Lumix Japan issues an apology after it was discovered using images taken on <strong>Canon</strong>, Nikon and Tamron kit on its website

Panasonic apologizes after being caught using photos taken on Canon, Nikon and Tamron kit | Digital Camera World

In this installment of "Loose Canon," Ellen Yang explores advice columns of the past and how the genre has been reshaped to fit today's consumerist, literary habits.

Loose Canon: How advice columns were reborn online

Electronics sales in the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) region continue to grow, despite the fact that global electronics sales have slowed down signi..

Online sales of electronics in Mena grew by 7% in 2023

Consumer electronics is expected to be the largest application segment ... ON Semiconductor, STMicroelectronics, and Canon. These players are investing heavily in research and development to develop new and innovative CMOS and sCMOS image sensors.

Global CMOS And SCMOS Image Sensor Market Profile And Industry Analysis, Key Players Forecast, 2023 To 2030 By Mobility Foresights Themarketpublicist

TOKYO (AP) — TOKYO (AP) — Canon Inc. (CAJPY) on Thursday reported third-quarter profit of $414.2 million. The Tokyo-based company said it had profit of 42 cents per share. The office machine company posted revenue of $6.83 billion in the period.

Canon: Q3 Earnings Snapshot

Canon’s new imageFORMULA DR-S250N Office Document Scanner is now available for purchase via select Canon partners for an MSRP of $895.00 *. For more information and the full list of product specifications, visit https://usa.canon.com.

Office Scanning Made Easy with Canon’s New Powerhouse Scanner

If you plan on recording video, you'll want to know the key differences between mirrorless cameras, DSLRs, and camcorders.

Mirrorless vs. DSLR vs. Camcorder: Which Is Best for Video?

More signs that Canon is making a mirrorless retro camera, as it asks customers which classic body to resurrect

Canon asks customers which classic film camera it should bring back!

Canon Japan shows all EOS M cameras as discontinued models, formally bringing the end of the EF-M system, after eleven years.

Canon Japan formally discontinues the last EOS-M cameras, saying goodbye to EF-M

Canon

canon

Alternative Canonicalizations Expand Chemical Similarity Search Capabilities

Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction Preliminaries


Proposed Approach
3.1 Notation
3.2 Nueral Networks on SPD Manifolds
3.3 MLR in Structure Spaces
3.4 Neural Networks on Grassmann Manifolds


Experiments


Conclusion and References A. Notations B. MLR in Structure Spaces C. Formulation of MLR from the Perspective of Distances to Hyperplanes D. Human Action Recognition E. Node Classification F. Limitations of our work G. Some Related Definitions H. Computation of Canonical Representation I. Proof of Proposition 3.2 J. Proof of Proposition 3.4 K. Proof of Proposition 3.5 L. Proof of Proposition 3.6 M. Proof of Proposition 3.11 N. Proof of Proposition 3.12 H COMPUTATION OF CANONICAL REPRESENTATIONS Authors:
(1) Xuan Son Nguyen, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (xuan-son.nguyen@ensea.fr);
(2) Shuo Yang, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (son.nguyen@ensea.fr);
(3) Aymeric Histace, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (aymeric.histace@ensea.fr). This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction Abstract and 1. Introduction Preliminaries Proposed Approach
3.1 Notation
3.2 Nueral Networks on SPD Manifolds
3.3 MLR in Structure Spaces
3.4 Neural Networks on Grassmann Manifolds Experiments Conclusion and References Preliminaries Preliminaries Preliminaries Proposed Approach 3.1 Notation 3.2 Nueral Networks on SPD Manifolds 3.3 MLR in Structure Spaces 3.4 Neural Networks on Grassmann Manifolds Proposed Approach 3.1 Notation 3.1 Notation 3.2 Nueral Networks on SPD Manifolds 3.2 Nueral Networks on SPD Manifolds 3.3 MLR in Structure Spaces 3.3 MLR in Structure Spaces 3.4 Neural Networks on Grassmann Manifolds 3.4 Neural Networks on Grassmann Manifolds Experiments Experiments Experiments Conclusion and References Conclusion and References Conclusion and References A. Notations A. Notations B. MLR in Structure Spaces B. MLR in Structure Spaces C. Formulation of MLR from the Perspective of Distances to Hyperplanes C. Formulation of MLR from the Perspective of Distances to Hyperplanes D. Human Action Recognition D. Human Action Recognition E. Node Classification E. Node Classification F. Limitations of our work F. Limitations of our work G. Some Related Definitions G. Some Related Definitions H. Computation of Canonical Representation H. Computation of Canonical Representation I. Proof of Proposition 3.2 I. Proof of Proposition 3.2 J. Proof of Proposition 3.4 J. Proof of Proposition 3.4 K. Proof of Proposition 3.5 K. Proof of Proposition 3.5 L. Proof of Proposition 3.6 L. Proof of Proposition 3.6 M. Proof of Proposition 3.11 M. Proof of Proposition 3.11 N. Proof of Proposition 3.12 N. Proof of Proposition 3.12 H COMPUTATION OF CANONICAL REPRESENTATIONS Authors: (1) Xuan Son Nguyen, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (xuan-son.nguyen@ensea.fr); (2) Shuo Yang, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (son.nguyen@ensea.fr); (3) Aymeric Histace, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (aymeric.histace@ensea.fr). Authors: Authors: (1) Xuan Son Nguyen, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (xuan-son.nguyen@ensea.fr); (2) Shuo Yang, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (son.nguyen@ensea.fr); (3) Aymeric Histace, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France (aymeric.histace@ensea.fr). This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. available on arxiv available on arxiv

