China is likely to deploy Artificial Intelligence-generated content via social media to sway public opinion to boost its geopolitical interests during elections in countries like India, South Korea...

India's polls under Chinese threat, Microsoft warns of AI misuse

India News: A recent Microsoft report reveals China&#x27;s AI use in Lok Sabha elections to influence outcomes, with minimal immediate impact expected. China&#x27;s AI expe

China may use AI to influence LS polls for own benefit: Microsoft | India News - Times of India

Build 22635 doesn’t do an awful lot more than these Copilot tweaks, but there is another change here for Windows Share. Microsoft is making it so you can use this functionality to share directly to a specific Microsoft Teams channel or group chat. (This is an ability that had been in testing ...

Microsoft is testing small but impactful changes to draw your attention to Copilot AI on the Windows 11 desktop | TechRadar

Microsoft and another AI play focused on enterprise applications lead this weekend&#x27;s watch list of top stocks near buy points.

Microsoft And AI Play Lead Five Stocks Near Buy Points | Investor's Business Daily

New York, Apr 6 (PTI) China is likely to deploy Artificial Intelligence-generated content via social media to sway public opinion to boost its geopolitical interests during elections in countries like India, South Korea and the US, tech giant Microsoft has warned.

China may misuse AI to target elections in India, other nations: Microsoft

Microsoft has warned that China is gearing up to disrupt the upcoming elections in India, the United States and South Korea by using artificial intelligence-generated content.

Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Microsoft Reveals How China Plans To Disrupt Indian Elections Using AI

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – 05 April 2024 – Microsoft has announced the appointment of Laurence Si as the Managing Director for its operations in Malaysia, effective 01 July 2024. He will assume the operational responsibilities from K Raman whose new role will be announced on 01 July 2024.

Microsoft appoints Laurence Si to lead Malaysia – Microsoft Malaysia News Center

Chinese Communist Party-linked accounts have frequently shared AI-generated memes, audio, and videos online.

Microsoft warns China will use AI to try to influence US elections

A &#x27;fairly private person&#x27; might have just saved the world from a giant cyberattack.

With 3 Short Words, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella Just Showed How to Praise a Reluctant Hero Employee in Public | Inc.com

China is using fake social media accounts to sow division in elections and has increased its use of AI-generated content to further its goals around the world. These are among the Microsoft Threat Intelligence insights in the latest East Asia report published today by the Microsoft Threat Analysis ...

China tests US voter fault lines and ramps AI content to boost its geopolitical interests - Microsoft On the Issues

Microsoft

microsoft

A rising number of businesses have adopted the so-called BTC standard, which means that they plan to regularly add Bitcoin to their balance sheet. However, none of these companies are big enough to change the world’s view of Bitcoin as a reserve asset. The only notable Bitcoin holder among big businesses is Tesla, but Elon Musk’s company does not have an active Bitcoin purchase strategy. Microsoft had a chance to become a major corporate player in the crypto market. Its shareholders have recently voted on the NCPPR (National Center for Public Policy Research) proposal to add BTC to the company’s reserves. To be precise, NCPPR urged Microsoft’s board to conduct a study on whether the potential inclusion of BTC as a balance sheet asset would serve the long-term interests of the company’s shareholders. The board of directors, which issues its recommendations before the vote, recommended rejecting the NCPPR proposal. The shareholders voted in line with recommendations and rejected the idea of adding Bitcoin to Microsoft’s balance sheet. Just 0.55% of votes were cast for the proposal to consider BTC as a balance sheet asset. Microsoft’s main shareholders are institutional investors. The largest investors in Microsoft are Vanguard and BlackRock (the one that launched the most successful spot ETF on Bitcoin). They voted against the proposal. Microsoft’s board of directors argued that it had already conducted a thorough analysis of BTC and came to the conclusion that it was not suitable for the company’s balance sheet. According to the board, corporate reserves should include stable and predictable investments to ensure liquidity and operational funding. It’s hard to argue that Bitcoin is a stable investment, like cash. In fact, no one would need BTC if it behaved like cash, which means constantly losing value in real terms, month after month and year after year. Investors buy BTC to preserve and grow their capital in real terms in order to buy more goods, services, and assets in the future. Bitcoin is not suited to guarantee the availability of a predefined amount of money in dollar equivalent at a certain point in time. Apparently, similar proposals would lose in the upcoming shareholder votes as institutional investors would follow the recommendations of the companies’ boards. However, BTC activists will soon learn from the mistakes they made during the first attempt to push big companies to adopt a Bitcoin strategy. Recommending Bitcoin as a substitute for traditional liquidity sources is a clear mistake as Bitcoin is hardly suitable for such purposes. Instead, activists must insist that Bitcoin should find its place in long-term investments of big companies together with their factories, equipment, and intellectual property. Such an approach would eliminate the need to evaluate the current volatility of Bitcoin, therefore depriving the companies’ boards of their key argument against the world’s main cryptocurrency. As shareholders of big companies include investment giants that have already issued spot ETFs on crypto, the chances to break the resistance of traditional finance will grow significantly. A rising number of businesses have adopted the so-called BTC standard, which means that they plan to regularly add Bitcoin to their balance sheet. However, none of these companies are big enough to change the world’s view of Bitcoin as a reserve asset. The only notable Bitcoin holder among big businesses is Tesla, but Elon Musk’s company does not have an active Bitcoin purchase strategy. Microsoft had a chance to become a major corporate player in the crypto market. Its shareholders have recently voted on the NCPPR (National Center for Public Policy Research) proposal to add BTC to the company’s reserves. To be precise, NCPPR urged Microsoft’s board to conduct a study on whether the potential inclusion of BTC as a balance sheet asset would serve the long-term interests of the company’s shareholders. The board of directors, which issues its recommendations before the vote, recommended rejecting the NCPPR proposal. The shareholders voted in line with recommendations and rejected the idea of adding Bitcoin to Microsoft’s balance sheet. Just 0.55% of votes were cast for the proposal to consider BTC as a balance sheet asset. Microsoft’s main shareholders are institutional investors. The largest investors in Microsoft are Vanguard and BlackRock (the one that launched the most successful spot ETF on Bitcoin). They voted against the proposal. Microsoft’s board of directors argued that it had already conducted a thorough analysis of BTC and came to the conclusion that it was not suitable for the company’s balance sheet. According to the board, corporate reserves should include stable and predictable investments to ensure liquidity and operational funding. It’s hard to argue that Bitcoin is a stable investment, like cash. In fact, no one would need BTC if it behaved like cash, which means constantly losing value in real terms, month after month and year after year. Investors buy BTC to preserve and grow their capital in real terms in order to buy more goods, services, and assets in the future. Bitcoin is not suited to guarantee the availability of a predefined amount of money in dollar equivalent at a certain point in time. Apparently, similar proposals would lose in the upcoming shareholder votes as institutional investors would follow the recommendations of the companies’ boards. However, BTC activists will soon learn from the mistakes they made during the first attempt to push big companies to adopt a Bitcoin strategy. Recommending Bitcoin as a substitute for traditional liquidity sources is a clear mistake as Bitcoin is hardly suitable for such purposes. Instead, activists must insist that Bitcoin should find its place in long-term investments of big companies together with their factories, equipment, and intellectual property. Such an approach would eliminate the need to evaluate the current volatility of Bitcoin, therefore depriving the companies’ boards of their key argument against the world’s main cryptocurrency. As shareholders of big companies include investment giants that have already issued spot ETFs on crypto, the chances to break the resistance of traditional finance will grow significantly.

