Transformation af CSV-filer til grafer med LLM'er: En trin-for-trin guide

Hvordan klarer LLM'er sig, når de forsøger at oprette grafer fra flade CSV-filer?

En stor del af mit job er at forbedre brugernes oplevelse med Neo4j. Ofte er det en vigtig udfordring for brugerne at få data ind i Neo4j og modellere dem effektivt, især i de tidlige dage. Selvom den indledende datamodel er vigtig og kræver overvejelse, kan den let omstruktureres for at forbedre ydeevnen, efterhånden som datastørrelsen eller antallet af brugere vokser.

Så som en udfordring for mig selv tænkte jeg, at jeg ville se, om en LLM kunne hjælpe med den indledende datamodel. Om ikke andet, ville det demonstrere, hvordan tingene hænger sammen og give brugeren nogle hurtige resultater, de kan vise andre.

Intuitivt ved jeg, at datamodellering er en iterativ proces, og at visse LLM'er let kan distraheres af store mængder data, så dette gav en god mulighed for at bruge LangGraph til at arbejde i cyklusser gennem dataene.

Lad os dykke ned i de tilskyndelser, der fik det til at ske.

Grundlæggende om grafmodellering

Graph Data Modeling Fundamentals-kurset på GraphAcademy guider dig gennem det grundlæggende i modellering af data i en graf, men som første gennemgang bruger jeg følgende tommelfingerregler:

• Navneord bliver etiketter - De beskriver den ting , som knudepunktet repræsenterer.
• Verber bliver relationstyper - De beskriver, hvordan ting hænger sammen.
• Alt andet bliver til egenskaber (især adverbier) — Du har et navn og kan køre i en grå bil.

Verber kan også være noder; du kan være glad for at vide, at en person har bestilt et produkt, men den grundlæggende model tillader dig ikke at vide, hvor og hvornår produktet blev bestilt. I dette tilfælde bliver orden en ny node i modellen.

Jeg er sikker på, at dette kunne destilleres til en prompt for at skabe en nul-skuds tilgang til grafdatamodellering.

En iterativ tilgang

Jeg forsøgte dette kort for et par måneder siden og fandt ud af, at den model, jeg brugte, let blev distraheret, når jeg havde at gøre med større skemaer, og meddelelserne nåede ret hurtigt LLM's token-grænser.

Jeg tænkte, at jeg ville prøve en iterativ tilgang denne gang ved at tage nøglerne én ad gangen. Dette bør hjælpe med at undgå distraktion, fordi LLM kun behøver at overveje et emne ad gangen.

Den endelige tilgang brugte følgende trin:

1. Indlæs CSV-filen i en Pandas-dataramme.
2. Analyser hver kolonne i CSV'en og føj den til en datamodel løst baseret på JSON-skema.
3. Identificer og tilføj manglende unikke id'er for hver enhed.
4. Gennemgå datamodellen for nøjagtighed.
5. Generer Cypher-sætninger for at importere noderne og relationerne.
6. Generer de unikke begrænsninger, der understøtter importerklæringerne.
7. Opret begrænsningerne og kør importen.

Dataene

Jeg tog et hurtigt kig på Kaggle for et interessant datasæt . Datasættet, der skilte sig ud, var Spotify Most Streamed Songs .

 import pandas as pd csv_file = '/Users/adam/projects/datamodeller/data/spotify/spotify-most-streamed-songs.csv' df = pd.read_csv(csv_file) df.head() track_name artist(s)_name artist_count released_year released_month released_day in_spotify_playlists in_spotify_charts streams in_apple_playlists … key mode danceability_% valence_% energy_% acousticness_% instrumentalness_% liveness_% speechiness_% cover_url 0 Seven (feat. Latto) (Explicit Ver.) Latto, Jung Kook 2 2023 7 14 553 147 141381703 43 … B Major 80 89 83 31 0 8 4 Not Found 1 LALA Myke Towers 1 2023 3 23 1474 48 133716286 48 … C# Major 71 61 74 7 0 10 4 https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b2730656d5… 2 vampire Olivia Rodrigo 1 2023 6 30 1397 113 140003974 94 … F Major 51 32 53 17 0 31 6 https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b273e85259… 3 Cruel Summer Taylor Swift 1 2019 8 23 7858 100 800840817 116 … A Major 55 58 72 11 0 11 15 https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b273e787cf… 4 WHERE SHE GOES Bad Bunny 1 2023 5 18 3133 50 303236322 84 … A Minor 65 23 80 14 63 11 6 https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b273ab5c9c…

5 rækker × 25 kolonner

Det er relativt enkelt, men jeg kan med det samme se, at der burde være relationer mellem numre og artister.

Der er også udfordringer med datarenhed at overvinde, i form af kolonnenavne og kunstnere, der er kommaseparerede værdier i kolonnen artist(s)_name.

At vælge en LLM

Jeg ønskede virkelig at bruge en lokal LLM til dette, men jeg fandt tidligt ud af, at Llama 3 ikke ville skære den. Hvis du er i tvivl, så fald tilbage på OpenAI:

 from langchain_core.prompts import PromptTemplate from langchain_core.pydantic_v1 import BaseModel, Field from typing import List from langchain_core.output_parsers import JsonOutputParser from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o")

Oprettelse af en datamodel

Jeg brugte et forkortet sæt modelleringsinstruktioner til at oprette datamodelleringsprompten. Jeg var nødt til at konstruere prompten et par gange for at få et ensartet output.