Canonical Representations and Computation in SPD Matrices

Let’s talk about something that’s been driving me nuts for years: Google’s ongoing struggles with handling canonical URLs and duplicate content. It’s a problem that, despite being fundamental to search engine optimization (SEO), Google still can’t seem to get right. And while Google continues to flounder, guess who’s quietly acing it? Bing. Yes, you read that right – Bing! It’s honestly baffling. Here we are, in 2024, and Google, the self-proclaimed king of search, can’t even get the basics of web indexing straight. Let’s break this down. The Canonical URL Catastrophe A canonical URL is meant to tell search engines which version of a page is the “official” one when you have multiple URLs with similar or identical content. Seems simple enough, right? You’d think Google, with all its technological might and years of search engine dominance, would have perfected this by now. But nope. Google’s handling of canonical tags is, more often than not, a dumpster fire. Why? Because Google has a tendency to ignore your carefully placed canonical tags, or worse, it just gets them wrong. It might pick the wrong version of your page, or even worse – it might randomly declare some other URL as the canonical without any explanation. This leads to pages getting improperly indexed, with duplicate content spread across multiple URLs and absolutely no way for you to control it. Result? Your rankings plummet, your SEO strategy crumbles, and your site’s traffic tanks – all thanks to Google’s refusal to play by the canonical rulebook. But, oh, here’s where it gets good. Bing? Bing doesn’t have these problems. Bing can crawl your site, see your canonical tag, and follow it like a well-behaved child. It doesn’t second-guess you, doesn’t ignore your instructions, and doesn’t make arbitrary decisions that hurt your visibility. Bing understands that when a site owner points to a canonical URL, that’s what it should respect. It’s as if Bing actually listens to website owners, while Google seems to be playing SEO bingo with your site’s content. Duplicate Content Woes Then there’s duplicate content. Another area where Google’s “genius” just falls flat. We all know duplicate content is a big issue when it comes to SEO. When search engines find multiple copies of the same content, they’re supposed to figure out which one is the most relevant and display it in search results. Seems simple, right? Well, it’s not. Google has been notorious for misidentifying duplicate content, sometimes even penalizing sites with pages that have only slight variations. I’ve seen it happen time and again: you publish a well-researched article, and somehow, Google finds another page on your site and decides they’re too similar, tanking your rankings. Why does this happen? It’s because Google’s algorithm, despite being incredibly complex, still can’t reliably handle duplicate content in certain situations. There are cases where Google just can’t seem to distinguish between genuinely different pages and what’s essentially the same content presented slightly differently – even if those pages are clearly differentiated by their canonical tags or intended purpose. The result? Duplicate content penalties, frustrated webmasters, and a whole lot of wasted time trying to get Google to "understand" your site. Now, Bing? Bing doesn’t overcomplicate things. It doesn’t see minor content variations and freak out like Google does. It doesn’t penalize you for every slight difference between two pages that have the same general topic. Instead, Bing takes a more balanced approach to identifying and handling duplicate content. You won’t find yourself scrambling to fix duplicate content issues that Google invented in the first place. It just works. The Moral of the Story Why is Bing, a search engine that many still dismiss, consistently getting the basics right while Google is out here making life unnecessarily difficult for website owners? The answer is simple: Google is overcomplicating things, and it’s failing to acknowledge the importance of consistency and accuracy in indexing and content management. In contrast, Bing seems to have a more grounded, practical approach. Bing might not dominate the search engine market the way Google does, but at least when it comes to handling canonical URLs and duplicate content, Bing is getting it right. It’s time for Google to stop pretending that its “complex algorithms” are the answer to everything. Sometimes, simplicity works better. Maybe it’s time for Google to take a page out of Bing’s playbook and fix the very issues that have been plaguing SEO professionals for years. Because if Bing can get it right, there’s absolutely no excuse for Google to keep getting it wrong. Let’s talk about something that’s been driving me nuts for years: Google’s ongoing struggles with handling canonical