo se-Kantian yethiki, le analogy iyatholakala kakhulu. Umntu ufundisa ngokusebenzisa ukuhlolwa okuhlobene, ukubuyekezwa, nokuxhumana.

An AI model, on the other hand, ingests everything at scale—indiscriminately, without consent, and without an understanding of the ethical boundaries that govern human learning.

I-Immanuel Kant impendulo ye-catalogical ibonise ukuthi singatholakala kuphela ngokuvumelana nezinsizakalo ezivamile – okungenani ukuthi uma wonke umuntu uyihambisana nesisekelo esifanayo, kufanele akufanele ahlukene.

Ngokusetshenziselwa i-AI, le ncwadi inikeza isizinda esiyingqayizivele: Ingaba ama-AI amabhizinisi uyavumele ukuba imiphumela yayo yokusebenza - imiklamo yayo, ucwaningo, futhi idatha yama-proprietary - iyathunyelwe futhi ifakwe kwinkqubo eyodwa ye-AI ngaphandle kokuhlinzwa kwabo?

Uma bakwazi ukufumana okuhlobisa okuhlobene, ngakho-ke ngokufilosofi kaKant, indlela yayo yamanje yokusebenzisa umsebenzi wama-artists ngaphandle kokuhambisana akufanele ukuhlolwa kokucindezeleka.

ikhaya

I-Ironic, siye sinazi isibopho. Uma i-DeepSeek, inkampani ye-AI eTshayina, ilawulwa ukuba isebenzisa imodeli ye-OpenAI ukuqeqesha i-chatbot yayo yayo, i-OpenAI ilawula ngempumelelo. Le nqubo, ebizwa ngokuthi "i-destillation", kuhlanganise ukuthatha imithombo kusuka ku-AI engaphezulu futhi isetshenziselwa ukuphucula uhlelo olandelayo.

While common in the industry, OpenAI condemned this act as a violation of its terms of service—an unacceptable misuse of its intellectual property.

I-Ironic, siye sinazi isibopho. Uma i-DeepSeek, inkampani ye-AI eTshayina, ilawulwa ukuba isebenzisa imodeli ye-OpenAI ukuqeqesha i-chatbot yayo yayo, i-OpenAI ilawula ngempumelelo. Le nqubo, ebizwa ngokuthi "i-destillation", kuhlanganise ukuthatha imithombo kusuka ku-AI engaphezulu futhi isetshenziselwa ukuphucula uhlelo olandelayo.

Nangona asebenzayo kwebhizinisi, i-OpenAI wathatha okuhloswe kwebhizinisi yayo - ukusetshenziswa okungagunyaziwe kwebhizinisi yayo yobuchwepheshe.

Ethical consistency demands that we hold AI companies to the same standard they would expect for themselves. If they wouldn’t want their intellectual labor to be harvested and repurposed without acknowledgment, then they cannot justify doing the same to artists.

d. exploitation at scale: a utilitarian dilemma

Izinkampani ze-AI zibonisa ukuthi amamodeli zayo zibonisa bonke - art engabizi, ngokushesha, futhi engatholakali kakhulu. Ngokuhambisana ne-business point of view, oku kuhlukanisa kakhulu: impahla eningi okwakhiwa nge-cost ephakeme. Kodwa kukhona isibuyekezo esikhulu se-ethical - kungenzeka ukuthi lo mthumela iyahlukile emibi?

I-utilitarianism, njenge-Jeremy Bentham noJohn Stuart Mill, kuyinto elula:

ikhaya

maximize happiness and minimize suffering.

ikhaya

maximize happiness and minimize suffering.

Ukusebenza kunokwenzeka kuphela uma inikeza izinzuzo ezinhle kakhulu kunazo zonke.

AI companies claim they’re democratizing art and expanding creativity. But look closer, and the harm starts to pile up—not just for artists, but for everyone.