Zero-shot-eksemplet fungerede relativt godt, men jeg fandt ud af, at outputtet var inkonsekvent. At definere et struktureret output til at holde JSON-output hjalp virkelig:

 class JSONSchemaSpecification(BaseModel): notes: str = Field(description="Any notes or comments about the schema") jsonschema: str = Field(description="A JSON array of JSON schema specifications that describe the entities in the data model")

Få-Shot Eksempel Output

Selve JSON var også inkonsekvent, så jeg endte med at definere et skema baseret på datasættet med filmanbefalinger.

Eksempel output:

 example_output = [ dict( title="Person", type="object", description="Node", properties=[ dict(name="name", column_name="person_name", type="string", description="The name of the person", examples=["Tom Hanks"]), dict(name="date_of_birth", column_name="person_dob", type="date", description="The date of birth for the person", examples=["1987-06-05"]), dict(name="id", column_name="person_name, date_of_birth", type="string", description="The ID is a combination of name and date of birth to ensure uniqueness", examples=["tom-hanks-1987-06-05"]), ], ), dict( title="Director", type="object", description="Node", properties=[ dict(name="name", column_name="director_names", type="string", description="The name of the directors. Split values in column by a comma", examples=["Francis Ford Coppola"]), ], ), dict( title="Movie", type="object", description="Node", properties=[ dict(name="title", column_name="title", type="string", description="The title of the movie", examples=["Toy Story"]), dict(name="released", column_name="released", type="integer", description="The year the movie was released", examples=["1990"]), ], ), dict( title="ACTED_IN", type="object", description="Relationship", properties=[ dict(name="_from", column_name="od", type="string", description="Person found by the `id`. The ID is a combination of name and date of birth to ensure uniqueness", examples=["Person"]), dict(name="_to", column_name="title", type="string", description="The movie title", examples=["Movie"]), dict(name="roles", type="string", column_name="person_roles", description="The roles the person played in the movie", examples=["Woody"]), ], ), dict( title="DIRECTED", type="object", description="Relationship", properties=[ dict(name="_from", type="string", column_name="director_names", description="Director names are comma separated", examples=["Director"]), dict(name="_to", type="string", column_name="title", description="The label of the node this relationship ends at", examples=["Movie"]), ], ), ]

Jeg var nødt til at afvige fra det strenge JSON-skema og tilføje feltet column_name til outputtet for at hjælpe LLM med at generere importscriptet. At give eksempler på beskrivelser hjalp også i denne henseende, ellers var de egenskaber, der blev brugt i MATCH-sætningen, inkonsekvente.

Kæden

Her er den sidste prompt:

 model_prompt = PromptTemplate.from_template(""" You are an expert Graph Database administrator. Your task is to design a data model based on the information provided from an existing data source. You must decide where the following column fits in with the existing data model. Consider: * Does the column represent an entity, for example a Person, Place, or Movie? If so, this should be a node in its own right. * Does the column represent a relationship between two entities? If so, this should be a relationship between two nodes. * Does the column represent an attribute of an entity or relationship? If so, this should be a property of a node or relationship. * Does the column represent a shared attribute that could be interesting to query through to find similar nodes, for example a Genre? If so, this should be a node in its own right. ## Instructions for Nodes * Node labels are generally nouns, for example Person, Place, or Movie * Node titles should be in UpperCamelCase ## Instructions for Relationships * Relationshops are generally verbs, for example ACTED_IN, DIRECTED, or PURCHASED * Examples of good relationships are (:Person)-[:ACTED_IN]->(:Movie) or (:Person)-[:PURCHASED]->(:Product) * Relationships should be in UPPER_SNAKE_CASE * Provide any specific instructions for the field in the description. For example, does the field contain a list of comma separated values or a single value? ## Instructions for Properties * Relationships should be in lowerPascalCase * Prefer the shorter name where possible, for example "person_id" and "personId" should simply be "id" * If you are changing the property name from the original field name, mention the column name in the description * Do not include examples for integer or date fields * Always include instructions on data preparation for the field. Does it need to be cast as a string or split into multiple fields on a delimiting value? * Property keys should be letters only, no numbers or special characters. ## Important! Consider the examples provided. Does any data preparation need to be done to ensure the data is in the correct format? You must include any information about data preparation in the description. ## Example Output Here is an example of a good output: {example_output} ## New Data: Key: {key} Data Type: {type} Example Values: {examples} ## Existing Data Model Here is the existing data model: {existing_model} ## Keep Existing Data Model Apply your changes to the existing data model but never remove any existing definitions. """, partial_variables=dict(example_output=dumps(example_output))) model_chain = model_prompt | llm.with_structured_output(JSONSchemaSpecification)

Udførelse af kæden

For at opdatere modellen iterativt, gentog jeg nøglerne i datarammen og sendte hver nøgle, dens datatype og de første fem unikke værdier til prompten:

 from json_repair import dumps, loads existing_model = {} for i, key in enumerate(df): print("\n", i, key) print("----------------") try: res = try_chain(model_chain, dict( existing_model=dumps(existing_model), key=key, type=df[key].dtype, examples=dumps(df[key].unique()[:5].tolist()) )) print(res.notes) existing_model = loads(res.jsonschema) print([n['title'] for n in existing_model]) except Exception as e: print(e) pass existing_model

Konsoludgang:

 0 track_name ---------------- Adding 'track_name' to an existing data model. This represents a music track entity. ['Track'] 1 artist(s)_name ---------------- Adding a new column 'artist(s)_name' to the existing data model. This column represents multiple artists associated with tracks and should be modeled as a new node 'Artist' and a relationship 'PERFORMED_BY' from 'Track' to 'Artist'. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 2 artist_count ---------------- Added artist_count as a property of Track node. This property indicates the number of artists performing in the track. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 3 released_year ---------------- Add the released_year column to the existing data model as a property of the Track node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 4 released_month ---------------- Adding the 'released_month' column to the existing data model, considering it as an attribute of the Track node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 5 released_day ---------------- Added a new property 'released_day' to the 'Track' node to capture the day of the month a track was released. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 6 in_spotify_playlists ---------------- Adding the new column 'in_spotify_playlists' to the existing data model as a property of the 'Track' node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 7 in_spotify_charts ---------------- Adding the 'in_spotify_charts' column to the existing data model as a property of the Track node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 8 streams ---------------- Adding a new column 'streams' to the existing data model, representing the number of streams for a track. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 9 in_apple_playlists ---------------- Adding new column 'in_apple_playlists' to the existing data model ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 10 in_apple_charts ---------------- Adding 'in_apple_charts' as a property to the 'Track' node, representing the number of times the track appeared in the Apple charts. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 11 in_deezer_playlists ---------------- Add 'in_deezer_playlists' to the existing data model for a music track database. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 12 in_deezer_charts ---------------- Adding a new property 'inDeezerCharts' to the existing 'Track' node to represent the number of times the track appeared in Deezer charts. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 13 in_shazam_charts ---------------- Adding new data 'in_shazam_charts' to the existing data model. This appears to be an attribute of the 'Track' node, indicating the number of times a track appeared in the Shazam charts. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 14 bpm ---------------- Added bpm column as a property to the Track node as it represents a characteristic of the track. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 15 key ---------------- Adding the 'key' column to the existing data model. The 'key' represents the musical key of a track, which is a shared attribute that can be interesting to query through to find similar tracks. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 16 mode ---------------- Adding 'mode' to the existing data model. It represents a musical characteristic of a track, which is best captured as an attribute of the Track node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 17 danceability_% ---------------- Added 'danceability_%' to the existing data model as a property of the Track node. The field represents the danceability percentage of the track. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 18 valence_% ---------------- Adding the valence percentage column to the existing data model as a property of the Track node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 19 energy_% ---------------- Integration of the new column 'energy_%' into the existing data model. This column represents an attribute of the Track entity and should be added as a property of the Track node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 20 acousticness_% ---------------- Adding acousticness_% to the existing data model as a property of the Track node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 21 instrumentalness_% ---------------- Adding the new column 'instrumentalness_%' to the existing Track node as it represents an attribute of the Track entity. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 22 liveness_% ---------------- Adding the new column 'liveness_%' to the existing data model as an attribute of the Track node ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 23 speechiness_% ---------------- Adding the new column 'speechiness_%' to the existing data model as a property of the 'Track' node. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY'] 24 cover_url ---------------- Adding a new property 'cover_url' to the existing 'Track' node. This property represents the URL of the track's cover image. ['Track', 'Artist', 'PERFORMED_BY']

Efter et par justeringer af prompten til at håndtere use cases, endte jeg med en model, jeg var ret tilfreds med. LLM havde formået at fastslå, at datasættet bestod af spor, kunstner og et PERFORMED_BY-forhold for at forbinde de to:

 [ { "title": "Track", "type": "object", "description": "Node", "properties": [ { "name": "name", "column_name": "track_name", "type": "string", "description": "The name of the track", "examples": [ "Seven (feat. Latto) (Explicit Ver.)", "LALA", "vampire", "Cruel Summer", "WHERE SHE GOES", ], }, { "name": "artist_count", "column_name": "artist_count", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of artists performing in the track", "examples": [2, 1, 3, 8, 4], }, { "name": "released_year", "column_name": "released_year", "type": "integer", "description": "The year the track was released", "examples": [2023, 2019, 2022, 2013, 2014], }, { "name": "released_month", "column_name": "released_month", "type": "integer", "description": "The month the track was released", "examples": [7, 3, 6, 8, 5], }, { "name": "released_day", "column_name": "released_day", "type": "integer", "description": "The day of the month the track was released", "examples": [14, 23, 30, 18, 1], }, { "name": "inSpotifyPlaylists", "column_name": "in_spotify_playlists", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of Spotify playlists the track is in. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [553, 1474, 1397, 7858, 3133], }, { "name": "inSpotifyCharts", "column_name": "in_spotify_charts", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of times the track appeared in the Spotify charts. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [147, 48, 113, 100, 50], }, { "name": "streams", "column_name": "streams", "type": "array", "description": "The list of stream IDs for the track. Maintain the array format.", "examples": [ "141381703", "133716286", "140003974", "800840817", "303236322", ], }, { "name": "inApplePlaylists", "column_name": "in_apple_playlists", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of Apple playlists the track is in. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [43, 48, 94, 116, 84], }, { "name": "inAppleCharts", "column_name": "in_apple_charts", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of times the track appeared in the Apple charts. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [263, 126, 207, 133, 213], }, { "name": "inDeezerPlaylists", "column_name": "in_deezer_playlists", "type": "array", "description": "The list of Deezer playlist IDs the track is in. Maintain the array format.", "examples": ["45", "58", "91", "125", "87"], }, { "name": "inDeezerCharts", "column_name": "in_deezer_charts", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of times the track appeared in the Deezer charts. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [10, 14, 12, 15, 17], }, { "name": "inShazamCharts", "column_name": "in_shazam_charts", "type": "array", "description": "The list of Shazam chart IDs the track is in. Maintain the array format.", "examples": ["826", "382", "949", "548", "425"], }, { "name": "bpm", "column_name": "bpm", "type": "integer", "description": "The beats per minute of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [125, 92, 138, 170, 144], }, { "name": "key", "column_name": "key", "type": "string", "description": "The musical key of the track. Cast the value as a string.", "examples": ["B", "C#", "F", "A", "D"], }, { "name": "mode", "column_name": "mode", "type": "string", "description": "The mode of the track (eg, Major, Minor). Cast the value as a string.", "examples": ["Major", "Minor"], }, { "name": "danceability", "column_name": "danceability_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The danceability percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [80, 71, 51, 55, 65], }, { "name": "valence", "column_name": "valence_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The valence percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [89, 61, 32, 58, 23], }, { "name": "energy", "column_name": "energy_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The energy percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [83, 74, 53, 72, 80], }, { "name": "acousticness", "column_name": "acousticness_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The acousticness percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [31, 7, 17, 11, 14], }, { "name": "instrumentalness", "column_name": "instrumentalness_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The instrumentalness percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [0, 63, 17, 2, 19], }, { "name": "liveness", "column_name": "liveness_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The liveness percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [8, 10, 31, 11, 28], }, { "name": "speechiness", "column_name": "speechiness_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The speechiness percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [4, 6, 15, 24, 3], }, { "name": "coverUrl", "column_name": "cover_url", "type": "string", "description": "The URL of the track's cover image. If the value is 'Not Found', it should be cast as an empty string.", "examples": [ "https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b2730656d5ce813ca3cc4b677e05", "https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b273e85259a1cae29a8d91f2093d", ], }, ], }, { "title": "Artist", "type": "object", "description": "Node", "properties": [ { "name": "name", "column_name": "artist(s)_name", "type": "string", "description": "The name of the artist. Split values in column by a comma", "examples": [ "Latto", "Jung Kook", "Myke Towers", "Olivia Rodrigo", "Taylor Swift", "Bad Bunny", ], } ], }, { "title": "PERFORMED_BY", "type": "object", "description": "Relationship", "properties": [ { "name": "_from", "type": "string", "description": "The label of the node this relationship starts at", "examples": ["Track"], }, { "name": "_to", "type": "string", "description": "The label of the node this relationship ends at", "examples": ["Artist"], }, ], }, ] [ { "title": "Track", "type": "object", "description": "Node", "properties": [ { "name": "name", "column_name": "track_name", "type": "string", "description": "The name of the track", "examples": [ "Seven (feat. Latto) (Explicit Ver.)", "LALA", "vampire", "Cruel Summer", "WHERE SHE GOES", ], }, { "name": "artist_count", "column_name": "artist_count", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of artists performing in the track", "examples": [2, 1, 3, 8, 4], }, { "name": "released_year", "column_name": "released_year", "type": "integer", "description": "The year the track was released", "examples": [2023, 2019, 2022, 2013, 2014], }, { "name": "released_month", "column_name": "released_month", "type": "integer", "description": "The month the track was released", "examples": [7, 3, 6, 8, 5], }, { "name": "released_day", "column_name": "released_day", "type": "integer", "description": "The day of the month the track was released", "examples": [14, 23, 30, 18, 1], }, { "name": "inSpotifyPlaylists", "column_name": "in_spotify_playlists", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of Spotify playlists the track is in. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [553, 1474, 1397, 7858, 3133], }, { "name": "inSpotifyCharts", "column_name": "in_spotify_charts", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of times the track appeared in the Spotify charts. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [147, 48, 113, 100, 50], }, { "name": "streams", "column_name": "streams", "type": "array", "description": "The list of stream IDs for the track. Maintain the array format.", "examples": [ "141381703", "133716286", "140003974", "800840817", "303236322", ], }, { "name": "inApplePlaylists", "column_name": "in_apple_playlists", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of Apple playlists the track is in. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [43, 48, 94, 116, 84], }, { "name": "inAppleCharts", "column_name": "in_apple_charts", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of times the track appeared in the Apple charts. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [263, 126, 207, 133, 213], }, { "name": "inDeezerPlaylists", "column_name": "in_deezer_playlists", "type": "array", "description": "The list of Deezer playlist IDs the track is in. Maintain the array format.", "examples": ["45", "58", "91", "125", "87"], }, { "name": "inDeezerCharts", "column_name": "in_deezer_charts", "type": "integer", "description": "The number of times the track appeared in the Deezer charts. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [10, 14, 12, 15, 17], }, { "name": "inShazamCharts", "column_name": "in_shazam_charts", "type": "array", "description": "The list of Shazam chart IDs the track is in. Maintain the array format.", "examples": ["826", "382", "949", "548", "425"], }, { "name": "bpm", "column_name": "bpm", "type": "integer", "description": "The beats per minute of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [125, 92, 138, 170, 144], }, { "name": "key", "column_name": "key", "type": "string", "description": "The musical key of the track. Cast the value as a string.", "examples": ["B", "C#", "F", "A", "D"], }, { "name": "mode", "column_name": "mode", "type": "string", "description": "The mode of the track (eg, Major, Minor). Cast the value as a string.", "examples": ["Major", "Minor"], }, { "name": "danceability", "column_name": "danceability_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The danceability percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [80, 71, 51, 55, 65], }, { "name": "valence", "column_name": "valence_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The valence percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [89, 61, 32, 58, 23], }, { "name": "energy", "column_name": "energy_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The energy percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [83, 74, 53, 72, 80], }, { "name": "acousticness", "column_name": "acousticness_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The acousticness percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [31, 7, 17, 11, 14], }, { "name": "instrumentalness", "column_name": "instrumentalness_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The instrumentalness percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [0, 63, 17, 2, 19], }, { "name": "liveness", "column_name": "liveness_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The liveness percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [8, 10, 31, 11, 28], }, { "name": "speechiness", "column_name": "speechiness_%", "type": "integer", "description": "The speechiness percentage of the track. Cast the value as an integer.", "examples": [4, 6, 15, 24, 3], }, { "name": "coverUrl", "column_name": "cover_url", "type": "string", "description": "The URL of the track's cover image. If the value is 'Not Found', it should be cast as an empty string.", "examples": [ "https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b2730656d5ce813ca3cc4b677e05", "https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b273e85259a1cae29a8d91f2093d", ], }, ], }, { "title": "Artist", "type": "object", "description": "Node", "properties": [ { "name": "name", "column_name": "artist(s)_name", "type": "string", "description": "The name of the artist. Split values in column by a comma", "examples": [ "Latto", "Jung Kook", "Myke Towers", "Olivia Rodrigo", "Taylor Swift", "Bad Bunny", ], } ], }, { "title": "PERFORMED_BY", "type": "object", "description": "Relationship", "properties": [ { "name": "_from", "type": "string", "description": "The label of the node this relationship starts at", "examples": ["Track"], }, { "name": "_to", "type": "string", "description": "The label of the node this relationship ends at", "examples": ["Artist"], }, ], }, ]