URLs and duplicate content. It’s a problem that, despite being fundamental to search engine optimization (SEO), Google still can’t seem to get right. And while Google continues to flounder, guess who’s quietly acing it? Bing. Yes, you read that right – Bing! And while Google continues to flounder, guess who’s quietly acing it? Bing. Yes, you read that right – Bing! It’s honestly baffling. Here we are, in 2024, and Google, the self-proclaimed king of search, can’t even get the basics of web indexing straight. Let’s break this down. The Canonical URL Catastrophe A canonical URL is meant to tell search engines which version of a page is the “official” one when you have multiple URLs with similar or identical content. Seems simple enough, right? You’d think Google, with all its technological might and years of search engine dominance, would have perfected this by now. But nope. Google’s handling of canonical tags is, more often than not, a dumpster fire. Why? Because Google has a tendency to ignore your carefully placed canonical tags, or worse, it just gets them wrong. It might pick the wrong version of your page, or even worse – it might randomly declare some other URL as the canonical without any explanation. ignore randomly This leads to pages getting improperly indexed, with duplicate content spread across multiple URLs and absolutely no way for you to control it. Result? Your rankings plummet, your SEO strategy crumbles, and your site’s traffic tanks – all thanks to Google’s refusal to play by the canonical rulebook. SEO strategy But, oh, here’s where it gets good. Bing ? Bing doesn’t have these problems. Bing can crawl your site, see your canonical tag, and follow it like a well-behaved child. It doesn’t second-guess you, doesn’t ignore your instructions, and doesn’t make arbitrary decisions that hurt your visibility. Bing Bing understands that when a site owner points to a canonical URL, that’s what it should respect. It’s as if Bing actually listens to website owners, while Google seems to be playing SEO bingo with your site’s content. Duplicate Content Woes Then there’s duplicate content. Another area where Google’s “genius” just falls flat. We all know duplicate content is a big issue when it comes to SEO. When search engines find multiple copies of the same content, they’re supposed to figure out which one is the most relevant and display it in search results. Seems simple, right? Well, it’s not. Google has been notorious for misidentifying duplicate content, sometimes even penalizing sites with pages that have only slight variations. I’ve seen it happen time and again: you publish a well-researched article, and somehow, Google finds another page on your site and decides they’re too similar, tanking your rankings. Why does this happen? It’s because Google’s algorithm, despite being incredibly complex, still can’t reliably handle duplicate content in certain situations. There are cases where Google just can’t seem to distinguish between genuinely different pages and what’s essentially the same content presented slightly differently – even if those pages are clearly differentiated by their canonical tags or intended purpose. The result? Duplicate content penalties, frustrated webmasters, and a whole lot of wasted time trying to get Google to "understand" your site. Now, Bing? Bing doesn’t overcomplicate things. It doesn’t see minor content variations and freak out like Google does. It doesn’t penalize you for every slight difference between two pages that have the same general topic. Instead, Bing takes a more balanced approach to identifying and handling duplicate content. You won’t find yourself scrambling to fix duplicate content issues that Google invented in the first place. It just works. The Moral of the Story Why is Bing, a search engine that many still dismiss, consistently getting the basics right while Google is out here making life unnecessarily difficult for website owners? The answer is simple: Google is overcomplicating things, and it’s failing to acknowledge the importance of consistency and accuracy in indexing and content management . Google is overcomplicating things, and it’s failing to acknowledge the importance of consistency and accuracy in indexing and content management In contrast, Bing seems to have a more grounded, practical approach. Bing might not dominate the search engine market the way Google does, but at least when it comes to handling canonical URLs and duplicate content, Bing is getting it right. It’s time for Google to stop pretending that its “complex algorithms” are the answer to everything. Sometimes, simplicity works better. Maybe it’s time for Google to take a page out of Bing’s playbook and fix the very issues that have been plaguing SEO professionals for years. Because if Bing can get it right, there’s absolutely no excuse for Google to keep getting it wrong.