Microsoft Defeats Proposal Asking Company to Add Bitcoin to Its Balance Sheet

Microsoft ukax Propuesta ukaruw atipt’i, Empresarux Bitcoin ukar Balance ukar yapxatañapatak mayi

মাইক্রোসফ্ট তার ব্যালেন্স শীটে বিটকয়েন যুক্ত করার জন্য কোম্পানিকে অনুরোধ করা প্রস্তাবকে পরাজিত করেছে

Microsoft rechaza propuesta que pedía a la empresa añadir Bitcoin a su balance

Microsoft-ek proposamena gainditzen du konpainiari Bitcoin bere balantzean gehitzeko eskatuz

מיקרוסופט מביסה את ההצעה המבקשת מחברה להוסיף ביטקוין למאזנה שלה

マイクロソフト、ビットコインをバランスシートに加えるよう求める提案を否決

Microsoft alongi Proposition oyo esengaki na entreprise ebakisa Bitcoin na bilan na yango

„Microsoft“ atmetė pasiūlymą, prašydama įmonės įtraukti Bitcoin į savo balansą

Microsoft отклонила предложение, призывающее компанию добавить биткоин в свой баланс

Microsoft besegrar förslag som ber företaget att lägga till Bitcoin till sin balansräkning

Microsoft пешниҳоди аз ширкат хоҳиши илова кардани Bitcoin ба варақаи тавозунашро рад кард

Microsoft відхиляє пропозицію про додавання біткойна до свого балансу

They’re two of the world’s largest stocks by market capitalization, but could the might of Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) come under new strain in 2025 as fresh challenges emerge? The news that London-based investment firm Findlay Park, which counts $10.7 billion in assets under management, has been cutting its holdings of both Nvidia and Microsoft has raised eyebrows throughout US markets. Findlay Park’s pedigree for success can be found in the performance of its sole fund, the American Fund, which has outperformed 86% of its peers, making its decision to lower exposure to two of the world’s largest stocks particularly curious. The fund’s CEO Simon Pryke highlighted tepid earnings and growth expectations, as well as misaligned valuations with this slower rate of growth as a fundamental reason for trimming holdings in the two tech giants. But could we see the likes of Nvidia and Microsoft struggle to win over institutional investors in the new year? The future growth of the stocks will depend on managing hype and sustainable growth. Could Nvidia Struggle as Growth Slows? Being one of the ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks, there’s little doubt about Nvidia’s pedigree, the stock has rallied amid the ongoing generative AI boom to become one of the world’s most valuable stocks. Nvidia’s Q3 2024 earnings reports were impressive, posting 94% year-over-year growth and sales of $35 billion. Nvidia’s data center business also posted growth of 112% thanks to increasing AI demand, while net profit doubled to $20 billion. However, there are concerns over Nvidia’s long-term growth prospects. The company’s forecasted revenue of $37.5 billion for the fourth quarter, slightly above analyst estimates of $37.09 billion, is healthy but far behind its previous quarterly growth rates. Should Nvidia’s fourth-quarter forecast be met, it indicates a year-to-year growth of around 70% from 2023. This would be impressive for most firms, but for a company that recorded 265% annual growth in the year-ago period? Not so much. Despite this, it’s worth looking at Nvidia’s advantageous position at the forefront of an AI market that’s ripe for growth. With Nvidia holding around 90% of the GPU market and 98% of the GPU training market, buying into NVDA is tantamount to betting on the growth of generative AI, which is a market forecasted to be worth $1.3 trillion by 2032. There’s also more hope that Nvidia can sustain its growth rates through innovations like the CUDA platform, which is a software framework designed to accelerate the capabilities of GPU software. “Forecasts suggest that Nvidia could continue its upward trajectory, potentially reaching a valuation of $10 trillion by 2030,” suggests Maxim Manturov, head of investment research at Freedom24. “This ambitious target reflects expectations of sustained growth in both the hardware and software segments, with CUDA playing a key role in expanding market reach and strengthening its presence. competitive advantage.” Can Microsoft Out-Innovate its Falling Market Share? Microsoft’s slipping grip on the global desktop market will be a cause for concern as Windows 11’s market share fell from 35.6% in October 2024 to 34.9% by December. Although Windows 10 made subtle gains, MSFT’s struggle to win new consumers for its more recent release could point to trouble ahead. In addition to these problems, the company has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the UK over the price of its software. If successful, Microsoft could be liable to pay a fine exceeding £1 billion ($1.27bn). MSFT has been making steady progress on Wall Street, posting growth of nearly 15% for the calendar year up to the beginning of December, but investors will want to see more ground covered in selling newer software to consumers. However, solace can be taken from Microsoft’s wins elsewhere. Although Windows 11 has struggled for dominance in the global desktop market, the system has achieved a new high market share of 53% throughout Steam’s gaming market. This highlights the firm’s long-term focus on building into the lucrative video game landscape, which is forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 13.1% towards 2030. Microsoft can also secure more Wall Street growth through its various environmental initiatives. Having committed $1 billion to its Climate Innovation Fund, the tech leader’s investments in climate change-focused technologies are likely to gain new resonance in the coming years as global warming continues to climb international priority lists. Already, Microsoft has provided 850 grants to organizations in 110 countries as part of its AI for Earth scheme, and these initiatives can be crucial to the stock’s sustainability credentials. What’s Next for NVDA and MSFT? The challenges facing Nvidia and Microsoft revolve around their ability to build on their impressive performance in recent years. The scale of the AI boom is such that retaining their seismic market share across key industries is essential, and this will require a commitment to R&D, and outpacing a growing network of competitors. However, with strong innovation pipelines and commitments to sustainability, both stocks appear set to maintain strong growth rates into the future. Determining the scale of this growth is likely to be the $1 trillion question for key institutional investors. They’re two of the world’s largest stocks by market capitalization, but could the might of Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) come under new strain in 2025 as fresh challenges emerge? The news that London-based investment firm Findlay Park, which counts $10.7 billion in assets under management, has been cutting its holdings of both Nvidia and Microsoft has raised eyebrows throughout US markets. Findlay Park’s pedigree for success can be found in the performance of its sole fund, the American Fund, which has outperformed 86% of its peers, making its decision to lower exposure to two of the world’s largest stocks particularly curious. The fund’s CEO Simon Pryke highlighted tepid earnings and growth expectations , as well as misaligned valuations with this slower rate of growth as a fundamental reason for trimming holdings in the two tech giants. tepid earnings and growth expectations tepid earnings and growth expectations But could we see the likes of Nvidia and Microsoft struggle to win over institutional investors in the new year? The future growth of the stocks will depend on managing hype and sustainable growth. likes of Nvidia Could Nvidia Struggle as Growth Slows? Being one of the ‘ Magnificent Seven ’ stocks, there’s little doubt about Nvidia’s pedigree, the stock has rallied amid the ongoing generative AI boom to become one of the world’s most valuable stocks. Nvidia’s Q3 2024 earnings reports were impressive, posting 94% year-over-year growth and sales of $35 billion. Magnificent Seven Magnificent Seven Nvidia’s data center business also posted growth of 112% thanks to increasing AI demand, while net profit doubled to $20 billion. However, there are concerns over Nvidia’s long-term growth prospects. The company’s forecasted revenue of $37.5 billion for the fourth quarter, slightly above analyst estimates of $37.09 billion, is healthy but far behind its previous quarterly growth rates. Should Nvidia’s fourth-quarter forecast be met, it indicates a year-to-year growth of around 70% from 2023. This would be impressive for most firms, but for a company that recorded 265% annual growth in the year-ago period? Not so much. year-to-year growth of around 70% year-to-year growth of around 70% Despite this, it’s worth looking at Nvidia’s advantageous position at the forefront of an AI market that’s ripe for growth. With Nvidia holding around 90% of the GPU market and 98% of the GPU training market, buying into NVDA is tantamount to betting on the growth of generative AI, which is a market forecasted to be worth $1.3 trillion by 2032 . 90% of the GPU market 90% of the GPU market worth $1.3 trillion by 2032 worth $1.3 trillion by 2032 There’s also more hope that Nvidia can sustain its growth rates through innovations like the CUDA platform, which is a software framework designed to accelerate the capabilities of GPU software. “Forecasts suggest that Nvidia could continue its upward trajectory, potentially reaching a valuation of $10 trillion by 2030,” suggests Maxim Manturov, head of investment research at Freedom24. “This ambitious target reflects expectations of sustained growth in both the hardware and software segments, with CUDA playing a key role in expanding market reach and strengthening its presence. competitive advantage.” Can Microsoft Out-Innovate its Falling Market Share? Microsoft’s slipping grip on the global desktop market will be a cause for concern as Windows 11’s market share fell from 35.6% in October 2024 to 34.9% by December. Although Windows 10 made subtle gains, MSFT’s struggle to win new consumers for its more recent release could point to trouble ahead. market share fell from 35.6% market share fell from 35.6% In addition to these problems, the company has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the UK over the price of its software. If successful, Microsoft could be liable to pay a fine exceeding £1 billion ($1.27bn). MSFT has been making steady progress on Wall Street , posting growth of nearly 15% for the calendar year up to the beginning of December, but investors will want to see more ground covered in selling newer software to consumers. MSFT has been making steady progress on Wall Street However, solace can be taken from Microsoft’s wins elsewhere. Although Windows 11 has struggled for dominance in the global desktop market, the system has achieved a new high market share of 53% throughout Steam’s gaming market. This highlights the firm’s long-term focus on building into the lucrative video game landscape, which is forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 13.1% towards 2030. market share of 53% market share of 53% Microsoft can also secure more Wall Street growth through its various environmental initiatives. Having committed $1 billion to its Climate Innovation Fund, the tech leader’s investments in climate change-focused technologies are likely to gain new resonance in the coming years as global warming continues to climb international priority lists. Already, Microsoft has provided 850 grants to organizations in 110 countries as part of its AI for Earth scheme, and these initiatives can be crucial to the stock’s sustainability credentials. What’s Next for NVDA and MSFT? The challenges facing Nvidia and Microsoft revolve around their ability to build on their impressive performance in recent years. The scale of the AI boom is such that retaining their seismic market share across key industries is essential, and this will require a commitment to R&D, and outpacing a growing network of competitors. However, with strong innovation pipelines and commitments to sustainability, both stocks appear set to maintain strong growth rates into the future. Determining the scale of this growth is likely to be the $1 trillion question for key institutional investors.