Izixhobo zithunyelwe emhlabeni wonke. I-AI ayidlulisa kuphela ama-painters kanye nama-illustrators; kuyathunyelwa ku-writing, umculo, umklamo, nokungaphakathi nokuvakashwa. Uma ama-business angakwazi ukufumana umsebenzi eyenziwe yi-AI emizuzu eminyakeni ngama-fraction ye-cost, abasebenzi we-creative ne-knowledge-based zithunyelwe izinzuzo.

I-CEO ye-Shopify, u-Tobi Lütke, ivumela ukuthi abasebenzi zabo kufanele zibonise umsebenzi engatholakala nge-AI ngaphambi kokubiza ukunemba abantu ngaphezulu.

Over time, it’s not just artists struggling—anyone trying to stand out online, from small business owners to independent writers, faces an uphill battle.

I-inthanethi, umculo, kanye ne-scripting enhle kunezinto ezinhle ze-inthanethi, emoyeni, kanye ne-perspectives ezibonisa into enhle. I-AI ayifanele ukujabulela, ukujabulela, noma ukujabulela; inikeza kuphela imisindo.

Njengoba i-inthanethi eyenziwe nge-AI iboniswe, ukukhiqizwa kwamakhemikhali ingangena ngokuvamile, i-optimized yokusebenza kunoma ububanzi. Qinisekisa inthanethi lapho umculo, ama-movies, namabhuku, bese amabhuku asebenza ngokuvamile - ngoba kukhona.

Uma i-AI iyahambisana nokuhlanganisa ukufundisa abantu, yini kubaluleke kumadoda abalandeli abalandeli abalandeli abalandeli abalandeli abalandeli abalandeli abalandeli?

Apprenticeships, entry-level jobs, and freelance gigs start to vanish, making it nearly impossible for newcomers to break in.

Ngaphandle kokuphumelela kwelizwe, ukunakekelwa, noma indlela yokufinyelela, izimboni ephelele zingahlukanisa, ukugcina izindlela ezincinane zezinhlayiyana ezijulile ukuhlola umthamo yabo yokufinyelela.

Ukukhula okusheshayo kwe-AI akuyona kuphela ingozi yobuciko - ingozi wonke. Uma ubudala womuntu akuyona engaphansi, izimboni ephelele zihlukile, izimboni zihlukile, futhi indawo yethu yobugcisa ingozi emoyeni we-soulless, i-machine-made content.

Uma abantu abalandeli ngenkathi amabhizinisi kanye nomthengi amancane abalandeli izinzuzo, ke i-scale tips ku-injustice.

Uma i-AI art ikakhulukazi uqinisa i-big-tech kanye nokuvimbela umsebenzi kanye nokuxhumana okwakhiwa, i-utilitarianism akhiwa ebomvu. I-efficiency kuphela akuyona isixazululo se-moral.

The real test for AI companies is this: Do their innovations actually make society better for everyone? If not, then the cost is too high.

5.I-Ouroboros

WazeOuroborosKuyinto i-paradox—izinto ezihlabathi ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela ngokuvimbela.

Yenza nathi ukhohlisa: kungase kube lihlale ngokwenene, uma kunikezela kuphela? Ingaba ukuguqulwa kunazo ku-self-destruction, noma kuyinto isizukulwane? I-Ouroboros kuyinto i-symbol ye-hunger endless - isakhi esizukulwane esizukile.

Uma umculo we-AI-generated uye kwelanga lapho ivimbele abacwaningi amabili, i-Ouroboros inesibopho – ukuphazamiseka i-ecosystem efanayo. I-AI ufundisa nge-training ku-art eyenziwe ngabantu; Uma abacwaningi abacwaningi abavela, i-pools ye-fresh, umsebenzi esezingeni eliphezulu ivimbele.

Ngaphandle kwe-creativity entsha yokuhlanza, i-AI inesibophelela ukuxhaswa, ukuxhaswa okuqhubekayo izidakamizwa zayo zayo zayo zayo zayo ngokushesha ngokunciphisa originality. Ngokufinyelela ukuguqulwa kwama-artists, kungenzeka ekupheleni kwe-hunger itself.

For all the hype around AI-generated art, there’s one inescapable truth: AI is only as good as the human-made art it learns from.Ngaphandle kwe-artists, i-AI ayikho nawo.