Why Bing Doesn’t Struggle with Canonical URLs and Duplicate Content, But Google Does!

Author:
(1) CALLA TSCHANZ. Table of Links Abstract and Intro
Background on tropical perspective
The expanded construction
GIT stability
Stack perspective
The canonical moduli stack
References 6. The canonical moduli stack 6.1 Properness and Deligne-Mumford property Existence and uniqueness of limits for special objects. We need to establish some definitions before we prove the following auxiliary result on existence and uniqueness of limits for special elements, i.e. when the fibre Xη over the generic point of S is a modified special fibre itself. We start by proving existence and uniqueness of limits in the first case using the valuative criterion. Let V denote the irreducible component of Xη in the interior of which P lies. Notice that since P tends towards a codimension greater or equal to one stratum of X, then in order for its limit to be smoothly supported in an extension of (Zη, Xη), it will be necessary to expand out at least one ∆-component in this extension. There exists a smoothing from the interior of V in the fibre over the generic point to the interior of this expanded ∆-component in such an extension of (Zη, Xη) if and only if this ∆-component is equal to V in the fibre over the generic point. Moreover, if there is no such ∆-component equal to V, then none of the x, y or z coordinates can tend towards zero (because both sides of the defining equations must tend towards zero). Deligne-Mumford property. Finally we show that both stacks of stable objects constructed have finite automorphisms. Proof. This follows directly from the results of this section. 6.2 An isomorphism of stacks We will need also the following result from Alper and Kresch [AK16]. Now we are in a position to prove the following theorem: This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Author: (1) CALLA TSCHANZ. Author: Author: (1) CALLA TSCHANZ. Table of Links Abstract and Intro Background on tropical perspective The expanded construction GIT stability Stack perspective The canonical moduli stack References Abstract and Intro Abstract and Intro Background on tropical perspective Background on tropical perspective The expanded construction The expanded construction GIT stability GIT stability Stack perspective Stack perspective The canonical moduli stack The canonical moduli stack References References 6. The canonical moduli stack 6.1 Properness and Deligne-Mumford property Existence and uniqueness of limits for special objects. We need to establish some definitions before we prove the following auxiliary result on existence and uniqueness of limits for special elements, i.e. when the fibre Xη over the generic point of S is a modified special fibre itself. Existence and uniqueness of limits for special objects. We start by proving existence and uniqueness of limits in the first case using the valuative criterion. Let V denote the irreducible component of Xη in the interior of which P lies. Notice that since P tends towards a codimension greater or equal to one stratum of X, then in order for its limit to be smoothly supported in an extension of (Zη, Xη), it will be necessary to expand out at least one ∆-component in this extension. There exists a smoothing from the interior of V in the fibre over the generic point to the interior of this expanded ∆-component in such an extension of (Zη, Xη) if and only if this ∆-component is equal to V in the fibre over the generic point. Moreover, if there is no such ∆-component equal to V, then none of the x, y or z coordinates can tend towards zero (because both sides of the defining equations must tend towards zero). Deligne-Mumford property. Finally we show that both stacks of stable objects constructed have finite automorphisms. Deligne-Mumford property. Proof . This follows directly from the results of this section. Proof 6.2 An isomorphism of stacks We will need also the following result from Alper and Kresch [AK16]. Now we are in a position to prove the following theorem: This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. available on arxiv

Expansions for Hilbert Schemes: the Canonical Moduli Stack

হিলবার্ট স্কিমগুলির সম্প্রসারণ: ক্যানোনিকাল মডুলি স্ট্যাক

Erweiterungen für Hilbert-Schemata: der kanonische Modulstapel

Ampliaciones para esquemas de Hilbert: la pila de módulos canónicos

Extensions pour les schémas de Hilbert : la pile de modules canoniques

हिल्बर्ट योजनाओं के लिए विस्तार: कैनोनिकल मोडुली स्टैक

ヒルベルトスキームの展開: 標準モジュライスタック

힐베르트 방식의 확장: 정규 모듈러스 스택(Canonical Moduli Stack)