Tech Giants Nvidia and Microsoft Face Fresh Challenges as Investment Firms Think Twice About Holding

Технологичните гиганти Nvidia и Microsoft са изправени пред нови предизвикателства, тъй като инвестиционните дружества обмислят два пъти да задържат

Techničtí giganti Nvidia a Microsoft čelí novým výzvám, protože investiční společnosti dvakrát přemýšlejí o holdingu

Tech Giants Nvidia og Microsoft står over for nye udfordringer, mens investeringsselskaber tænker to gange om at holde

Die Technologiegiganten Nvidia und Microsoft stehen vor neuen Herausforderungen, da Investmentfirmen zweimal überlegen, ob sie ihre Aktien halten sollen.

Los gigantes tecnológicos Nvidia y Microsoft enfrentan nuevos desafíos mientras las firmas de inversión piensan dos veces antes de mantener su posición

Les géants de la technologie Nvidia et Microsoft font face à de nouveaux défis alors que les sociétés d'investissement réfléchissent à deux fois avant de détenir

I giganti della tecnologia Nvidia e Microsoft affrontano nuove sfide mentre le società di investimento ci pensano due volte prima di detenere azioni

Techgiganten Nvidia en Microsoft staan voor nieuwe uitdagingen, aangezien investeringsmaatschappijen twee keer nadenken over het aanhouden van

Giganci technologiczni Nvidia i Microsoft stają przed nowymi wyzwaniami, ponieważ firmy inwestycyjne dwa razy zastanawiają się nad posiadaniem

Giganții tehnologici Nvidia și Microsoft se confruntă cu noi provocări, deoarece firmele de investiții se gândesc de două ori la holding

Technologickí giganti Nvidia a Microsoft čelia novým výzvam, keďže investičné spoločnosti dvakrát premýšľajú o holdingu

Techjättarna Nvidia och Microsoft står inför nya utmaningar när värdepappersföretag tänker två gånger på innehav

Tips and Insights From a Successful SDE-2 Application: Microsoft Engineer Interview (Offer 2024)

