Being great developer has nothing to do with passing interview, because most interviews are about weird questions, like what are your weaknesses and question about the legacy feature of a language which nobody hasn’t used in 10 years. Nevertheless, we have to play the game by the rules.
What is the output in the console?
The answer is 30.25
. The trick is, if you put parentheses with arguments immediately after function declaration, that will be considered a function call.
What is the output in the console?
The answer is 1
. The trick is that due to duplicate declaration of b as variable and parameter, it gets resolved as parameter. Since we call our function only with 1
parameter – 1 + []
equals '1'
. Pay attention that type of returned value is string.
What is the output in the console?
Output will be [10], 10, [10], 10
. The key is to understand that in case of variable and parameter names war – parameter wins. There are a few other tricks here. arguments
is always an array and in this case it is [10]
. ...f
is a way to group the rest of the function parameters into named array, in this case all the parameters are resulting into [10]
.
What is the output in the console?
There are two tricks here. First — executing code using function scope — (function(){}())
pattern. Second – exploiting global/local scope overlap. Both foo
and bar
defined in global scope. Function redefines foo
in local scope, so global foo
is not changed, when bar
gets reassigned to 1
. Finally, 1 + 10 = 11
.
What is the output in the console?
This will print out undefined
and 10
rather than 5
and 10
since JavaScript always moves variable declarations (not initializations) to the top of the scope, making the code equivalent to:
What is the output in the console?
This will print out undefined
and number
rather than number
and number
since var a = b = 3
is equivalent to b = 3; var a = b;
. Making b
global variable. What is usage of chained notation is not recommended by many styles to avoid accidental global variable declarations.
What is the output in the console?
This will print out object
and undefined
. Javascript has automatic semicolon insertion and one of them is inserting semicolon after return statement, making second function equal to return;
, thus returning undefined
.
What is the output in the console?
Most likely it will output 0.30000000000000004
, false
, and true
. Number in JS are represented as double-precision 64-bit binary format IEEE 754 values. Thus there are rounding errors, as well as there is Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER
, after which Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER === Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 1
equals to true
.
What is the output in the console?
This will print out 333
, not 111
. When setting an object property, JavaScript will implicitly stringify the parameter value. In this case, since b
and c
are both objects, they will both be converted to "[object Object]"
. As a result, a[b]
anda[c]
are both equivalent to a["[object Object]"]
and can be used interchangeably. Thus, setting or referencing a[c]
is precisely the same as setting or referencing a[b]
.
What is the output in the console?
This will print out 5, 5, 5, 5, 5
and 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
.
setTimeout
function will be called after whole cycle is executed because of JavaScript event queue. Variables declared using var
are global by default – meaning i
would be equal to 5
after the end of a cycle. Since all setTimeout functions are called after the cycle, the all would print 5
.
Output of second loop even more bizarre. In ECMA 6 specification, the specified behaviour is that in for(let i;;){}
i
gets a new binding for every iteration of the loop. Essentially each closure inside a loop gets a different instance of i
What is the output in the console?
This will print out true
and false
. There are two tricks here. In Javascript relational operators evaluated from left to right, false equals 0
, and true equals 1
for number comparisons. First expression after first step is true < 2
=> 1 < 2
=> true
, and second is true > 1
=> 1 > 1
=> false
.
Javascript has many interview traps, so unless you prepare for them or have memorized ECMA specifications you are likely to fail at an interview at some point.
Originally published at ylv.io on February 10, 2019.