Expansões para esquemas de Hilbert: a pilha de módulos canônicos

Разложения схем Гильберта: стек канонических модулей

Hilbert Şemaları için Genişletmeler: Kanonik Modül Yığını

Mở rộng cho các sơ đồ Hilbert: Ngăn xếp mô-đun Canonical

希尔伯特方案的扩展：规范模数堆栈

What comes to mind when you think of the word “boring”? A few years ago, if you’d asked marketers, they would’ve laughed and said business-to-business marketing. In 2024, things might have changed for better or worse(?). I’ll let you decide. One fine Saturday evening, a marketer on LinkedIn called out HubSpot’s social media profiles as idiotic and stirred quite a frenzy. To some, the post ‘seemed’ like a shade to Gen Z—as seems to be the case among the ‘booming’ generations—so they made sure the poster knew how “out of touch” they were. But as you’ll notice from the engagement numbers and comments, the post had supporters as well. Now, I don’t indulge in slander on social media, but the comments had me hooked for a good 10 minutes. And then fleeing off to to see what all the fuss was about. Hubspot’s page Here’s a little sneak peek for y'all. For a second there, I had to do a double take. Were the posts ? Sure. But this was quite uncharacteristic of the brand I’ve always known HubSpot to be: helpful, friendly, and sympathetic. funny These were straight-up “we’re trying to appeal to Gen Z” posts. But do you blame them? By 2025, nearly will comprise Gen Z. And from the looks of it, the strategy seems to be working spectacularly. 27% of the current workforce HubSpot recently crossed one million followers on LinkedIn, a feat few have managed in the B2B space. Their engagement numbers are also visibly soaring across social media. They’re trying to do what most B2B brands do when they’re called boring — Switch to humor This brilliant gives a snapshot of how Gen Z is stereotypically represented. infographic by McCrindle If you consider the image above, you can easily make the connection between Gen Z preferences and HubSpot’s social feeds. They’re using small cases and slang like the Zoomers Indulge in shitposting to share “relatable” moments for marketers and sales pros More video content Informative and visually appealing carousels Product and partnership updates Bouncing on the latest pop culture moment Then shitposting some more This is what you’d call being “unhinged”—something you’ll notice only B2C brands execute on social media. And that is why the amount of engagement HubSpot has garnered following the switch in strategy is so interesting. Most upcoming B2B brands don’t find creative inspiration from past examples. They find the usual by-the-book, monotonous stuff because no one’s innovating anymore. They’re all following the same playbooks as everyone else. As , a seasoned content marketer, also highlights in his : Jason Patterson LinkedIn article “When people talk about the top B2B brands, they’ll point to IBM, GE, HPE, Cisco, and the like. But those companies are old (or have old origins). Few remember how they were built anymore. And they aren’t so much building their brands at this point as maintaining them, or repositioning them.” Now, I wouldn’t go as far as to call HubSpot’s new social strategy “innovative”— as some supporters have. Tuning into humor is a classic tactic to be less boring. But it’s definitely a glitch-in-the-matrix event coming from a billion-dollar B2B company. So naturally, it’s going to have a ripple effect. Or maybe, it already has. In the End—It’s Your Audience That Knows Best Ever wondered why B2B marketing is so dry? I feel the opinion is mostly held in contrast to the emotionally charged marketing common in B2C. But another, more reasonable argument is that B2B audiences generally have a disinterest (even scorn) for any “fluff” marketing. They want the information in a direct, concise manner, without the bells and whistles. Unfortunately for marketers, that often spells boring, corporate-speak. Or so they think. Coming back to HubSpot’s example—amid the naysayers and the supporters, one commenter rightly pointed out the best way to approach the criticism: In the end, business-to-business is also people-to-people marketing. And while some may appreciate (even love) a humorous, witty approach to marketing—some might not. It’s for you to find out what works and resonates with audience. your HubSpot sells a collection of horizontal products to a wide range of industries. So they can market to everyone, anyone. That’s the reason their current social media strategy seems like it’s working. If a company selling niche software were to copy the same formula, it would probably look tone-deaf and waste marketing dollars. So if I were to leave you with any piece of advice, it’s this: Listen to your audience. Talk to them, because they know best. P.S. In case you’re wondering—a “canon event” according to the comes “from the movie (Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse) it is an inevitable event or action good or bad that is supposed to happen that results your future self.” Urban Dictionary Please ask a Gen Z for further details!