Hello JavaScript Enthusiasts!Welcome to the sixth edition of "This Week in JavaScript"! Today, we’ve got some game-changing updates from Microsoft, the long-awaited Svelte 5 release, and the new Next.js 15 release—plus a whole lot more! Microsoft GenAIScript 2024 has been all about AI, and Microsoft is pushing the boundaries again with GenAIScript. This new tool lets developers use generative AI to automate tasks that traditionally require manual coding.Key Features: Prompt as Code: Automate code summarization, error checking, and data parsing using minimal JavaScript or TypeScript syntax. LLM Tools & Agents: Define tools and agents like Git assistants or weather data fetchers that interact seamlessly with LLM models. By defining these agents, developers can create reusable components that provide intelligent suggestions or perform specific functions based on LLM prompts. File Manipulation: Extract, analyze, and manipulate data from PDFs, DOCX, CSVs, and more, making it ideal for data-heavy projects. Whether it’s converting a PDF to text or extracting tables from CSV files, developers can automate these tedious processes, which are often prone to errors when done manually. GitHub Integration & CI/CD Automation: With built-in support for GitHub Models and Copilot, as well as automated GitHub Actions, developers can leverage LLMs to handle pull request reviews, commit message generation, and even integrate into CI/CD pipelines. Svelte 5 Is Finally Here After 18 months of development, version 5 marks the most significant update in Svelte’s history. This is a complete revamp, focusing on improving app performance, reducing bundle size, and simplifying reactivity.But, what changed? Runes & Reactivity: Introduces "runes" for cleaner reactive state management, replacing the old $: construct. This change simplifies state handling by making dependencies more explicit, avoiding common pitfalls with the previous system. Native TypeScript: Full TypeScript support, no more preprocessors needed. Backward Compatibility: Svelte 5 offers a mostly seamless upgrade from Svelte 4, with migration tools for easy transition. This backward compatibility ensures that developers can migrate gradually, without having to rewrite their entire application from scratch. The migration tools automate much of the process, minimizing downtime. Improved Event Handling: Event handlers are now treated as props, making component composition more intuitive. This change allows developers to more easily manage event propagation and conditional handling, streamlining the creation of reusable components, especially for large applications and libraries. Next.js 15: The Speed King Next.js 15 has finally been released! This version focuses on improving both stability and speed. Here’s all you need to know: @next/codemod CLI: Automates code upgrades, making it easier to update Next.js and React versions. With this tool, you can avoid manual refactoring when upgrading, ensuring your codebase stays clean and efficient. Turbopack Dev: Boosts development speed with up to 96% faster code updates. Turbopack is set to replace Webpack as the default bundler, offering blazing-fast rebuild times, especially in large projects. Static Route Indicators: New visual cues for static routes during development provide immediate feedback, helping you optimize performance for individual pages and track which routes are truly static for better caching and rendering. Automatic Image Optimization Enhancements: Image optimization is now built-in by default, removing the need for manual configuration. This means you get optimized images (including resizing, lazy loading, and WebP support) automatically, allowing developers to focus on building features rather than handling image performance. Tools & Releases You Should Know About Let’s speed-run through some of the other big tool updates this week! React Native 0.76: The new default architecture delivers smoother app performance, improved debugging, and smaller Android app sizes. Bun’s Latest Update: Experimental CSS parsing and bytecode compilation options boost development speed by 2x. Plus, bun publish makes npm package publishing a breeze. ExpressJS v5: After a decade of waiting, Express 5 is here with modernized security features, improved route patterns, and enhanced support for promises. Transformers.js v3: Running machine learning models in JavaScript just got faster thanks to WebGPU support. Now you can execute real-time tasks right in the browser! eslint-plugin-functional: This plugin enforces functional programming principles in JavaScript and TypeScript by blocking mutation and encouraging immutability, helping you write cleaner, more reliable code. That’s a wrap for this week! If you found these JavaScript updates useful, give this post an upvote to help others discover it. Don’t forget to share it with your fellow developers, and keep an eye out for more insights in the JavaScript world. Until next time, keep coding and stay curious! References Microsoft GenAIScript Svelte 5 Update Next.js 15 React Native 0.76 Bun v1.1.33 ExpressJS v5 Transformers.js v3 eslint-plugin-functional Hello JavaScript Enthusiasts! Welcome to the sixth edition of " This Week in JavaScript "! This Week in JavaScript Today, we’ve got some game-changing updates from Microsoft, the long-awaited Svelte 5 release, and the new Next.js 15 release—plus a whole lot more! Microsoft GenAIScript Microsoft GenAIScript 2024 has been all about AI, and Microsoft is pushing the boundaries again with GenAIScript . This new tool lets developers use generative AI to automate tasks that traditionally require manual coding. Key Features: Microsoft GenAIScript Key Features: Prompt as Code: Automate code summarization, error checking, and data parsing using minimal JavaScript or TypeScript syntax. Prompt as Code: Automate code summarization, error checking, and data parsing using minimal JavaScript or TypeScript syntax. Prompt as Code: LLM Tools & Agents: Define tools and agents like Git assistants or weather data fetchers that interact seamlessly with LLM models. By defining these agents, developers can create reusable components that provide intelligent suggestions or perform specific functions based on LLM prompts. LLM Tools & Agents: Define tools and agents like Git assistants or weather data fetchers that interact seamlessly with LLM models. By defining these agents, developers can create reusable components that provide intelligent suggestions or perform specific functions based on LLM prompts. LLM Tools & Agents: File Manipulation: Extract, analyze, and manipulate data from PDFs, DOCX, CSVs, and more, making it ideal for data-heavy projects. Whether it’s converting a PDF to text or extracting tables from CSV files, developers can automate these tedious processes, which are often prone to errors when done manually. File Manipulation: Extract, analyze, and manipulate data from PDFs, DOCX, CSVs, and more, making it ideal for data-heavy projects. Whether it’s converting a PDF to text or extracting tables from CSV files, developers can automate these tedious processes, which are often prone to errors when done manually. File Manipulation: GitHub Integration & CI/CD Automation: With built-in support for GitHub Models and Copilot, as well as automated GitHub Actions, developers can leverage LLMs to handle pull request reviews, commit message generation, and even integrate into CI/CD pipelines. GitHub Integration & CI/CD Automation: With built-in support for GitHub Models and Copilot, as well as automated GitHub Actions, developers can leverage LLMs to handle pull request reviews, commit message generation, and even integrate into CI/CD pipelines. GitHub Integration & CI/CD Automation: Svelte 5 Is Finally Here Svelte 5 Is Finally Here After 18 months of development, version 5 marks the most significant update in Svelte ’s history. This is a complete revamp, focusing on improving app performance, reducing bundle size, and simplifying reactivity. But, what changed? Svelte But, what changed? Runes & Reactivity: Introduces "runes" for cleaner reactive state management, replacing the old $: construct. This change simplifies state handling by making dependencies more explicit, avoiding common pitfalls with the previous system. Runes & Reactivity: Introduces "runes" for cleaner reactive state management, replacing the old $: construct. This change simplifies state handling by making dependencies more explicit, avoiding common pitfalls with the previous system. Runes & Reactivity: Native TypeScript: Full TypeScript support, no more preprocessors needed. Native TypeScript: Full TypeScript support, no more preprocessors needed. Native TypeScript: Backward Compatibility: Svelte 5 offers a mostly seamless upgrade from Svelte 4, with migration tools for easy transition. This backward compatibility ensures that developers can migrate gradually, without having to rewrite their entire application from scratch. The migration tools automate much of the process, minimizing downtime. Backward Compatibility: Svelte 5 offers a mostly seamless upgrade from Svelte 4, with migration tools for easy transition. This backward compatibility ensures that developers can migrate gradually, without having to rewrite their entire application from scratch. The migration tools automate much of the process, minimizing downtime. Backward Compatibility: Improved Event Handling: Event handlers are now treated as props, making component composition more intuitive. This change allows developers to more easily manage event propagation and conditional handling, streamlining the creation of reusable components, especially for large applications and libraries. Improved Event Handling: Event handlers are now treated as props, making component composition more intuitive. This change allows developers to more easily manage event propagation and conditional handling, streamlining the creation of reusable components, especially for large applications and libraries. Improved Event Handling: Next.js 15: The Speed King Next.js 15: The Speed King Next.js 15 has finally been released! This version focuses on improving both stability and speed. Next.js 15 Here’s all you need to know: Here’s all you need to know: @next/codemod CLI: Automates code upgrades, making it easier to update Next.js and React versions. With this tool, you can avoid manual refactoring when upgrading, ensuring your codebase stays clean and efficient. @next/codemod CLI: Automates code upgrades, making it easier to update Next.js and React versions. With this tool, you can avoid manual refactoring when upgrading, ensuring your codebase stays clean and efficient. @next/codemod CLI: Turbopack Dev: Boosts development speed with up to 96% faster code updates. Turbopack is set to replace Webpack as the default bundler, offering blazing-fast rebuild times, especially in large projects. Turbopack Dev: Boosts development speed with up to 96% faster code updates. Turbopack is set to replace Webpack as the default bundler, offering blazing-fast rebuild times, especially in large projects. Turbopack Dev: Static Route Indicators: New visual cues for static routes during development provide immediate feedback, helping you optimize performance for individual pages and track which routes are truly static for better caching and rendering. Static Route Indicators: New visual cues for static routes during development provide immediate feedback, helping you optimize performance for individual pages and track which routes are truly static for better caching and rendering. Static Route Indicators: Automatic Image Optimization Enhancements: Image optimization is now built-in by default, removing the need for manual configuration. This means you get optimized images (including resizing, lazy loading, and WebP support) automatically, allowing developers to focus on building features rather than handling image performance. Automatic Image Optimization Enhancements: Image optimization is now built-in by default, removing the need for manual configuration. This means you get optimized images (including resizing, lazy loading, and WebP support) automatically, allowing developers to focus on building features rather than handling image performance. Automatic Image Optimization Enhancements: Tools & Releases You Should Know About Tools & Releases You Should Know About Let’s speed-run through some of the other big tool updates this week! React Native 0.76: The new default architecture delivers smoother app performance, improved debugging, and smaller Android app sizes. React Native 0.76: The new default architecture delivers smoother app performance, improved debugging, and smaller Android app sizes. React Native 0.76: Bun’s Latest Update: Experimental CSS parsing and bytecode compilation options boost development speed by 2x. Plus, bun publish makes npm package publishing a breeze. Bun’s Latest Update: Experimental CSS parsing and bytecode compilation options boost development speed by 2x. Plus, bun publish makes npm package publishing a breeze. Bun’s Latest Update: ExpressJS v5: After a decade of waiting, Express 5 is here with modernized security features, improved route patterns, and enhanced support for promises. ExpressJS v5: After a decade of waiting, Express 5 is here with modernized security features, improved route patterns, and enhanced support for promises. ExpressJS v5: Transformers.js v3: Running machine learning models in JavaScript just got faster thanks to WebGPU support. Now you can execute real-time tasks right in the browser! Transformers.js v3: Running machine learning models in JavaScript just got faster thanks to WebGPU support. Now you can execute real-time tasks right in the browser! Transformers.js v3: eslint-plugin-functional: This plugin enforces functional programming principles in JavaScript and TypeScript by blocking mutation and encouraging immutability, helping you write cleaner, more reliable code. eslint-plugin-functional: This plugin enforces functional programming principles in JavaScript and TypeScript by blocking mutation and encouraging immutability, helping you write cleaner, more reliable code. eslint-plugin-functional: That’s a wrap for this week! If you found these JavaScript updates useful, give this post an upvote to help others discover it. Don’t forget to share it with your fellow developers, and keep an eye out for more insights in the JavaScript world. Until next time, keep coding and stay curious! References Microsoft GenAIScript Microsoft GenAIScript Svelte 5 Update Svelte 5 Update Next.js 15 Next.js 15 React Native 0.76 React Native 0.76 Bun v1.1.33 Bun v1.1.33 ExpressJS v5 ExpressJS v5 Transformers.js v3 Transformers.js v3 eslint-plugin-functional eslint-plugin-functional

