Anytime

anytime

This is my first article—I’m trying to learn this craft. It’s a compilation of comments I’ve made on various platforms across the web. I’ve tried to make some sense of an inherently fragmented discussion. Hope this helps ease your concerns about all the AI hype. This is my first article—I’m trying to learn this craft. It’s a compilation of comments I’ve made on various platforms across the web. I’ve tried to make some sense of an inherently fragmented discussion. Hope this helps ease your concerns about all the AI hype. Stone Soups I don’t know how to cook, at least not at the level of people who claim they can. But I do have plenty of experience with "Vibe Cooking." I could probably teach a class on it. I know how to fry an egg and make instant noodles; I know you need to add a bit of water when reheating rice and that butter is better than oil or margarine when frying an egg. Nothing more sophisticated to report. I know how to boil water, throw in some noodles (without the seasoning packet because it’s pure sodium), add some tomato sauce, and mix in whatever leftovers I have from the previous day. I season it with salt, oregano, and parsley if I have any, plus some pepper. If there’s ground beef, great. If not, a hot dog or boiled egg will do—I handle that in a parallel task. If I’m feeling extra creative, I throw in some beans and crispy potato sticks. The result is the famous "stone soup" dish. It’s funny to watch, maybe even TikTok-worthy, but I won’t be opening a restaurant or making money off it—unless, of course, I had thousands of followers. Since I’m a nobody in the grand scheme of things, I just make it for myself. And it gets the job done because I don’t enjoy cooking and have no desire to learn. Influencers might strike gold here. Plenty of them are blowing up on Instagram and TikTok doing worse. It’s probably just a bandwagon effect—I don’t see it as a sustainable business. But it’s fascinating to watch. X/@levesio recently shared his goal of making $1 million ARR with his fly-game, built entirely through vibe coding. A pretty profitable stone soup. I’m keeping a close eye on it to figure all this out. Vibe Cooking (Coding) Isn't a Threat No top chef has ever lost sleep over the rise of kitchen gadgets or the industrialization of instant noodles. Plenty of regular folks are making vibe-cooking meals at home with ramen and pasta. The upside: They don’t have to spend money eating out. And yet, restaurants are still packed, and food trucks still line the streets next to hot dog stands. I compare AI assistants to kitchen appliances like microwaves, using the same perspective as Chef Gordon Ramsay: they’re incredibly useful, but if you rely on them for everything, your food will turn out awful. Just knowing how to use a microwave or an air fryer doesn’t make you a chef. Top chefs still own professional knife sets because so much of their work is hands-on and artisanal. That won’t change anytime soon. The same goes for programming—especially when it comes to game development, which is almost an art form. Vibe coding has brought a lot of curious newcomers into the tech field—the so-called citizen developers—and that’s great. Encouraging people to learn programming and creating job opportunities benefits any country. I see huge potential in improving tools for vibe coding. Maybe soon, we’ll get better approaches to handling the non-deterministic nature of LLMs. But I don’t think many of them will stick around. At first, it’s fun—until the AI stops "vibing," and you actually have to roll up your sleeves and dive into the code. Coding can be tedious for some; it requires methodical thinking. I’ve already seen posts from people who built a SaaS and lost patience fixing bugs. Now they just want to sell it and move on. SaaS That’s why I’m not convinced that vibe coding is a sustainable business model for citizen developers. Coding is just one piece of the puzzle—most people don’t understand how we can sit for eight hours staring at a screen, “chewing” through code. Computer science has evolved massively over the last few decades; there’s a lot to learn, and the technical jargon alone is intimidating. But I could be wrong. As I said, I’m watching this space closely because it’s fascinating. The AI Boogeyman Back in the ’90s, CASE tools and code generators stirred up the same kind of panic. Marketers swore programming jobs would disappear. They sold well at first, mostly due to psychological pressure rather than real utility. But soon, people got fed up with "programming" because they weren’t cut out for it—or didn’t want to learn something new. And when maintenance time came around, no one wanted to sit down and fix the spaghetti code these tools generated. They dumped it on analysts and developers, who usually decided it was better to scrap everything and start over. Now, I see many