Why HubSpot Going ‘Unhinged’ on LinkedIn is a Canon Event for B2B

কেন HubSpot LinkedIn-এ 'Unhinged' হচ্ছে B2B-এর জন্য একটি ক্যানন ইভেন্ট

Warum HubSpot auf LinkedIn „aus den Angeln gehoben“ wird, ist ein Canon-Event für B2B

Por qué HubSpot se vuelve "desquiciado" en LinkedIn es un evento de Canon para B2B

Pourquoi HubSpot devient « déséquilibré » sur LinkedIn est un événement Canon pour le B2B

लिंक्डइन पर हबस्पॉट 'अनहिंग्ड' क्यों हो रहा है, यह बी2बी के लिए एक कैनन इवेंट है

LinkedIn 上で HubSpot が「不安定」になる理由が B2B 向けのキヤノン イベントである理由

LinkedIn에서 HubSpot이 'Unhinged'되는 이유는 B2B를 위한 캐논 이벤트입니다.

Por que o HubSpot está ‘desequilibrado’ no LinkedIn é um evento da Canon para B2B

Почему HubSpot «расшатывается» на LinkedIn — это событие Canon для B2B

HubSpot'un LinkedIn'de 'Hinged' Olması Neden B2B için bir Canon Etkinliğidir?

Tại sao HubSpot lại 'không hoạt động' trên LinkedIn là một sự kiện của Canon dành cho B2B

为什么 HubSpot 在 LinkedIn 上“疯狂”是 B2B 的经典事件

When you repost stories on HackerNoon, we offer canonical linking for individuals looking to grow their personal sites. All you need to do is add the link to the original story in this box in your story settings: Canonical Linking Rules 4.c.i. - Canonical Links to Company Domain Canonical links to company domain must come from company account If the original source of the story lives on a company’s domain (ex: ), that company needs to repost the story from a branded Google account in order to get a canonical link. https://ai.googleblog.com/ The only exception to the rule above is if company founders/executives have marketing strategies around building a personal brand to promote their company. In that case, the founder or executive must get approval from the HackerNoon team to publish under their personal HN profile instead of one owned by the company. 4.c.ii. - No Canonical Links to Blog Networks or Social Networks We do not allow canonical links to blog networks or social networks (ex: wordpress.com, reddit.com, linkedin.com, medium.com). The point of our canonical links is to help the writer’s domain or the company’s domain grow. When you host your blog on a subdomain owned by another company, you are powering their domain and their brand, not yours. canonical links to david.com are ok! Canonical links to david.wordpress.com are not allowed. Put simply: Editing Protocol Index: Editing Protocol Overview Second Human Rule Verified Writers Time to Review Standards of Quality Originality Score 6 Ws Score Objectivity in ranked listicles Unranked listicles Actionable advice Red Flags Subject Matter Subject matter saturation Plagiarism Sources and Citations Formatting is bad or broken Grammar level: gibberish Story is Too Short Backlink Rules & Guidelines Backlink Limits Backlink quality and diversity Diversity of sources Internal linking Changing links Reposting and Canonical Linking Canonical links to company domain Canonical links to blog networks or social networks

Reposting and Canonical Linking

Reenvío y enlace canónico

Repostage et lien canonique

रीपोस्टिंग और कैननिकल लिंकिंग

再投稿と正規リンク

Repostagem e link canônico

Đăng lại và liên kết Canonical

重新发布和规范链接

Hey Hackers! On April 13th, Canon, the camera and photography giant, announced that they will be launching an NFT Marketplace, called , offering tokenized photographs. Cadabra Cadabra is described as a curated photography marketplace that offers NFTs from a variety of innovative creators. Canon states that the goal of the Cadabra marketplace is “to empower creators by connecting them to enthusiastic collectors who celebrate the art of photography through a shared appreciation for these digital artworks”. Decrypt has that the NFT marketplace will be launched on the Ethereum network. reported “The digital art will range from landscape, wildlife, lifestyle, sports, abstract, and other categories to spotlight the stunning work of the invited creators.” - Canon USA Canon also took to to announce the exciting news to it’s customers and followers. Twitter On Cadabra, the NFT photos will be minted by Creator drops, and there will reportedly be a secondary marketplace for NFT collectors to trade their minted NFTs. Canon has stated that Cadabra creators will have the choice of offering “purchasers prints” with their initial drops, which entitles NFT purchasers to also receive a physical print of the NFT image. Based off the small amount of information we have about Cadabra, it does sound like there will be intuitive options for creators to present their work and possibly even earn a good amount. There is no official word on when Cadbara will be launched, but Canon did allude that it will be later this year. Canon has also stated that the Cadbara marketplace will only be available in the United States at launch, but they will be expanding the project internationally in the future. Last but not least, Canon has confirmed that both cryptocurrency, as well as debit and credit cards, will be accepted as payment options on Cadabra. Here is the direct link to sign up for Cadabra news and updates: https://shortstack.usa.canon.com/cadabra What are your thoughts on this news? Do you think this NFT Marketplace could be a big player? Are you interested in Photography? Will you be signing up for Cadabra when it launches? Check out my Socials: https://linktr.ee/zerorequiem0x See ya! :) Also published . here