Generative AI in JavaScript? Microsoft GenAIScript, Svelte 5, Next.js 15 and More - This Week in JS

So, let’s dive into the drama: Microsoft is laying the blame squarely on Delta for its epic struggle to bounce back from that global cyber outage that had the airline canceling over 6,000 flights. Yep, you read that right—6,000! The conflicting accounts from Delta Air Lines, cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, and Microsoft have erupted into a blame game filled with legal threats. This situation highlights one of the consequences of a world increasingly reliant on a few key technology providers. Here’s the lowdown: Last month, CrowdStrike, a global cybersecurity firm, rolled out a software update that caused some serious chaos for Microsoft’s clientele, including a bunch of airlines. While other major US carriers managed to get their act together the next day, Delta was still floundering. Microsoft’s initial findings suggest that Delta, unlike its peers, hadn’t exactly kept up with the times regarding IT infrastructure. In other words, their tech setup might be a bit of a dinosaur compared to others. Delta, not taking this lying down, has roped in the big guns—David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner—to seek damages from both CrowdStrike and Microsoft. They’re not just asking for a little something; they’re gunning for serious compensation. Delta’s CEO, Ed Bastian, took to CNBC last week to air some grievances, saying that both Microsoft and CrowdStrike had dropped the ball on providing “exceptional service.” He even went as far as to label Microsoft’s platform as the “most fragile.” Bastian declared that the airline, which leads the U.S. in revenue, has “no choice” but to take legal action against the two tech firms. With an estimated $500 million in damages from lost revenue and refunds due to flight delays and cancellations, Bastian emphasized that pursuing legal recourse is the only viable option. Microsoft’s lawyer has accused Delta of presenting a “false picture” of its actions following the July CrowdStrike outage. Mark Cheffo, a Microsoft lawyer, wasn’t having any of it. He fired back, calling Delta’s accusations “incomplete, false, misleading, and damaging to Microsoft and its reputation.” According to Cheffo, Microsoft’s software wasn’t the culprit behind the CrowdStrike mess, but they did offer help—free of charge!—which Delta apparently ignored. Cheffo also claimed Microsoft’s CEO, Satya Nadella, reached out to Bastian directly via email and got nothing but crickets in return. CrowdStrike, which was responsible for initiating the outage on Microsoft Windows systems with a problematic update, pushed back on Sunday. In a letter reviewed by Axios, the company “strongly rejects” any claims of gross negligence or willful misconduct related to the outage.


The letter also warns that if Delta proceeds with its “public threat of litigation,” the airline will need to justify to the public, its shareholders, and possibly a jury why CrowdStrike accepted responsibility for its actions while Delta did not.


Meanwhile, CrowdStrike is already contending with a proposed class action lawsuit from affected air travelers. Microsoft says it repeatedly tried to lend a hand after the outage, but Delta turned them down. Apparently, Delta was using other tech providers for crew-tracking and scheduling, which Microsoft thinks might be why Delta refused their help. Cheffo made it clear that if Delta decides to sue, Microsoft will be ready to “vigorously” defend itself. And CrowdStrike is also pushing back, stating that their CEO personally offered on-site assistance to Delta’s CEO, which, you guessed it, went unanswered. Here's the latest: On Tuesday, Microsoft sent a letter to Delta outlining what it claims are communications demonstrating Delta's refusal of Microsoft's assistance. According to Microsoft, this refusal was likely due to Delta relying on IBM or other tech companies for support with its downed crew-tracking and scheduling systems. So, let’s dive into the drama: Microsoft is laying the blame squarely on Delta for its epic struggle to bounce back from that global cyber outage that had the airline canceling over 6,000 flights. Yep, you read that right—6,000! Delta The conflicting accounts from Delta Air Lines, cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, and Microsoft have erupted into a blame game filled with legal threats. This situation highlights one of the consequences of a world increasingly reliant on a few key technology providers. Here’s the lowdown: Last month, CrowdStrike , a global cybersecurity firm, rolled out a software update that caused some serious chaos for Microsoft’s clientele, including a bunch of airlines. While other major US carriers managed to get their act together the next day, Delta was still floundering. CrowdStrike other major US Microsoft’s initial findings suggest that Delta, unlike its peers, hadn’t exactly kept up with the times regarding IT infrastructure. In other words, their tech setup might be a bit of a dinosaur compared to others. Delta, not taking this lying down, has roped in the big guns—David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner—to seek damages from both CrowdStrike and Microsoft. They’re not just asking for a little something; they’re gunning for serious compensation. Delta’s CEO, Ed Bastian, took to CNBC last week to air some grievances, saying that both Microsoft and CrowdStrike had dropped the ball on providing “exceptional service.” He even went as far as to label Microsoft’s platform as the “most fragile.” Bastian declared that the airline, which leads the U.S. in revenue, has “no choice” but to take legal action against the two tech firms. With an estimated $500 million in damages from lost revenue and refunds due to flight delays and cancellations, Bastian emphasized that pursuing legal recourse is the only viable option. legal action Microsoft’s lawyer has accused Delta of presenting a “false picture” of its actions following the July CrowdStrike outage. Mark Cheffo, a Microsoft lawyer, wasn’t having any of it. He fired back, calling Delta’s accusations “incomplete, false, misleading, and damaging to Microsoft and its reputation.” According to Cheffo, Microsoft’s software wasn’t the culprit behind the CrowdStrike mess, but they did offer help—free of charge!—which Delta apparently ignored. Cheffo also claimed Microsoft’s CEO, Satya Nadella, reached out to Bastian directly via email and got nothing but crickets in return. CrowdStrike, which was responsible for initiating the outage on Microsoft Windows systems with a problematic update, pushed back on Sunday. In a letter reviewed by Axios, the company “strongly rejects” any claims of gross negligence or willful misconduct related to the outage. The letter also warns that if Delta proceeds with its “public threat of litigation,” the airline will need to justify to the public, its shareholders, and possibly a jury why CrowdStrike accepted responsibility for its actions while Delta did not. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike is already contending with a proposed class action lawsuit from affected air travelers. CrowdStrike, which was responsible for initiating the outage on Microsoft Windows systems with a problematic update, pushed back on Sunday. In a letter reviewed by Axios, the company “strongly rejects” any claims of gross negligence or willful misconduct related to the outage. CrowdStrike, which was responsible for initiating the outage on Microsoft Windows systems with a problematic update, pushed back on Sunday. In a letter reviewed by Axios, the company “strongly rejects” any claims of gross negligence or willful misconduct related to the outage. The letter also warns that if Delta proceeds with its “public threat of litigation,” the airline will need to justify to the public, its shareholders, and possibly a jury why CrowdStrike accepted responsibility for its actions while Delta did not. The letter also warns that if Delta proceeds with its “public threat of litigation,” the airline will need to justify to the public, its shareholders, and possibly a jury why CrowdStrike accepted responsibility for its actions while Delta did not. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike is already contending with a proposed class action lawsuit from affected air travelers. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike is already contending with a proposed class action lawsuit from affected air travelers. Microsoft says it repeatedly tried to lend a hand after the outage, but Delta turned them down. Apparently, Delta was using other tech providers for crew-tracking and scheduling, which Microsoft thinks might be why Delta refused their help. Cheffo made it clear that if Delta decides to sue, Microsoft will be ready to “vigorously” defend itself. And CrowdStrike is also pushing back, stating that their CEO personally offered on-site assistance to Delta’s CEO, which, you guessed it, went unanswered. Here's the latest: On Tuesday, Microsoft sent a letter to Delta outlining what it claims are communications demonstrating Delta's refusal of Microsoft's assistance. According to Microsoft, this refusal was likely due to Delta relying on IBM or other tech companies for support with its downed crew-tracking and scheduling systems.