Tilføjelse af unikke identifikatorer

Jeg har bemærket, at skemaet ikke indeholdt nogen unikke identifikatorer, og dette kan blive et problem, når det kommer til at importere relationer. Det er naturligt, at forskellige kunstnere ville udgive sange med samme navn , og to kunstnere kan have det samme navn.

Af denne grund var det vigtigt at oprette en identifikator for spor, så de kunne differentieres i et større datasæt:

 # Add primary key/unique identifiers uid_prompt = PromptTemplate.from_template(""" You are a graph database expert reviewing a single entity from a data model generated by a colleague. You want to ensure that all of the nodes imported into the database are unique. ## Example A schema contains Actors with a number of properties including name, date of birth. Two actors may have the same name then add a new compound property combining the name and date of birth. If combining values, include the instruction to convert the value to slug case. Call the new property 'id'. If you have identified a new property, add it to the list of properties leaving the rest intact. Include in the description the fields that are to be concatenated. ## Example Output Here is an example of a good output: {example_output} ## Current Entity Schema {entity} """, partial_variables=dict(example_output=dumps(example_output))) uid_chain = uid_prompt | llm.with_structured_output(JSONSchemaSpecification)

Dette trin er kun påkrævet for noder, så jeg udtog noderne fra skemaet, kørte kæden for hver og kombinerede derefter relationerne med de opdaterede definitioner:

 # extract nodes and relationships nodes = [n for n in existing_model if "node" in n["description"].lower()] rels = [n for n in existing_model if "node" not in n["description"].lower()] # generate a unique id for nodes with_uids = [] for entity in nodes: res = uid_chain.invoke(dict(entity=dumps(entity))) json = loads(res.jsonschema) with_uids = with_uids + json if type(json) == list else with_uids + [json] # combine nodes and relationships with_uids = with_uids + rels

Gennemgang af datamodel

For fornuft er det værd at tjekke modellen for optimeringer. Model_prompt gjorde et godt stykke arbejde med at identificere substantiver og verber, men i en mere kompleks model.

En iteration behandlede *_playlists og _charts kolonnerne som id'er og forsøgte at oprette Stream noder og IN_PLAYLIST relationer. Jeg antager, at dette skyldtes antallet af over 1.000 inklusive formatering med komma (f.eks. 1.001).

God idé, men måske lidt for smart. Men dette viser vigtigheden af at have et menneske i løkken, der forstår datastrukturen.

 # Add primary key/unique identifiers review_prompt = PromptTemplate.from_template(""" You are a graph database expert reviewing a data model generated by a colleague. Your task is to review the data model and ensure that it is fit for purpose. Check for: ## Check for nested objects Remember that Neo4j cannot store arrays of objects or nested objects. These must be converted into into separate nodes with relationships between them. You must include the new node and a reference to the relationship to the output schema. ## Check for Entities in properties If there is a property that represents an array of IDs, a new node should be created for that entity. You must include the new node and a reference to the relationship to the output schema. # Keep Instructions Ensure that the instructions for the nodes, relationships, and properties are clear and concise. You may improve them but the detail must not be removed in any circumstances. ## Current Entity Schema {entity} """) review_chain = review_prompt | llm.with_structured_output(JSONSchemaSpecification) review_nodes = [n for n in with_uids if "node" in n["description"].lower() ] review_rels = [n for n in with_uids if "node" not in n["description"].lower() ] reviewed = [] for entity in review_nodes: res = review_chain.invoke(dict(entity=dumps(entity))) json = loads(res.jsonschema) reviewed = reviewed + json # add relationships back in reviewed = reviewed + review_rels len(reviewed) reviewed = with_uids

I et scenarie i den virkelige verden vil jeg gerne køre dette et par gange for iterativt at forbedre datamodellen. Jeg ville sætte en maksimal grænse og derefter gentage op til det punkt, ellers ændres datamodelobjektet ikke længere.

