The discussion about human reputation program is growing fast. We no longer talk about if it will happen, but when it will happen.
China has already started to implement their government controlled human reputation program the wrong way.
Building online reputation system is very risky.
So how online reputation should be build for it to be beneficial and not harmful for the society?
1. Decentralized government proof system
Government nor any other authority will not be able to tamper or edit ratings.
This will also mean that government nor any other authority cannot lower a person’s rating as a punishment or increase as a reward.
2. Voluntary
Online rating program should never be mandatory and everyone will be willing to decide if they want to join it or not.
This however will not forbid to offer incentive to those who have joined it.
3. Mandatory for all government officials
All law enforcement agents, government officials and politicians would be forced to be part of the program. And in case their rating would go below the average they would lose their job.
Not to be in conflict with the “voluntary” rule any government official may leave his office if he does not want to be part of the program.
4. Free
It must be totally free to rate people and to be rated.
5. Equality
Therefore even a homeless person will be able to rate the president and his vote will have the same weight.
6. Transparency
All rating and raters are public the moment the are given. No anonymous ratings allowed.
7. No intervention
Rating cannot be removed or changed by anyone else except the rater even if it’s acknowledged to be false.
However the rater can always change his rating up and or down even years after.
8. Easy rating system
The rating system should be easy with scale of 1 to 3 or 1 to 5. No complicated forms or text reviews.
9. Positive experience
To avoid obscenity, written reviews will not be allowed. People will also not be able to comment on reviews or messages to other users within the program.