Microsoft Rips Into Delta Airlines For Sluggish Recovery After Global CrowdStrike Outage

Microsoft and ARM: A Rocky Romance A Decade in the Making

মাইক্রোসফ্ট এবং এআরএম: একটি রকি রোমান্স একটি দশক তৈরিতে

Microsoft und ARM: Eine schwierige Romanze, die sich über ein Jahrzehnt entwickelt hat

Microsoft y ARM: un romance complicado que lleva una década en desarrollo

Microsoft et ARM : une histoire d'amour mouvementée qui dure une décennie

माइक्रोसॉफ्ट और ARM: एक दशक से चल रहा एक कठिन रिश्ता

マイクロソフトと ARM: 10 年にわたる困難なロマンス

Microsoft와 ARM: 10년 간의 험난한 로맨스

Microsoft e ARM: um romance rochoso, uma década em construção

Microsoft и ARM: непростая история: десятилетие в пути

Microsoft ve ARM: On Yıldır Süregelen Kayalık Bir Romantizm

Microsoft và ARM: Một mối tình lãng mạn Một thập kỷ hình thành

微软与 ARM：十年磨一剑的爱情故事

Allow me to state the obvious: as recent technological advancements go, few innovations have the potential to as profoundly as AI does. We have already witnessed its evolution from a buzzword to a fully productized tool (mostly for low-value tasks). Next step: conquering the office to complement and enhance everyday white collar workers. reshape our work and productivity used by 100 million people A research paper titled “ ” comes at a crucial juncture. Authored by a team from Microsoft, including (Senior Research Director), (Director of Applied Science), (Chief Economist), and others, the paper delves into the impact of AI, specifically LLMs, on workplace productivity, using Microsoft’s own Copilot as a case study. Given its provenance, this study should be taken with a pinch of salt… but nevertheless offer fascinating insights. Early LLM-based Tools for Enterprise Information Workers Likely Provide Meaningful Boosts to Productivity Alexia Cambon Brent Hecht Ben Edelman Focusing on “common enterprise information worker tasks for which LLMs are most likely to provide significant value” (email/intranet information retrieval, content creation, meeting summarization…), the research demonstrates that Copilot tools can significantly increase productivity, primarily by accelerating task execution without compromising quality. The paper underscores that users who have experienced these tools show a greater willingness to pay, reflecting perceived value initial expectations. above Key takeaways from the study ​​Copilot tools lead to a marked increase in task execution speed without a notable decrease in quality. Users who have interacted with LLM-based tools show a higher willingness to pay for them, indicating that these tools offer value beyond initial expectations. The research anticipates broader application across various tasks and roles, hinting at a future where AI’s role in productivity is more pervasive. What do we do with that information? Based on the paper’s findings, it seems clear that organizations will charge forward with AI implementation in the coming months. Should that be the case, I believe managers need to implement three “no-brainer” actions before moving ahead. Firstly, organizations need to establish clear “ ” integration standards. Fernando Lucini (from Accenture) akin to those in established industries, ensuring clear responsibilities and accountability. It’s also crucial to train employees comprehensively and establish formal AI processes similar to standard practices in other professional fields. AI literacy should be democratized across organizations, ensuring all departments, even those not directly working with AI, are well-informed about the technology and its applications. This approach can build trust and facilitate smoother integration of AI into various business processes. workplace AI highlights the importance of professionalizing AI roles Secondly, quality assurance protocols must be implemented to ensure the reliability and ethical use of AI in the workplace. A robust should cover six quality zones: . These parameters ensure the AI model’s completeness, correctness, accuracy, resource efficiency, adaptability, and transparency. Regular testing and certification of AI models based on these zones can help maintain high standards, safeguarding against issues like data security breaches and ensuring that AI tools are both effective and understandable to users​. framework functional suitability, efficiency, portability, maintainability, security, and usability Lastly (and in line with my first point), . Comprehensive AI training ensures that employees are not only able to use AI tools effectively but are also equipped to handle issues and make informed decisions when deviations from AI suggestions are necessary​. training programs are vital to enabling employees to adapt to and efficiently use AI technology Too soon to draw conclusions While the paper provides valuable insights, it has limitations. The research predominantly focuses on tasks that are already AI-friendly, potentially overlooking areas where AI integration might be more challenging. Moreover, the scope is limited to English-speaking contexts, which may not reflect global workforce diversity. Finally… it’s from Microsoft. And the company has every reason to pump up its own stock by claiming its solutions are the future of work. The research by Microsoft offers a glimpse into a future where AI significantly bolsters workplace productivity. While challenges and limitations exist, the potential for AI to revolutionize how we work is undeniable. With careful integration and regulation, we stand on the brink of a major productivity leap, spearheaded by AI advancements. Good luck out there. Also published . here

Is Microsoft's AI Copilot the Future of Work?