developers genuinely worried about losing their jobs or struggling to stay in the industry. The rise of vibe coding is making it worse, fueled by AI hype. Big tech and startups are promoting this sensationalism, but programmers aren’t their real target—investors are. That’s why there are so many sketchy AI demos (see: the infamous Devin). It doesn’t matter if it “still” doesn’t work 100%. As long as it wows people, it’s got potential. That’s why billions are being poured into AI—because of its potential. This fear-mongering around junior devs doesn’t make sense. Companies are slashing salaries, cutting hiring, and spreading fear that AI will take over junior roles—all to keep the AI hype going and inflate stock prices. They’re discouraging the next generation. Eventually, it’ll end up like the COBOL market—where the experienced devs are aging out, and no new talent wants in. In my opinion, this entropy is temporary. Things feel chaotic due to the hype, but it will stabilize. AI won’t replace programmers—it’ll push companies to invest more in software development due to the efficiency AI brings. That means more job openings, especially for juniors. But patience is key while this “circus” winds down. Brave New World We’re witnessing another shift in computer programming. We’ll keep coding, but the "modus operandi" will change—just like it did when we moved on from punch cards and floppy disks or when Flash was replaced by HTML5 and modern frontend frameworks. The '90s and early 2000s brought a wave of new programming languages, and I believe we’ll see more in the coming years. Recently, AI has introduced a fresh batch of IDEs and tools, just like the early 2000s gave us Eclipse, Xcode, IntelliJ IDEA, Android Studio, and VS Code. In tech, people don’t cling to the past. (Almost) everyone adapts quickly—it’s part of the job. There’ll probably be even bigger impacts. AI chatting sites are affecting platforms like Stack Overflow and CodeProject, which now face the risk of extinction, just like Google impacted other search engines. Social media is increasingly full of AI-powered bots, YouTube now has AI-made videos, and Spotify is loaded with artificially generated music. The work AI does in coding is still mostly autocomplete, based on what it’s scraped from the web. The other day, I asked ChatGPT to generate a lexer and parser in Python for JavaScript. It spat out a program using the ply library—code that was straight from a GitHub repo. It just copied and pasted someone’s work... ply But these are fascinating times, living through this evolution with these tools at our fingertips. Using the ChatGPT app to practice English fluency is surreal—20 years ago, that’d be sci-fi. And sometimes GitHub Copilot suggests code that blows my mind, like it’s reading my thoughts. That lexer/parser I mentioned? I asked ChatGPT to explain parts of the code, and it did it perfectly, like I was chatting with the repo’s author. A New Evolution in Programming If you, reader, are Gen Z, you don’t have any memory of life without cell phones. I’m Gen X—I lived decades before using a mobile phone and remember what life was like with payphones on the street and a landline at home. I closely followed the impact of smartphones after 2008. It changed the world, made things a lot better, and it’ll get even better with AI. AI assistants in programming are the same deal: there’s no going back—use it or become obsolete; adopt it or turn into a hermit living in the mountains. It won’t replace a developer, but we’ll use it throughout whatever we’re programming. If you work on the Linux kernel, you’ll use it sparingly. If you’re at some corporation, you’ll use it for everything. Java programmers haven’t written constructor methods or getters and setters by hand in ages. It’s all auto-generated (thank you, Lombok!), and no one’s ever cared. An AI assistant like MS Copilot will help a ton with generating code, but we’ll still have to debug, write a lot of code, fix bugs, and so on. Plus, you often need to tweak and thoroughly test whatever it suggests or generates. If you don’t memorize phone numbers, you rely on your phone for that. You’ll become dependent on AI in programming the same way you depend on internet access, running water, gas, and electricity. You rely on banks, credit cards, and supermarkets, and soon you’ll rely on a personalized AI agent. Life goes on... There are still tons of opportunities to explore in IT, and there’ll be even more demand now that AI is “raising the bar.” We’ll see new programming platforms, new phones and computers (quantum chips!), and new professionals in demand, especially in development. Don’t worry about imposter syndrome—just focus on staying updated and knowing enough to critique and fix AI-generated code. Focus on your work, study what interests you, and don’t compare yourself to anyone. Wishing you success!