Canon Throws Hat in the NFT Ring With Cadabra: a Curated Marketplace for Tokenized Photography

The subject of canonical reference has been touched thousand times. But since some content writers are still making the same mistake over and over, I think it's beneficial to add one more. I hope to reach some who aren't aware of it. Content writing is not enough Writing content is not enough: you can have written the best blog post of the century; it's no good if nobody sees it. One has two ways to spread the word: Link to the post on social media Copy the post to another site The problem happens when copying the content. The problem of content duplication Search engines want to provide users with the most relevant content for their search. They need to order search results to provide more relevant results first. Duplicate content poses the problem of which content to display first. It's a minor issue when it's on the same domain: the search engine will decide, and that's all. The same happens across domains, but the consequences are worse. If another site decides to copy your content, how will the search engine decide which one to list first? My experience has shown me that the most domain wins. Importance depends on the exact search engine, but generally, sites with more audience are considered more important. important My previous bad crossposting experience I started my blog in April 2018. As with every young blood out there, the beginning was very tedious: I was overjoyed the first time I had 100 visits in a single day! Then, in June 2019, I was approached by DZone to become a "Most Valuable Blogger": DZone would publish all my posts. For me, it meant the world. People recognized the content I wrote as being "worthy" enough. Since there would be a link to the original article, I was also counting on getting a slight boost in audience. At that time, I was hosting my blog on WordPress and trying to balance the costs with AdSense ads: the more audience, the better the balance. For the record, I stopped advertisements as soon as I migrated to Jekyll and GitLab pages. Then, some years ago, a friend did a Google search and stumbled upon one of my posts on DZone. Interestingly, the DZone copy was the first one found, while the original one was at the top of the second page. I stopped my cooperation with DZone on the spot. Setting things right There's a single thing to do to set things right. All of a page should set the attribute: copies <link rel="canonical"> A canonical link element is an HTML element that helps webmasters prevent duplicate content issues in search engine optimization by specifying the "canonical" or "preferred" version of a web page. It is described in RFC 6596, which went live in April 2012. Search engines try to utilize canonical link definitions as an output filter for their search results. If multiple URLs contain the same content in the result set, the canonical link URL definitions will likely be incorporated to determine the original source of the content. "For example, when Google finds identical content instances, it decides to show one of them. Its choice of the resource to display in the search results will depend upon the search query." According to Google, the link element is not considered to be a directive, but rather a hint that the ranking algorithm will "honor strongly." canonical -- Canonical link element At the time, I looked at my posts on DZone, and their canonical links pointed to DZone. Conclusion To keep one's original content at the top of search results, a content writer should only crosspost to sites that allow setting the attribute. I crosspost to a couple of other sites with this feature: , , (it finally added it), , , and . <link rel="canonical"> dev.to Hashnode DZone Medium Foojay HackerNoon If you want to avoid your blog being flagged as duplicate by search engines, you must: avoid content aggregators that don't allow setting the attribute rel=canonical use it! Also published . here