Generer importerklæringer

På dette tidspunkt skal skemaet være robust nok og indeholde så meget information som muligt for at tillade en LLM at generere et sæt importscripts.

I overensstemmelse med Neo4j-dataimportanbefalinger bør filen behandles flere gange, hver gang der importeres en enkelt node eller relation for at undgå ivrige operationer og låsning.

 import_prompt = PromptTemplate.from_template(""" Based on the data model, write a Cypher statement to import the following data from a CSV file into Neo4j. Do not use LOAD CSV as this data will be imported using the Neo4j Python Driver, use UNWIND on the $rows parameter instead. You are writing a multi-pass import process, so concentrate on the entity mentioned. When importing data, you must use the following guidelines: * follow the instructions in the description when identifying primary keys. * Use the instructions in the description to determine the format of properties when a finding. * When combining fields into an ID, use the apoc.text.slug function to convert any text to slug case and toLower to convert the string to lowercase - apoc.text.slug(toLower(row.`name`)) * If you split a property, convert it to a string and use the trim function to remove any whitespace - trim(toString(row.`name`)) * When combining properties, wrap each property in the coalesce function so the property is not null if one of the values is not set - coalesce(row.`id`, '') + '--'+ coalsece(row.`title`) * Use the `column_name` field to map the CSV column to the property in the data model. * Wrap all column names from the CSV in backticks - for example row.`column_name`. * When you merge nodes, merge on the unique identifier and nothing else. All other properties should be set using `SET`. * Do not use apoc.periodic.iterate, the files will be batched in the application. Data Model: {data_model} Current Entity: {entity} """)

Denne kæde kræver et andet outputobjekt end de foregående trin. I dette tilfælde er cypher-medlemmet vigtigst, men jeg ønskede også at inkludere en chain_of_thought-nøgle for at opmuntre Chain of Thought:

 class CypherOutputSpecification(BaseModel): chain_of_thought: str = Field(description="Any reasoning used to write the Cypher statement") cypher: str = Field(description="The Cypher statement to import the data") notes: Optional[str] = Field(description="Any notes or closing remarks about the Cypher statement") import_chain = import_prompt | llm.with_structured_output(CypherOutputSpecification)

Den samme proces gælder derefter for at iterere over hver af de gennemgåede definitioner og generere Cypher:

 import_cypher = [] for n in reviewed: print('\n\n------', n['title']) res = import_chain.invoke(dict( data_model=dumps(reviewed), entity=n )) import_cypher.append(( res.cypher )) print(res.cypher)

Konsoludgang:

 ------ Track UNWIND $rows AS row MERGE (t:Track {id: apoc.text.slug(toLower(coalesce(row.`track_name`, '') + '-' + coalesce(row.`released_year`, '')))}) SET t.name = trim(toString(row.`track_name`)), t.artist_count = toInteger(row.`artist_count`), t.released_year = toInteger(row.`released_year`), t.released_month = toInteger(row.`released_month`), t.released_day = toInteger(row.`released_day`), t.inSpotifyPlaylists = toInteger(row.`in_spotify_playlists`), t.inSpotifyCharts = toInteger(row.`in_spotify_charts`), t.streams = row.`streams`, t.inApplePlaylists = toInteger(row.`in_apple_playlists`), t.inAppleCharts = toInteger(row.`in_apple_charts`), t.inDeezerPlaylists = row.`in_deezer_playlists`, t.inDeezerCharts = toInteger(row.`in_deezer_charts`), t.inShazamCharts = row.`in_shazam_charts`, t.bpm = toInteger(row.`bpm`), t.key = trim(toString(row.`key`)), t.mode = trim(toString(row.`mode`)), t.danceability = toInteger(row.`danceability_%`), t.valence = toInteger(row.`valence_%`), t.energy = toInteger(row.`energy_%`), t.acousticness = toInteger(row.`acousticness_%`), t.instrumentalness = toInteger(row.`instrumentalness_%`), t.liveness = toInteger(row.`liveness_%`), t.speechiness = toInteger(row.`speechiness_%`), t.coverUrl = CASE row.`cover_url` WHEN 'Not Found' THEN '' ELSE trim(toString(row.`cover_url`)) END ------ Artist UNWIND $rows AS row WITH row, split(row.`artist(s)_name`, ',') AS artistNames UNWIND artistNames AS artistName MERGE (a:Artist {id: apoc.text.slug(toLower(trim(artistName)))}) SET a.name = trim(artistName) ------ PERFORMED_BY UNWIND $rows AS row UNWIND split(row.`artist(s)_name`, ',') AS artist_name MERGE (t:Track {id: apoc.text.slug(toLower(row.`track_name`)) + '-' + trim(toString(row.`released_year`))}) MERGE (a:Artist {id: apoc.text.slug(toLower(trim(artist_name)))}) MERGE (t)-[:PERFORMED_BY]->(a)

Denne prompt krævede noget ingeniørarbejde for at opnå ensartede resultater:

• Nogle gange vil Cypher inkludere MERGE-sætning med flere definerede felter, hvilket i bedste fald er suboptimalt. Hvis nogen af kolonnerne er nul, mislykkes hele importen.
• Til tider ville resultatet inkludere apoc.period.iterate , som ikke længere er påkrævet, og jeg ville have kode, jeg kunne udføre med Python-driveren.
• Jeg var nødt til at gentage, at det angivne kolonnenavn skulle bruges ved oprettelse af relationer.
• LLM ville bare ikke følge instruktionerne, når du bruger den unikke identifikator på noderne i hver ende af forholdet, så det tog et par forsøg at få det til at følge instruktionerne i beskrivelsen. Der var lidt frem og tilbage mellem denne prompt og model_prompt.
• Backticks var nødvendige for kolonnenavnene, der indeholdt specialtegn (f.eks. energy_%).