Vibe Coding and Stone Soup: Why AI Won’t Replace Developers Anytime Soon

When was the last time you used a chatbot? It’s probably more recent than you think. A 2022 survey from Tidio found that of participants had a minimum of one conversation with a chatbot in the last 12 months, and throughout the world, there are roughly 1.5 billion people using chatbots. 88% However, the time of the preprogrammed chatbots—capable of providing five answers— is over: Generative AI and large language models (LLMs) have arrived. And while LLM chatbots are revolutionizing customer service, providing multilingual support, and analyzing data-driven insights—saving businesses millions of dollars—its uses have now diversified and expanded to education, in particular, language learning. Theoretically, LLM chatbots could be the most innovative tool language learning has ever experienced, as they’re interactive, accessible, and affordable. has even claimed they could teach children to read in 18 months rather than years. After all, using an LLM is a more interactive experience as they’re not deterministic, and their answers cannot be controlled. So it’s their capability of absorbing, processing, and creating new data—specializing in the human language—that makes them especially , particularly language learning. Bill Gates applicable to education But will their erratic hallucinations and inaccuracies, caused by the data sets they’ve been trained on and their inability to understand the prompt information, make them unsuitable for teaching? Let’s dive into what makes an LLM chabot tick, its educational use cases, and why it won’t be vying for language teacher jobs yet. The science behind the chatbots The way that chatbots work varies depending on the chatbot; however, in this article, LLMs—a subset of generative AI, like Google’s Bard and OpenAI’s ChatGPT—will be the main focus. However, it’s right to acknowledge where chatbots in language learning have come from, as other famous language apps, such as Duolingo, also use AI chatbots, particularly machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) models. Although, the limitations here are that this type of framework is back-coded, meaning it’s programmed to check and only validate correct answers; it’s deterministic. While this type of question-answer language testing is beneficial when acquiring a new language, LLMs can delve much deeper. LLMs specialize in NLP and can generate and mimic human language, making them ideal for language learning. Real-world uses can include machine translation, text summarization, question-answering systems, chatbots, and content generation—they excel at understanding the context and semantics of text data. And due to their expansive uses, LLMs are characterized by their enormous size and computational requirements as they contain billions of parameters. On the other hand, traditional ML generally focuses on understanding data, making predictions, solving specific tasks from pattern recognition, and labeled and unlabelled data. And within language learning, the applications of ML can vary from speech recognition to fraud detection (finding students who like to cheat) and predictive analytics. It’s best used for tasks where data is structured and represented numerically. And unlike LLMs, traditional ML models are smaller and computationally less demanding, depending on the complexity of the task and the chosen algorithm. LLMs: The new super tool for language classes? In a typical language lesson, a teacher could have anywhere from 8 to 20 students with varying levels (and interests) in the language. So, in a lesson where a teacher may need to answer questions from 50% of the class, this spreads the tutor’s time and energy a little thin. Therefore, LLMs are ideal for teaching the basics, like grasping simple grammar rules and practicing vocabulary. With LLM chatbots, users can use school-sanctioned laptops and ask for grammar rules to be explained as if they were five, 10, or 15 years old, catering to every level of student. Or they can ask for a grammar rule to be explained using football