Refactoring 020 - Transform Static Functions

Written by mcsee | Published 2024/12/15
Tech Story Tags: programming | clean-code | software-development | technology | refactoring | code-smells | javascript | typescript

TLDRReplace static functions with object interactions.via the TL;DR App

Kill Static, Revive Objects

TL;DR: Replace static functions with object interactions.

Problems Addressed

Related Code Smells

https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-iv-7sc3w8n

https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-iv-7sc3w8n

https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-v-evj3zs9

Steps

  1. Identify static methods used in your code.
  2. Replace static methods with instance methods.
  3. Pass dependencies explicitly through constructors or method parameters.
  4. Refactor clients to interact with objects instead of static functions.

Sample Code

Before

class CharacterUtils {
    static createOrpheus() {
        return { name: "Orpheus", role: "Musician" };
    }

    static createEurydice() {
        return { name: "Eurydice", role: "Wanderer" };
    }
    
    static lookBack(character) {
      if (character.name === "Orpheus") {
        return "Orpheus looks back and loses Eurydice.";
    } else if (character.name === "Eurydice") {
        return "Eurydice follows Orpheus in silence.";
    }
       return "Unknown character.";
  }
}

const orpheus = CharacterUtils.createOrpheus();
const eurydice = CharacterUtils.createEurydice();

After

// 1. Identify static methods used in your code.
// 2. Replace static methods with instance methods.
// 3. Pass dependencies explicitly through
// constructors or method parameters.

class Character {
    constructor(name, role, lookBackBehavior) {
        this.name = name;
        this.role = role;
        this.lookBackBehavior = lookBackBehavior;
    }

    lookBack() {
        return this.lookBackBehavior(this);
    }
}

// 4. Refactor clients to interact with objects 
// instead of static functions.
const orpheusLookBack = (character) =>
    "Orpheus looks back and loses Eurydice.";
const eurydiceLookBack = (character) =>
    "Eurydice follows Orpheus in silence.";

const orpheus = new Character("Orpheus", "Musician", orpheusLookBack);
const eurydice = new Character("Eurydice", "Wanderer", eurydiceLookBack);

Type

  • [x]Semi-Automatic

You can make step-by-step replacements.

Safety

This refactoring is generally safe, but you should test your changes thoroughly.

Ensure no other parts of your code depend on the static methods you replace.

Why is the Code Better?

Your code is easier to test because you can replace dependencies during testing.

Objects encapsulate behavior, improving cohesion and reducing protocol overloading.

You remove hidden global dependencies, making the code clearer and easier to understand.

Refactor with AI

Without Proper Instructions

With Specific Instructions

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

Claude

Claude

Perplexity

Perplexity

Copilot

Copilot

Gemini

Gemini

Tags

  • Cohesion

Related Refactorings

https://hackernoon.com/refactoring-018-how-to-replace-a-singleton?embedable=true

https://maximilianocontieri.com/refactoring-007-extract-class?embedable=true

  • Replace Global Variable with Dependency Injection

See also

https://hackernoon.com/coupling-the-one-and-only-software-designing-problem-9z5a321h?embedable=true

Credits

Image by Menno van der Krift from Pixabay


This article is part of the Refactoring Series.


Written by mcsee | I’m a sr software engineer specialized in Clean Code, Design and TDD Book "Clean Code Cookbook" 500+ articles written
Published by HackerNoon on 2024/12/15