Det ville også være fordelagtigt at opdele dette i to prompter - en for noder og en for relationer. Men det er en opgave for en anden dag.

Opret de unikke begrænsninger

Dernæst kan importscripts bruges som grundlag for at skabe unikke begrænsninger i databasen:

 constraint_prompt = PromptTemplate.from_template(""" You are an expert graph database administrator. Use the following Cypher statement to write a Cypher statement to create unique constraints on any properties used in a MERGE statement. The correct syntax for a unique constraint is: CREATE CONSTRAINT movie_title_id IF NOT EXISTS FOR (m:Movie) REQUIRE m.title IS UNIQUE; Cypher: {cypher} """) constraint_chain = constraint_prompt | llm.with_structured_output(CypherOutputSpecification) constraint_queries = [] for statement in import_cypher: res = constraint_chain.invoke(dict(cypher=statement)) statements = res.cypher.split(";") for cypher in statements: constraint_queries.append(cypher)

Konsoludgang:

 CREATE CONSTRAINT track_id_unique IF NOT EXISTS FOR (t:Track) REQUIRE t.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT stream_id IF NOT EXISTS FOR (s:Stream) REQUIRE s.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT playlist_id IF NOT EXISTS FOR (p:Playlist) REQUIRE p.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT chart_id IF NOT EXISTS FOR (c:Chart) REQUIRE c.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT track_id_unique IF NOT EXISTS FOR (t:Track) REQUIRE t.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT stream_id_unique IF NOT EXISTS FOR (s:Stream) REQUIRE s.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT track_id_unique IF NOT EXISTS FOR (t:Track) REQUIRE t.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT playlist_id_unique IF NOT EXISTS FOR (p:Playlist) REQUIRE p.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT track_id_unique IF NOT EXISTS FOR (track:Track) REQUIRE track.id IS UNIQUE CREATE CONSTRAINT chart_id_unique IF NOT EXISTS FOR (chart:Chart) REQUIRE chart.id IS UNIQUE

Nogle gange ville denne prompt returnere udsagn for indekser og begrænsninger, derfor opdelingen på semikolon.

Kør Import

Med alt på plads var det tid til at udføre Cypher-udtalelserne:

 from os import getenv from neo4j import GraphDatabase driver = GraphDatabase.driver( getenv("NEO4J_URI"), auth=( getenv("NEO4J_USERNAME"), getenv("NEO4J_PASSWORD") ) ) with driver.session() as session: # truncate the db session.run("MATCH (n) DETACH DELETE n") # create constraints for q in constraint_queries: if q.strip() != "": session.run(q) # import the data for q in import_cypher: if q.strip() != "": res = session.run(q, rows=rows).consume() print(q) print(res.counters)

QA på datasættet

Dette indlæg ville ikke være komplet uden noget QA på datasættet ved hjælp af GraphCypherQACain:

 from langchain.chains import GraphCypherQAChain from langchain_community.graphs import Neo4jGraph graph = Neo4jGraph( url=getenv("NEO4J_URI"), username=getenv("NEO4J_USERNAME"), password=getenv("NEO4J_PASSWORD"), enhanced_schema=True ) qa = GraphCypherQAChain.from_llm( llm, graph=graph, allow_dangerous_requests=True, verbose=True )

Mest populære kunstnere

Hvem er de mest populære kunstnere i databasen?

 qa.invoke({"query": "Who are the most popular artists?"}) > Entering new GraphCypherQAChain chain... Generated Cypher: cypher MATCH (:Track)-[:PERFORMED_BY]->(a:Artist) RETURN a.name, COUNT(*) AS popularity ORDER BY popularity DESC LIMIT 10 Full Context: [{'a.name': 'Bad Bunny', 'popularity': 40}, {'a.name': 'Taylor Swift', 'popularity': 38}, {'a.name': 'The Weeknd', 'popularity': 36}, {'a.name': 'SZA', 'popularity': 23}, {'a.name': 'Kendrick Lamar', 'popularity': 23}, {'a.name': 'Feid', 'popularity': 21}, {'a.name': 'Drake', 'popularity': 19}, {'a.name': 'Harry Styles', 'popularity': 17}, {'a.name': 'Peso Pluma', 'popularity': 16}, {'a.name': '21 Savage', 'popularity': 14}] > Finished chain. { "query": "Who are the most popular artists?", "result": "Bad Bunny, Taylor Swift, and The Weeknd are the most popular artists." }

LLM så ud til at vurdere populariteten ud fra antallet af numre, en kunstner har været på, snarere end deres samlede antal streams.

Slag pr. minut

Hvilket spor har det højeste BPM?

 qa.invoke({"query": "Which track has the highest BPM?"}) > Entering new GraphCypherQAChain chain... Generated Cypher: cypher MATCH (t:Track) RETURN t ORDER BY t.bpm DESC LIMIT 1 Full Context: [{'t': {'id': 'seven-feat-latto-explicit-ver--2023'}}] > Finished chain. { "query": "Which track has the highest BPM?", "result": "I don't know the answer." }

Forbedring af Cypher Generation Prompt

I dette tilfælde ser Cypher fint ud, og det korrekte resultat blev inkluderet i prompten, men gpt-4o kunne ikke fortolke svaret. Det ser ud til, at den CYPHER_GENERATION_PROMPT, der blev sendt til GraphCypherQACain, kunne klare sig med yderligere instruktioner for at gøre kolonnenavnene mere udførlige.