The court filing for The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation on December 27, 2023 is part of . Navigate any part of this filing . Below is the table of links to all parts. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here 1:23-cv-11195 Case Number: The New York Times Company Plaintiffs: Microsoft Corporation, OpenAI Defendant: December 27, 2023 Filing Date: United States District Court Southern District of New York Location: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. NATURE OF THE ACTION II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE III. THE PARTIES IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS A. The New York Times and its Mission 1. Nearly Two Centuries of High-Quality, Original, Independent News 2. Pioneering, In-Depth Journalism and Breaking News at Significant Cost 3. A Dedication to Quality Journalism 4. GenAI Products Pose a Threat to High-Quality Journalism B. Defendants’ GenAI Products 1. A Business Model Rooted in Mass Copyright Infringement 2. The Functioning of GenAI Models C. Defendants’ Unauthorized Use and Reproduction of Times Content 1. Unauthorized Duplication of Times Works During GPT Model Training 2. Incorporation of Unauthorized Reproductions and Derivatives of Times Works in GPT Models 3. Unauthorized Public Exhibition of Times Works in GPT Product Outputs 4. Unauthorized Acquisition and Distribution of Current News 5. Deliberate Infringement

Read the Entire The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation and OpenAI Court Case

পুরো নিউ ইয়র্ক টাইমস কোম্পানি বনাম মাইক্রোসফট কর্পোরেশন এবং ওপেনএআই কোর্ট কেস পড়ুন

Lesen Sie den gesamten Gerichtsfall The New York Times Company gegen Microsoft Corporation und OpenAI

Lea el caso judicial completo de The New York Times Company contra Microsoft Corporation y OpenAI

Lire l'intégralité de l'affaire The New York Times Company c. Microsoft Corporation et OpenAI

संपूर्ण न्यूयॉर्क टाइम्स कंपनी बनाम माइक्रोसॉफ्ट कॉर्पोरेशन और ओपनएआई कोर्ट केस पढ़ें

The New York Times Company 対 Microsoft Corporation および OpenAI の訴訟全体を読む

The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation 및 OpenAI 법원 사건 전체를 읽어보세요.

Leia todo o caso The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation e OpenAI

Прочитать полностью Судебное дело The New York Times Company против Microsoft Corporation и OpenAI

The New York Times Company - Microsoft Corporation ve OpenAI Davası Davasının Tamamını Okuyun

Đọc toàn bộ vụ việc Công ty New York Times kiện Tập đoàn Microsoft và Vụ kiện tại Tòa án OpenAI

阅读整个《纽约时报公司》诉微软公司和 OpenAI 法庭案件

The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation Court Filing December 27, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 1 of 27. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Plaintiff The New York Times Company (“The Times”), by its attorneys Susman Godfrey LLP and Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., for its complaint against Defendants Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) and OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI LP, OpenAI GP LLC, OpenAI LLC, OpenAI OpCo LLC, OpenAI Global LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC, (collectively “OpenAI” and, with Microsoft, “Defendants”), alleges as follows: I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Independent journalism is vital to our democracy. It is also increasingly rare and valuable. For more than 170 years, The Times has given the world deeply reported, expert, independent journalism. Times journalists go where the story is, often at great risk and cost, to inform the public about important and pressing issues. They bear witness to conflict and disasters, provide accountability for the use of power, and illuminate truths that would otherwise go unseen. Their essential work is made possible through the efforts of a large and expensive organization that provides legal, security, and operational support, as well as editors who ensure their journalism meets the highest standards of accuracy and fairness. This work has always been important. But within a damaged information ecosystem that is awash in unreliable content, The Times’s journalism provides a service that has grown even more valuable to the public by supplying trustworthy information, news analysis, and commentary. 2. Defendants’ unlawful use of The Times’s work to create artificial intelligence products that compete with it threatens The Times’s ability to provide that service. Defendants’ generative artificial intelligence (“GenAI”) tools rely on large-language models (“LLMs”) that were built by copying and using millions of The Times’s copyrighted news articles, in-depth investigations, opinion pieces, reviews, how-to guides, and more. While Defendants engaged in widescale copying from many sources, they gave Times content particular emphasis when building their LLMs—revealing a preference that recognizes the value of those works. Through Microsoft’s Bing Chat (recently rebranded as “Copilot”) and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Defendants seek to free-ride on The Times’s massive investment in its journalism by using it to build substitutive products without permission or payment. 3. The Constitution and the Copyright Act recognize the critical importance of giving creators exclusive rights over their works. Since our nation’s founding, strong copyright protection has empowered those who gather and report news to secure the fruits of their labor and investment. Copyright law protects The Times’s expressive, original journalism, including, but not limited to, its millions of articles that have registered copyrights. 4. Defendants have refused to recognize this protection. Powered by LLMs containing copies of Times content, Defendants’ GenAI tools can generate output that recites Times content verbatim, closely summarizes it, and mimics its expressive style, as demonstrated by scores of examples. See Exhibit J. These tools also wrongly attribute false information to The Times. 5. Defendants also use Microsoft’s Bing search index, which copies and categorizes The Times’s online content, to generate responses that contain verbatim excerpts and detailed summaries of Times articles that are significantly longer and more detailed than those returned by traditional search engines. By providing Times content without The Times’s permission or authorization, Defendants’ tools undermine and damage The Times’s relationship with its readers and deprive The Times of subscription, licensing, advertising, and affiliate revenue. 6. Using the valuable intellectual property of others in these ways without paying for it has been extremely lucrative for Defendants. Microsoft’s deployment of Times-trained LLMs throughout its product line helped boost its market capitalization by a trillion dollars in the past year alone. And OpenAI’s release of ChatGPT has driven its valuation to as high as $90 billion. Defendants’ GenAI business interests are deeply intertwined, with Microsoft recently highlighting that its use of OpenAI’s “best-in-class frontier models” has generated customers—including “leading AI startups”—for Microsoft’s Azure AI product.[1] 7. The Times objected after it discovered that Defendants were using Times content without permission to develop their models and tools. For months, The Times has attempted to reach a negotiated agreement with Defendants, in accordance with its history of working productively with large technology platforms to permit the use of its content in new digital products (including the news products developed by Google, Meta, and Apple). The Times’s goal during these negotiations was to ensure it received fair value for the use of its content, facilitate the continuation of a healthy news ecosystem, and help develop GenAI technology in a responsible way that benefits society and supports a well-informed public. 8. These negotiations have not led to a resolution. Publicly, Defendants insist that their conduct is protected as “fair use” because their unlicensed use of copyrighted content to train GenAI models serves a new “transformative” purpose. But there is nothing “transformative” about using The Times’s content without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it. Because the outputs of Defendants’GenAI models compete with and closely mimic the inputs used to train them, copying Times works for that purpose is not fair use. 9. The law does not permit the kind of systematic and competitive infringement that Defendants have committed. This action seeks to hold them responsible for the billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages that they owe for the unlawful copying and use of The Times’s uniquely valuable works. Continue Reading . Here [1] Microsoft Fiscal Year 2024 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call, MICROSOFT INVESTOR RELATIONS (Oct. 24, 2023), https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/events/FY-2024/earnings-fy-2024-q1.aspx. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-11195 retrieved on December 29, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. nycto-assets.nytimes.com

The Times v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Unlawful Use of The Times’s Work to Create AI Products (1)

দ্য টাইমস বনাম মাইক্রোসফ্ট/ওপেনএআই: এআই পণ্য তৈরি করতে টাইমসের কাজের বেআইনি ব্যবহার (1)

The Times vs. Microsoft/OpenAI: Unrechtmäßige Nutzung der Arbeit der Times zur Entwicklung von KI-Produkten (1)

The Times contra Microsoft/OpenAI: uso ilegal del trabajo del Times para crear productos de IA (1)

The Times contre Microsoft/OpenAI : Utilisation illégale des travaux du Times pour créer des produits d’IA (1)

द टाइम्स बनाम माइक्रोसॉफ्ट/ओपनएआई: एआई उत्पाद बनाने के लिए द टाइम्स के काम का गैरकानूनी उपयोग (1)

