OpenAI Presents Legal Standard in NYT Dismissal Argument

Written by legalpdf | Published 2024/03/06
Tech Story Tags: openai-vs-new-york-times | new-york-times-lawsuit | openai-new-york-times-lawsuit | openai-nyt-lawsuit-response | nyt-generative-ai-lawsuit | openai-lawsuit | lawsuits-against-openai | nyt-openai-lawsuit-details

TLDROpenAI wants portions of the NYT's lawsuit against the company be dismissed, arguing the paper presented misleading evidence to the court.via the TL;DR App

The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 9 of 15.

III. LEGAL STANDARD

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). “[C]onclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as fact[s]” do not suffice. Arcesium, LLC v. Advent Software, Inc., No. 20-cv-04389, 2021 WL 1225446, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2021).

Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.

This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.


Written by legalpdf | Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.
Published by HackerNoon on 2024/03/06