Brug altid udførlige kolonnenavne i Cypher-sætningen ved at bruge etiketten og egenskabsnavnene. Brug for eksempel 'person_name' i stedet for 'name'.

GraphCypherQACain med brugerdefineret prompt:

 CYPHER_GENERATION_TEMPLATE = """Task:Generate Cypher statement to query a graph database. Instructions: Use only the provided relationship types and properties in the schema. Do not use any other relationship types or properties that are not provided. Schema: {schema} Note: Do not include any explanations or apologies in your responses. Do not respond to any questions that might ask anything else than for you to construct a Cypher statement. Do not include any text except the generated Cypher statement. Always use verbose column names in the Cypher statement using the label and property names. For example, use 'person_name' instead of 'name'. Include data from the immediate network around the node in the result to provide extra context. For example, include the Movie release year, a list of actors and their roles, or the director of a movie. When ordering by a property, add an `IS NOT NULL` check to ensure that only nodes with that property are returned. Examples: Here are a few examples of generated Cypher statements for particular questions: # How many people acted in Top Gun? MATCH (m:Movie {{name:"Top Gun"}}) RETURN COUNT { (m)<-[:ACTED_IN]-() } AS numberOfActors The question is: {question}""" CYPHER_GENERATION_PROMPT = PromptTemplate( input_variables=["schema", "question"], template=CYPHER_GENERATION_TEMPLATE ) qa = GraphCypherQAChain.from_llm( llm, graph=graph, allow_dangerous_requests=True, verbose=True, cypher_prompt=CYPHER_GENERATION_PROMPT, )

Numre fremført af de fleste kunstnere

Grafer udmærker sig ved at returnere en optælling af antallet af relationer efter type og retning.

 qa.invoke({"query": "Which tracks are performed by the most artists?"}) > Entering new GraphCypherQAChain chain... Generated Cypher: cypher MATCH (t:Track) WITH t, COUNT { (t)-[:PERFORMED_BY]->(:Artist) } as artist_count WHERE artist_count IS NOT NULL RETURN t.id AS track_id, t.name AS track_name, artist_count ORDER BY artist_count DESC Full Context: [{'track_id': 'los-del-espacio-2023', 'track_name': 'Los del Espacio', 'artist_count': 8}, {'track_id': 'se-le-ve-2021', 'track_name': 'Se Le Ve', 'artist_count': 8}, {'track_id': 'we-don-t-talk-about-bruno-2021', 'track_name': "We Don't Talk About Bruno", 'artist_count': 7}, {'track_id': 'cayï-ï-la-noche-feat-cruz-cafunï-ï-abhir-hathi-bejo-el-ima--2022', 'track_name': None, 'artist_count': 6}, {'track_id': 'jhoome-jo-pathaan-2022', 'track_name': 'Jhoome Jo Pathaan', 'artist_count': 6}, {'track_id': 'besharam-rang-from-pathaan--2022', 'track_name': None, 'artist_count': 6}, {'track_id': 'nobody-like-u-from-turning-red--2022', 'track_name': None, 'artist_count': 6}, {'track_id': 'ultra-solo-remix-2022', 'track_name': 'ULTRA SOLO REMIX', 'artist_count': 5}, {'track_id': 'angel-pt-1-feat-jimin-of-bts-jvke-muni-long--2023', 'track_name': None, 'artist_count': 5}, {'track_id': 'link-up-metro-boomin-don-toliver-wizkid-feat-beam-toian-spider-verse-remix-spider-man-across-the-spider-verse--2023', 'track_name': None, 'artist_count': 5}] > Finished chain. { "query": "Which tracks are performed by the most artists?", "result": "The tracks \"Los del Espacio\" and \"Se Le Ve\" are performed by the most artists, with each track having 8 artists." }

Oversigt

CSV-analysen og -modelleringen er den mest tidskrævende del. Det kan tage mere end fem minutter at generere.

Selve omkostningerne var ret billige. På otte timers eksperimenter må jeg have sendt hundredvis af anmodninger, og jeg endte med at bruge en dollar eller deromkring.

Der var en række udfordringer at nå til dette punkt:

• Prompterne tog adskillige gentagelser for at komme rigtigt. Dette problem kan løses ved at finjustere modellen eller give eksempler på få skud.
• JSON-svar fra GPT-4o kan være inkonsekvente. Jeg blev anbefalet json-repair , hvilket var bedre end at prøve at få LLM til at validere sit eget JSON-output.

Jeg kan se denne tilgang fungere godt i en LangGraph-implementering, hvor operationerne køres i rækkefølge, hvilket giver en LLM mulighed for at bygge og forfine modellen. Efterhånden som nye modeller frigives, kan de også have gavn af finjustering.

Lær mere

Tjek Udnyttelse af store sprogmodeller med Neo4j for at få flere oplysninger om at strømline processen til oprettelse af videngrafer med LLM'er. Læs Opret en Neo4j GraphRAG-arbejdsgang ved hjælp af LangChain og LangGraph for mere om LangGraph og Neo4j. Og for at lære mere om finjustering, tjek Knowledge Graphs and LLMs: Fine-Tuning vs. Retrieval-Augmented Generation .

For at lære mere om dette emne kan du slutte dig til NODES 2024 den 7. november, vores gratis virtuelle udviklerkonference om intelligente apps, vidensgrafer og AI. Tilmeld dig nu!