DOE v. Github (original complaint) Court Filing, retrieved on November 3, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is the table of links with all parts.
Case Number: 3:22-cv-06823-KAW
Plaintiff: DOE
Defendant: Github
Presiding Judge: Jon S Tigar
Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Filing Date: November 3, 2022
Location: US District Court for the Northern District of California
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW: A BRAVE NEW WORLD OF SOFTWARE PIRACY
IV. PARTIES
VI. CLASS ALLEGATIONS
- A. Class Definitions
- B. Numerosity
- C. Typicality
- D. Commonality & Predominance
- E. Adequacy
- F. Other Class Considerations
VII. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
- A. Introduction
- B. Codex Outputs Copyrighted Materials Without Following the Terms of the Applicable Licenses
- C. Copilot Outputs Copyrighted Materials Without Following the Terms of the Applicable Licenses
- D. Codex and Copilot Were Trained on Copyrighted Materials Offered Under Licenses
- E. Copilot Was Launched Despite Its Propensity for Producing Unlawful Outputs
- F. Open-Source Licenses Began to Appear in the Early 1990s
- G. Microsoft Has a History of Flouting Open-Source License Requirements
- H. GitHub Was Designed to Cater to Open-Source Projects
- I. OpenAI Is Intertwined with Microsoft and GitHub
- J. Conclusion of Factual Allegations
VIII. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
- COUNT I
- COUNT II
- COUNT III
- COUNT IV
- COUNT V
- COUNT VI
- COUNT VII
- COUNT VIII
- COUNT IX
- COUNT X
- COUNT XI
- COUNT XII
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW retrieved on September 5, 2023, from Storage.Courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.