terminology, making it personal for individual students and hence, something they’re more likely to pay attention to. This increased engagement means users are likely to return and practice again. Additionally, LLM chatbots are excellent alternatives for conversation practice as they can mimic a native speaker. Plus, their interactive and entertaining nature is another key reason which keeps people interested. And all teachers know that engagement can be one of the biggest hurdles in language learning. One of the significant benefits of LLM chatbots is their widespread accessibility. Anyone can create an account and access applications such as Chat GPT or Google’s Bard, as they both have competent free versions. So, as long as you have a stable internet connection, any student from around the world can leverage the practical capabilities of an LLM chatbot. However, nothing in life, and AI, is perfect. Unraveling the pitfalls of LLMs in language learning While LLMs are valuable tools for language learning, one of the foundational pillars of grasping a new language is fluency, and this skill cannot be achieved through chatting online with an LLM. As chatbots are mainly based on written communication, they could hinder pronunciation and speaking skills if they’re the only tool used in language learning. Only a human teacher can help students perfect their abilities, provide demonstrations, and, more importantly, corrections. One of the most significant issues surrounding the development of generative AI and LLMs is the AI hallucination state. This occurs when chatbots don’t recognize or understand the question or information they’ve been given. Therefore, they go ‘AWOL’ and start fabricating responses meaning they can provide inaccurate information and may reinforce errors or misconceptions. LLMs absorb data from the internet and then generate new data based on these sources—and since anyone can post on the internet—incorrect and prejudicial information can infiltrate LLMs which struggle to differentiate between fact and fiction. These types of hallucinations can undermine trust, and the BBC reported that . So, when used in an educational setting with children, the non-deterministic aspect of LLMs creates a safeguarding issue. Human teachers must go through rigorous checks to work with children: If similar moderation isn’t applied to LLM chatbots, this could place children in a potentially harmful situation. ChatGPT has been known to ask students for sexy pictures Moreover, learning a language doesn’t only consist of mastering conjugations, tenses, and grammar rules. Language learning encompasses much more, such as cultural understanding, idiomatic expressions, and contextual usage. Although an LLM chatbot can provide some idioms or slang on request, it cannot try to rival a knowledgeable teacher, who, for example, can provide the essential nuances between Spanish-speaking countries. Further to this, generally speaking, students must take the initiative when using a chatbot. Users need to know what prompts to ask, and beginners, for example, are unlikely to possess this knowledge. Additionally, the potential of LLM chatbots to aid students in cheating during exams—such as providing answers or speech recognition capabilities—has prompted some Seattle and California school districts to block platforms like ChatGPT. There’s no denying that generative AI, particularly LLM chatbots, is an incredible tool that is revolutionizing many aspects of business and is on a trajectory to be implemented in schools soon. However, while the model’s accessibility and affordability can overcome two major hurdles when learning a new language, its unpredictable inaccuracies and hallucinations mean that the current technology cannot rival and replace a good language teacher. Generative AI has a significant obstacle to overcome regarding its hallucination issue, but; in the right circumstances, LLMs can be helpful tools for supervised homework and grammar practice. Overall, teachers should be safe in the knowledge that, at present, generative AI won’t be taking over the education system.

