I did a Twitter poll to see what people think is the best approach to developing new products/services. The poll has been featured among people with startup or entrepreneurial interests. After looking at the results, I was surprised.
To be honest, I was expecting a 65ā70% for the āpeople buy progressā approach. So far from the results! Right now, itās 47% for āpeople buy progressā.Ā
After reflecting on it, Iāve come to two potential reasons for these results. On the one hand, probably not everybody understands what I really mean with the question. Maybe I did not explained myself adequately, and I am using theory language like āJobs To Be Doneā.
On the other hand, Iāve thought that this result makes sense. 95% of new products fail, and often itās because they donāt solve any problem, which is derived from the āPeople buy techā mindset.
Technology is not a problem solver. HumansĀ are.
š„ According to HBS professor Clayton Christensen, over 30,000 new products are introduced every year, and 95 percent fail.Ā
šĀ Often the reasonĀ is that our products are not solving a real problem. Or what is the same, the product is not helping to progress somebody while performing a job to bo done. We tend to think that the new technology itself is what people need. We are wrong.Ā We need things that make us progress with our Jobs-To-Be-Done (or tasks if you want).
Builder behavior vs problem solverĀ behavior
šļø Unsurprisingly, the poll results are aligned with the ābuilder behaviorā mindset Iāve seen during my 12 years in the tech sector and mentoring entrepreneurs. This behavior starts building āthingsā, and thinks about technology as a purpose, instead of trying to solve a problem with the help of the technology.Ā
š”Alternatively, a āproblem-solverā approach, designing products and services that solve real-world problems for an audience with the help of technology, is one of the keys to successful products.
Wants vs Needs. Customers donāt know what theyĀ really need.
"People donāt want to buy a quarter-inch drill. They want a quarter-inch hole!"
I love this Theodore Levitt quote, professor at Harvard Business School, to easily illustrate what does mean that people donāt buy technology. As we may notice,Ā most of the time, people donāt ask what we need. We need a quarter-inch hole, but we want a quarter-inch drill.
What do peopleĀ buy?
Buying technology:Ā Buying the quarter-inch drill without the need of a quarter-inch hole. Maybe you buy it because you like it for home decorationā¦.in which case you are not buying technology, you are buying progress with your home decoration job.
Buying progress:Ā Buying the drill because you are going to use it to make a quarter-inch holeā¦or whatever, but you have a more profound Job To Be Done to solve.
š¤ So, would you buy the drill if itās not solving any problem for you?
Key takeawaysĀ
āļø Donāt build technology as a purpose. Leverage it to solve problems that make the people think theyāre progressing.
āļø Try to be a problem solver instead of a builder.
āļø Look for needs underlying wants. Talk with your audience as much as you can to understand the underlying needs and problems to solve.
āļø Use the Jobs-To-Be-Done you are solving (or how are you making your audience progress) in your marketing copy.
Do you buy technology, or do you buy progress?
Thanks for reading my very first article on Hacker Noon! I hope our thoughts can help with your entrepreneurial and leadership journey.
š„ Get my 6-lessons FREE video course on Product Marketing Strategy to grow your SaaS/tech productĀ here