Here's Why Language Is Outdated

Written by 3l4d | Published 2025/04/30
Tech Story Tags: communication | language-evolution | social-progress | human-communication | language | linguistics | humanity | society

TLDRThe article critiques the limitations of traditional language in capturing the complexity of human experience, particularly in the context of modern, digital communication. It argues that language, as a system of signs, often fails to convey the full spectrum of meaning, emotion, and nuance, leading to misunderstandings and a sense of disconnection. The piece suggests that our reliance on outdated linguistic structures hinders authentic expression and proposes a reevaluation of how we communicate to better align with contemporary realities.via the TL;DR App

We humans live in a world we are ill-equipped for.

We are “tooled” in terms of evolution for the Stone Age, but the modern environment we live in is more complex than a cave.

Few examples -

We crave sugar, salt, and fat because it was hard to obtain.

We have cognitive biases that are survival-optimized to a danger-rich environment.

We prefer spending as little energy as possible since finding more meant risk.

Our language is one of these prehistoric tools - geared for transferring simple ideas from one human to another - in a time when the ideas formed in neighboring brains were similar in scope and shape.

Today’s world makes these prehistoric tools not only ill-fitting but also taxing on the individual, group, and society in general. If we take the previous examples -

Cravings cause health hazards in a society of abundance and economic gain from the manipulation of these cravings (i.e., by many companies in the food industry).

People make poor financial and other statistically-based decisions (which are also being exploited by some profit-seeking organizations).

People are bad at choosing what to spend time on and about physical activities (and too - are being exploited by entertainment - including social, gaming, news - and similar industries).

Language is no different.

We pay in efficiency - spend vast quantities of time on transferring ideas.

We pay in results - intentions miscommunicated cause personal and sometimes national harm.

We are manipulated by others - to buy, to conform, to support, to believe.

We use “hacks” to work around some language limitations - adding analogies and metaphors to compress ideas, using non-verbal communication (gestures, visuals, sounds). But they are not perfect in results and have diminishing returns on the time spent conjuring them.

This requires a solution.

When one is found - its fruits will impact everything. It will transform what and how we do and who we are as a species.

The research towards it must discuss the problem, the solution’s impact - humanistic and economic, draw inspiration from existing and historical types of communication, linguistics, look into arts, slang, humor, machine, technology and intelligence, brain operations, animal communication, non-animate data transfer (genes, atoms, particles), cultures and more.

What it is not is researching communication channels. It is about content - data that is being transferred. It is also not research into finding a new “language” or improving on existing ones. This has been attempted and failed many times in the past 200 years (as an example - Ithkuil is a sort of “solution” using current tools).

We do not need “a faster horse.” We need a Transporter Room.


Written by 3l4d | Father and husband, tech entrepreneur, outdoors-lovin'-ultra-runner. Challenged by and concerned about communication
Published by HackerNoon on 2025/04/30