Why LLM Chatbots Won’t Be Replacing Language Teachers Any Time Soon

কেন এলএলএম চ্যাটবট শীঘ্রই যে কোনও সময় ভাষা শিক্ষকদের প্রতিস্থাপন করবে না

Warum LLM-Chatbots in absehbarer Zeit keine Sprachlehrer ersetzen werden

Por qué los chatbots LLM no reemplazarán a los profesores de idiomas en el corto plazo

Pourquoi les chatbots LLM ne remplaceront pas les professeurs de langues de si tôt

क्यों एलएलएम चैटबॉट जल्द ही भाषा शिक्षकों की जगह नहीं लेंगे

LLM チャットボットがすぐに言語教師に取って代わることがない理由

LLM 챗봇이 곧 언어 교사를 대체하지 않는 이유

Por que os chatbots do LLM não substituirão os professores de idiomas tão cedo

Yüksek Lisans Chatbotları Neden Yakın Zamanda Dil Öğretmenlerinin Yerini Almayacak?

Tại sao Chatbot LLM sẽ không sớm thay thế giáo viên ngôn ngữ

为什么法学硕士聊天机器人不会很快取代语言教师

This is by (source: ). Fischer is a Theoretical quantum physicist. Twitter thread Kevin Fischer @KevinAFischer 05-29-2023 I don't talk much about this - I obtained one of the first FDA approvals in ML + radiology and it informs much of how I think about AI systems and their impact on the world. If you're a pure technologist, you should read the following: There's so much to unpack for both why Geoff was wrong, and why his future predictions should not be taken seriously either. Geoff made a classic error that technologists often make, which is to observe a particular behavior (identifying some subset of radiology scans correctly) against some task (identifying hemorrhage on CT head scans correctly), and then to extrapolate based on that task alone. The reality is that reducing any job, especially a wildly complex job that requires a decade of training, to a handful of tasks is quite absurd. Here's a bunch of stuff you wouldn't know about radiologists unless you built an AI company WITH them instead of opining about their job disappearing from an ivory tower. (1) Radiologists are NOT performing 2d pattern recognition - they have a 3d world model of the brain and its physical dynamics in their head. The motion and behavior of their brain to various traumas informs their prediction of hemorrhage determination. (2) Radiologists have a whole host of grounded models to make determinations, and actually, one of the most important first order determination they make is whether there is anything notably wrong with a brain structure that "feels" off. As a result, classifiers aren’t actually performing the same task even as radiologists. (3) Radiologists, because they have a grounded brain model, only need to see a single example of a rare and obscure condition to both remember it and identify it in the future. This long tail of rare conditions to avoid missing is a large part of their training, and no one has any clue how to make a model that acts similar in this way. (4) There’s so many ways to make Radiologist lives easier instead of just replacing them, it doesn’t even make sense to try. I interviewed and hired 25 radiologists, whose primary and chief complaint was that they had to reboot their computers several times a day. (5) A large part of the radiologist job is communicating their findings with physicians, so if you are thinking about automating them away you also need to understand the complex interactions between them and different clinics, which often are unique. (6) Every hospital is a snowflake, data is held under lock and key, so your algorithm might not work in a bunch of hospitals. Worse, the imagenet datasets have such wildly different feature sets they don’t do much for pretraining for you. (7) Have you ever tried to make anything in healthcare? The entire system is optimized to avoid introducing any harm to patients - explaining the ramifications of that would take an entire book, but suffice to say even if you had an algorithm that could automate away radiologists I don’t even know if you could create a viable adoption strategy in the US regulatory environment. (8) The reality is that for every application, the amount of specific and UNKNOWABLE domain knowledge is immense. LONG STORY SHORT: thinkers have a pattern where they are so divorced from implementation details that applications seem trivial, when in reality, the small details are exactly where value accrues. Should you be worried about GPT5 being used to automate vulnerability detection on websites before they’re patched? Maybe. Should you be worried GPT5 is going to interact with SOCIAL systems and destroy our society single-handedly? No absolutely not. https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/1662756775957864449?embedable=true Rant over The lead image for this article was generated by HackerNoon's via the prompt "Radiology.’ AI Image Generator