Okwangoku, amamodeli ze-AI eziphilayo zithembisa ngenxa yokufundiswa kwelanga lokukhipha womuntu - ama-billions of paintings, illustrations, and digital artworks eyenziwe e-internet.

Kodwa kanjani lapho impahla eyenziwe nge-AI uqala ukunqanda isikhwama se-image eyenziwe? Yini lapho amamodeli angu-AI emkhakheni akufanele akufundiswe, hhayi ku-masterpieces yabantu, kodwa ku-AI copies ye-AI copies?

Umphumela? Ukulinganiswa okuqhubekayo kodwa okuqhubekayo kwekhwalithi.

And AI companies know this.

Thina ukwazi ukuthi zinezidingo zokuthengisa okushisayo, izinga okusezingeni eliphezulu kwe-man-made art ukuze zithembise imodeli yabo. Kodwa uma i-AI-generated art ivimbela i-internet, ukuguqulwa kokuthengisa umsebenzi womuntu, lapho lokhu yokuthengisa okusheshayo kuqala?

Uma umkhakha owenziwe nge-AI ukhuthaza umbhali we-human out of business, i-AI ngokuvamile ithatha idatha esezingeni eliphezulu ukuze ufunde. Kule isikhathi, amazwe zihlanganisa izinketho ezimbili:

ikhaya
1. I-Collapse – Njengoba amamodeli abalandeli futhi ama-investors bakwazi ukunciphisa i-return, amabhizinisi we-AI abalandeli.
2. I-Double Down on Exploitation - Ukuze ukugcina umgangatho, amabhizinisi we-AI angakwazi ukufinyelela kwama-scraping emangalisayo noma emangalisayo, noma i-forced artists ekukhiqizeni abasebenzi abalandeli ngokunciphisa ukunciphisa.
ikhaya

Noma kunjalo, imodeli elandelayo ayikho. I-AI ibonelela ku-creativity yabantu, kodwa uma ivimbele kakhulu ngaphandle kokutholela, kungaba njestarve itself out of existence.

I-AI ne-human creativity ingatholakala ngokugcwele -YiniI-AI akufanele ukutya into enikeze.

AI’s biggest selling point right now is also the thing that could kill it: fewer artists, fewer original ideas, fewer creative jobs, and a slow but steady drain on the well of human expression.

Uma i-AI inikeza ngokushesha kakhulu emangalisini womuntu ngaphandle kokuthuthukisa, inesibopho sokukhula ekhukhwini yayo.

conclusion

Uma i-AI ithatha umkhakha ngamanani, ngokukhawuleza, futhi "ngcono kakhulu", inani le-studios iyaziqhathanisa umbhali we-human? Ukulungiselela amaningi uyaziqhathanisa umbhali omtsha ngaphandle kokufunda ama-bestsellers ku-algorithm? Ukulungiselela ama-childers angafuna ukufundisa ukuchithwa lapho i-app inokukwazi ukwenza lokhu eminyakeni?

Uma i-AI art ibonelela, akukwazi ukuthi kungekho ngenxa yokubaNgconoKuyinto ngoba kulula futhi mahhala. I-Comfort has a way to erase things.

Njengesithombe ze-telephone. Njengesithombe ze-handwritten. Njengesithombe se-Lost e-Hand-Drawed World, lapho wonke inkinobho lithunyelwe lapho umuntu owenziwecared.

Ngiyazi ukuthi ama-AI amabhizinisi asebenza okuzenzakalelayo ngenxa yobumfihlo. Zibonisa lokhu ngokufanayo ne-drug dealers zithunyelwe ama-samples ezamahala abesifazane.

Drug dealers, who are protected by great economic resources and legal loopholes.

Kuyinto elilandelayo elandelayo etholakalayo, futhi akukho isigaba se-Black Mirror akuyona enhle kakhulu.

Hlola inguqulo yokuqala:I-AI, i-Ghibli, futhi indlela yokufunda yonke into ngokuzimelaUkuze izincazelo ezithile futhi ukuxhumana ngqo nombhali.