The Times 対 Microsoft/OpenAI: AI 製品を作成するための The Times の著作物の違法使用 (1)

The Times 대 Microsoft/OpenAI: AI 제품 제작을 위한 The Times의 작업 불법 사용(1)

The Times v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Uso ilegal do trabalho do The Times para criar produtos de IA (1)

The Times против Microsoft/OpenAI: незаконное использование работ The Times для создания продуктов искусственного интеллекта (1)

The Times - Microsoft/OpenAI: The Times'ın Çalışmalarının Yapay Zeka Ürünleri Oluşturmak İçin Yasa Dışı Kullanımı (1)

The Times kiện Microsoft/OpenAI: Sử dụng trái phép tác phẩm của The Times để tạo ra các sản phẩm AI (1)

《泰晤士报》诉微软/OpenAI：非法使用《泰晤士报》的作品来创建人工智能产品 (1)

The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation Court Filing December 27, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 3 of 27. here III. THE PARTIES 14. Plaintiff The New York Times Company is a New York corporation with its headquarters and principal place of business in New York. The Times publishes digital and print products, including its core news product, The New York Times, which is available on its mobile applications, on its website (NYTimes.com), and as a printed newspaper, and associated content such as its podcasts. The Times also publishes other interest-specific publications, including The Athletic (sports media), Cooking (recipes and other cooking-related content), Games (puzzles and games), and Wirecutter (shopping recommendations). The Times owns over 3 million registered, copyrighted works, including those set forth in Exhibits A–I, K (“Times Works”). 15. Microsoft Corporation is a Washington corporation with a principal place of business and headquarters in Redmond, Washington. Microsoft has invested at least $13 billion in OpenAI Global LLC in exchange for which Microsoft will receive 75% of that company’s profits until its investment is repaid, after which Microsoft will own a 49% stake in that company. 16. Microsoft has described its relationship with the OpenAI Defendants as a “partnership.” This partnership has included contributing and operating the cloud computing services used to copy Times Works and train the OpenAI Defendants’ GenAI models. It has also included, upon information and belief, substantial technical collaboration on the creation of those models. Microsoft possesses copies of, or obtains preferential access to, the OpenAI Defendants’ latest GenAI models that have been trained on and embody unauthorized copies of the Times Works. Microsoft uses these models to provide infringing content and, at times, misinformation to users of its products and online services. During a quarterly earnings call in October 2023, Microsoft noted that “more than 18,000 organizations now use Azure OpenAI Service, including new-to-Azure customers.” 17. The OpenAI Defendants consist of a web of interrelated Delaware entities. 18. Defendant OpenAI Inc. is a Delaware nonprofit corporation with a principal place of business located at 3180 18th Street, San Francisco, California. OpenAI Inc. was formed in December 2015. OpenAI Inc. indirectly owns and controls all other OpenAI entities and has been directly involved in perpetrating the mass infringement and other unlawful conduct alleged here. 19. Defendant OpenAI LP is a Delaware limited partnership with its principal place of business located at 3180 18th Street, San Francisco, California. OpenAI LP was formed in 2019. OpenAI LP is a wholly owned subsidiary of OpenAI Inc. that is operated for profit and is controlled by OpenAI Inc. OpenAI LP was directly involved in perpetrating the mass infringement and commercial exploitation of Times Works alleged here. 20. Defendant OpenAI GP, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business located at 3180 18th Street, San Francisco, California. OpenAI GP, LLC is the general partner of OpenAI LP, and it manages and operates the day-to-day business and affairs of OpenAI LP. OpenAI GP LLC is wholly owned and controlled by OpenAI Inc. OpenAI, Inc. uses OpenAI GP LLC to control OpenAI LP and OpenAI Global, LLC. OpenAI GP, LLC was involved in perpetrating the mass infringement and unlawful exploitation of Times Works alleged here through its direction and control of OpenAI LP and OpenAI Global LLC. 21. Defendant OpenAI, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business located at 3180 18th Street, San Francisco, California. OpenAI, LLC was formed in September 2020. OpenAI LLC owns, sells, licenses, and monetizes a number of OpenAI’s offerings, including ChatGPT, ChatGPT Enterprise, and OpenAI’s API tools, all of which were built on OpenAI’s mass infringement and unlawful exploitation of Times Works. Upon information and belief, OpenAI, LLC is owned and controlled by both OpenAI Inc. and Microsoft Corporation, through OpenAI Global LLC and OpenAI OpCo LLC. 22. Defendant OpenAI OpCo LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business located at 3180 18th Street, San Francisco, California. OpenAI OpCo LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of OpenAI Inc. and has facilitated and directed OpenAI’s mass infringement and unlawful exploitation of Times Works through its management and direction of OpenAI, LLC. 23. Defendant OpenAI Global LLC is a Delaware limited liability company formed in December 2022. OpenAI Global LLC has a principal place of business located at 3180 18th Street, San Francisco, California. Microsoft Corporation has a minority stake in OpenAI Global LLC and OpenAI, Inc. has a majority stake in OpenAI Global LLC, indirectly through OpenAI Holdings LLC and OAI Corporation, LLC. OpenAI Global LLC was and is involved in unlawful conduct alleged herein through its ownership, control, and direction of OpenAI LLC. 24. Defendant OAI Corporation, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business located at 3180 18th Street, San Francisco, California. OAI Corporation, LLC’s sole member is OpenAI Holdings, LLC. OAI Corporation, LLC was and is involved in the unlawful conduct alleged herein through its ownership, control, and direction of OpenAI Global LLC and OpenAI LLC. 25. Defendant OpenAI Holdings, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company, whose sole members are OpenAI, Inc. and Aestas, LLC, whose sole member, in turn, is Aestas Management Company, LLC. Aestas Management Company, LLC is a Delaware shell company formed for the purpose of executing a $495 million capital raise for OpenAI. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-11195 retrieved on December 29, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. nycto-assets.nytimes.com

The Times v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Substantial Technical Collaboration on the Creation of the Models (3)

টাইমস বনাম মাইক্রোসফ্ট/ওপেনএআই: মডেল তৈরির বিষয়ে যথেষ্ট প্রযুক্তিগত সহযোগিতা (3)

The Times vs. Microsoft/OpenAI: Umfangreiche technische Zusammenarbeit bei der Erstellung der Modelle (3)

The Times v. Microsoft/OpenAI: colaboración técnica sustancial en la creación de los modelos (3)

The Times contre Microsoft/OpenAI : collaboration technique substantielle sur la création des modèles (3)

द टाइम्स बनाम माइक्रोसॉफ्ट/ओपनएआई: मॉडलों के निर्माण पर पर्याप्त तकनीकी सहयोग (3)

タイムズ対マイクロソフト/OpenAI: モデル作成における実質的な技術協力 (3)

The Times 대 Microsoft/OpenAI: 모델 생성에 대한 실질적인 기술 협력(3)

The Times v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Colaboração Técnica Substancial na Criação dos Modelos (3)

The Times против Microsoft/OpenAI: существенное техническое сотрудничество при создании моделей (3)

The Times - Microsoft/OpenAI: Modellerin Oluşturulmasına İlişkin Önemli Teknik İşbirliği (3)

The Times v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Hợp tác kỹ thuật đáng kể để tạo ra các mô hình (3)

《泰晤士报》诉 Microsoft/OpenAI：模型创建方面的实质性技术合作 (3)

Stories, News & Mentions about MICROSOFT

Microsoft’s Stories on HackerNoon

Microsoft's News & Mentions