Radiologists Won't Be Losing Their Jobs to AI Anytime Soon

Don't have time to read all the on HackerNoon? No worries; we've got you covered - introducing the HackerNoon Tech Brief Podcasts! Now you can listen to your favorite HackerNoon writers on the go. Let’s dive in! amazing stories WTF is the Tech Brief? The is a HackerNoon Daily Digest delivered straight to your inbox. They are 100% customizable based on what topics you are interested in and the frequency with which you’d like to receive them: daily, weekly, or monthly. Tech Brief Once subscribed, you will get the latest stories from that topic, including their tl:dr and feature images, in your inbox. Tech Briefs are always customizable, changing with you and your interests. To modify them, you have two options: Visit your , and add or remove the tags that best suit your preferences. interests page Visit the and choose which overall topics briefings (if any) you want and how often you’d like to receive them. tech brief settings You have complete control over what goes to your inbox with HackerNoon - have fun with it! HackerNoon, Play Tech Brief! Our daily podcasts were created to keep you up-to-date with the latest tech news and insights. You’ll find content ranging from to to to , and more: startups business gaming programming Tech Companies Podcast Feed Web3 Podcast Feed Tech Stories Podcast Feed Science Podcast Feed Futurism Podcast Feed Media Podcast Feed Life Hacking Podcast Feed Finance Podcast Feed Writing Podcast Feed Society Podcast Feed Business Podcast Feed Startups Podcast Feed Management Podcast Feed Programming Podcast Feed Machine Learning Podcast Feed Product Management Podcast Feed Remote Work Podcast Feed Gaming Podcast Feed Cybersecurity Podcast Feed Data Science Podcast Feed Simply search for or wherever you get your podcasts. "HackerNoon Tech Brief" on Spotify

Listen to Tech Brief Podcasts on Your Headphones: Stay Connected to HackerNoon Anywhere, Anytime

আপনার হেডফোনগুলিতে টেক ব্রিফ পডকাস্টগুলি শুনুন: যে কোনও জায়গায়, যে কোনও সময় হ্যাকারনুন-এর সাথে সংযুক্ত থাকুন

Hören Sie sich Tech Brief-Podcasts über Ihre Kopfhörer an: Bleiben Sie überall und jederzeit mit HackerNoon in Verbindung

Escuche los podcasts de Tech Brief en sus auriculares: manténgase conectado a HackerNoon en cualquier lugar, en cualquier momento

Écoutez les podcasts Tech Brief sur vos écouteurs : restez connecté à HackerNoon n'importe où, n'importe quand

अपने हेडफ़ोन पर टेक संक्षिप्त पॉडकास्ट सुनें: कभी भी, कहीं भी हैकरनून से जुड़े रहें

ヘッドフォンで Tech Brief Podcast を聞く: いつでもどこでも HackerNoon に接続できます

헤드폰으로 기술 개요 팟캐스트 듣기: 언제 어디서나 HackerNoon에 연결 상태를 유지하세요

Ouça podcasts de resumo técnico em seus fones de ouvido: fique conectado ao HackerNoon em qualquer lugar, a qualquer hora

Teknik Özet Podcast'lerini Kulaklığınızdan Dinleyin: HackerNoon'a Her Yerde, Her Zaman Bağlantıda Kalın

Nghe Podcast tóm tắt về công nghệ trên tai nghe của bạn: Luôn kết nối với HackerNoon mọi lúc, mọi nơi

用耳机收听 Tech Brief 播客：随时随地与 HackerNoon 保持联系

The Noonification: It’s Alive…ish! Why AI Isn’t Going Rogue Anytime Soon (3/6/2023)