Grow Your Audience With Rel=canonical

Enjoying vast popularity in the world, Canon printers have acquired up to 17 percent of the market share in the year 2020-2021. What do you think makes it such a popular printer brand? The features! Canon printers are versatile printers available to perform functions, including printing, scanning, copying, and more. Moreover, Canon is counted among the reliable printer brands available around the world. However, despite the reliability, Canon printers may sometimes get weariness in their components and parts featured in them. Its machinery gets impacted due to various factors and results in the issues in its printing in the various forms. One such issue includes the Canon Printer Not Printing Black Issue in which your printer is reluctant to print black ink onto your printed documents. Reasons for Canon Printer Not Printing Black Issue Some of the primary causes of Canon printer not printing black error include the following: Sometimes when you have not been using your printer for several days, that’s when your ink cartridge may end up drying, or specifically black ink. Also, some of the times the cartridge has liquid ink while your printer attempts to execute the printing with the dried-up print head, with no output on the paper. Also, your ink cartridge may turn out to be the culprit causing this type of error. Using an outdated version of the Canon printer may also be one reason for the Canon printer not printing black issue Canon Printer Not Printing Black resolving techniques This issue can be gotten rid of using the following techniques: Clean your printer You may possibly get away without having to try any tricky technical solution to deal with the Canon printer not printing black error. All you need to do is open your printer and clean in detail each of its parts, internally as well as externally. To do this, follow the steps given below: Firstly, open your printer. Ensure loading your paper tray with at least 5 or more A4 size papers. Pull out the output tray along with its extension. Go to the Setup option to start cleaning your printer. In the setup screen, click on the tools icon. Scroll through the Toolbox to locate Maintenance Menu, and then press OK. The Maintenance Menu opens up. Here, select Deep Cleaning and then press OK. Select Yes to confirm the cleaning and continue by pressing OK. This will get the printer to start cleaning. Once the process gets completed, restart your printer to check if the issue has gone. Use original cartridges If you are currently using a duplicate ink cartridge in your printer, you may come across the Canon printer not printing black error. It’s because Canon does not guarantee the use of ink cartridge replica to be productive enough to serve your purpose. Therefore, if there is a duplicate cartridge in your printer, replace it with the original one, immediately. Replace the problematic cartridges This process includes three ways- Find the replaceable cartridge Check out the color blacks on the test print results. If you see anything problematic, your black ink cartridge is in problem. Replace the cartridge with issues Put some papers on the paper loader tray. Turn your printer on. Now check the ink cartridge door. Remove the cartridge carefully. Now remove the seal from the new cartridge Insert the new cartridge into the ink nozzles. Adjust the cartridge in its slot until you hear a click sound. Once installed, close the cartridge door. Printer alignment Turn your printer on ensuring there are papers in the tray. Click the Next button to open Set Up. Open the tools using the right arrow, and click OK to continue. The printer alignment page opens up. Close the lid and then press the OK button to successfully align your printer. Wait until your printer scans the alignment sheet to complete the process. Update your printer driver Most of your printer problems may arise due to an outdated or corrupted printer driver on your system. Therefore, you need to check whether the driver you are currently using is updated or not. If it is outdated, update your driver immediately. For this, you can visit Canon’s website and find and download the suitable driver for your Canon printer model. Also published . here

Resolving Canon Printer Not Printing Black Issue

An awful headline, I know but it's true. I was curious how the Corona Virus had effected traffic for some of the large media publications in the UK and whilst taking a look at the top 10 news sites, I came across something interesting. Is the BBC using to grab more organic traffic or is it an SEO quick fix for something that has gone unaddressed for years? shady tactics Anyone who juggles clients or who works for a large company knows that there is always work to do. Much of a task schedule is a matter of prioritisation and triage. What's the most important thing, that needs to be done yesterday? Are the BBC using a trick to generate more organic visitors and if so, should the UK national broadcaster be operating in such a manner? So what are BBC News doing to grab hundreds of thousands of extra visitors per month? Ranking The Same Page Twice For Numerous Terms The BBC's server set up, has all of its category pages duplicated and ranking for multiple terms. https: // www.bbc.com /news/ /world https:/ /www.bbc.com/ news/world https: // www.bbc.com /news/ /england https:/ /www.bbc.com/ news/england https: // www.bbc.com /news/ /uk https:/ /www.bbc.com/ news/uk And as far as I can see, it's been like this for a long time. Judging from the number of , it looks like they have tested changing things at various points. 301s shown in the Wayback Machine The duplicated link is canonicalised to the main URL as shown below but still tagged . index The canonical tag doesn't stop them from ranking for some very large keywords. Below Ahrefs shows that the canonicalised version is sitting at position 6 for the keyword today's news (70,000 monthly) in the UK. The same goes for the larger keyword "world news" (222,000 monthly) in position 6. On closer inspection, the BBC are taking up both position #1 and a lower position 5/6 for using this trick/bug/exploit/mistake. thousands of keywords If I was doing SEO for the BBC, would I want to fix an issue that could be generating an extra 8-12% of traffic from all these searches? Probably not. The canonical is supposed to indicate to the search engines, that one page's content is similar to another's and indicate the primary source to be ranked. Maybe when you reach the levels of trust and authority that the BBC.com has, things work differently. As a public service, should the BBC be limiting the choice of the public by taking up two positions via this hack? And can you do the same for your site? The only way to know for sure, is to test. Also by Murrough Foley on Hacker Noon . Also Read: SEO, Data Science & Correlative Analysis For Google Organic Traffic

Stories, News & Mentions about CANON

Canon’s Stories on HackerNoon

Canon's News & Mentions