paint-brush
When Can a PAGA Plaintiff Lose Standing?by@legalpdf
205 reads

When Can a PAGA Plaintiff Lose Standing?

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesFebruary 3rd, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Uber and amicus curiae United States Chamber of Commerce suggest that a PAGA plaintiff subject to an arbitration agreement breaches that agreement by filing suit in court. This is part 14 of 15 in HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law are automatically placed in the public domain.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - When Can a PAGA Plaintiff Lose Standing?
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

ERIK ADOLPH vs. Uber Court Filing, retrieved on July 17, 2023, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 14 of 15.

G.

Finally, Uber and amicus curiae United States Chamber of Commerce suggest that a PAGA plaintiff subject to an arbitration agreement breaches that agreement by filing suit in court. But if a defendant believes arbitration is required, it is “[t]he party seeking arbitration [that] bears the burden of proving the existence of an arbitration agreement” in court. (Pinnacle Museum Tower Assn. v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC (2012) 55 Cal.4th 223, 236.)


And even where a plaintiff concedes the applicability of an arbitration agreement, the plaintiff does not breach the agreement by alleging in a complaint that one or more violations were committed against the plaintiff for the purpose of meeting PAGA’s standing requirements.


Several amici curiae have also argued that we should narrow the statute’s standing requirements in order to curb alleged abuses of PAGA. These arguments are best directed to the Legislature, which may amend the statute to limit PAGA enforcement if it chooses.


Our task is to give effect to the statute as we find it. Under the statute, a plaintiff who files a PAGA action with individual and non-individual claims does not lose standing to litigate the non-individual claims in court simply because the individual claims have been ordered to arbitration.


Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case S274671 retrieved on September 22, 2023, from courts.ca.gov is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.