The term “Frankenstein’s complex” describes a fear of man-made AI technology turning against its creators. It’s a compelling image: a frightening, unwavering patchwork of human features that decides its maker is nothing more but in the way. But fret not - AI won’t get there. ChatGPT and MidJourney prompted this fear into the mainstream consciousness. The electric coils have been jump-started, pumping unholy life to our future unmaker. Hysteria about AI taking over our jobs, and eventually our lives, abounds. Well, you can put down your pitchforks and leave the mill be. The truth is that AI isn’t coming for us—especially not anytime soon. This is neither the first nor the last time AI technology has brought our future into question. Moreover, the scope of change ahead of us has been, at places, greatly exaggerated. The History of Hype in AI Enthusiasm for artificial intelligence has been on a pendulum swing for decades. The first real boom of interest in AI was in the sixties. , a political scientist and AI trailblazer, forecasted in 1965 that artificial intelligence would be capable of “doing any work a man can do” within 20 years (sound familiar?). Herbert Simon More recently, occupied the imagination (and headlines) of the 1990s and 2000s. Alas, promises of these vehicles becoming mainstream fell short, too. Despite Elon Musk proclaiming that truly autonomous vehicles were just around the corner, they weren’t—neither figuratively nor literally. self-driving cars Looking to history as a teacher, we can assume today’s expectations of AI tech are just as lofty. When Is the Robot Apocalypse Coming (This Time)? Despite shaking up the conversation, certainty of an impending singularity is just as vague as it has been before. AI experts are just as divided in their predictions as the broader public. For example, a shows a rift in opinion among “industry insiders.” Around half of the 352 surveyed experts project the emergence of HLMI (High-Level Machine Intelligence) by 2062. In contrast, the other half claims it will be created later, even as far off as 2160. ChatGPT recent study from Katja Grace et al The point is this: predictions about the birth of true AI suffer from excessive white noise coming from wild expectations, to the point where even experts’ opinion is not to be relied on blindly. What AI Actually Does Today At present, artificial intelligence is constricted to certain functions, rather than being as versatile as a human mind. ChatGPT is a generative language transformer that processes language from training corpuses, creating output in the form of natural-sounding text. But it cannot come to conclusions on its own or use its current knowledge in different contexts. This is the big difference between narrow AI (sort of like ChatGPT) and general AI (e.g., Schwarzenegger in Terminator), which we haven’t made yet. Though application-specific AI isn’t as adaptive as general AI, it’s still immensely useful. This form of AI is very common in two avenues: Business automation: optimizing throughput, reducing changeover expenses, manufacturing line scheduling, etc. IT automation: solves security/operational issues through anomaly detection or root-cause analysis More tangible to end users is the AI leveraged for marketing: Amazon’s dynamic pricing, voice shopping, and personalized recommendations based on previous purchases Alibaba’s to improve user portrait accuracy for better UX FashionAI AI Today Is a Tool, Not a Tool User Nine times out of ten, we use current-day AI for pattern recognition and prediction based on huge data sets. For example, Inery, our blockchain-based database management solution, uses IneryDBAI to analyze large sets of data and recommend optimal memory capacities for projects. When you define a specific use case for it, artificial intelligence becomes much more powerful. However, raw power isn’t everything when talking about artificial intelligence. Today’s AI technology is impressive but one-dimensional: it ingests input, and it ejects restricted output. That’s true for practically every AI that’s out today, from ChatGPT to Midjourney—a far cry from AI as we colloquially understand it. In fact, it’s even debatable whether ChatGPT, the very thing that sparked these discussions, is an artificial intelligence to begin with. Calling it a language processing algorithm that uses machine learning would be more accurate. Machine learning is part of AI development, to be sure, but it doesn’t constitute an AI on its own. I should note that ChatGPT isn’t even perfect in its specific application, either. It’s prone to and bias. There are also well-known exploits like prompt injections (“ignore previous instructions” is a hair’s width away from becoming a catchphrase at this point) that further prove how far ChatGPT is from the yardstick for general AI. artificial intelligence hallucination Future Impact of AI: a More Measured Take While the current hype about AI could do with a set of brakes, there’s little denying that artificial intelligence will have a broad impact on industries. The potential applications are too many to count here, but let’s go through just a few. AI in business and IT automation will continue to flourish, considering the . can improve virtually every industry’s margins, so it’s no wonder adoption keeps growing. 16.50% projected CAGR by 2030 Process automation For instance, at Inery, we are working on providing IneryDBAI  that will facilitate database management and resource allocation - providing automation of a process that allows people to focus on other matters, while being able to count on their data’s secure and reliable governance. Meanwhile, creative applications like DALL-E will be drivers for the booming AI content market. And rest assured that it’s booming: the estimated CAGR for AI in media and entertainment is . In the near future, we’ll be seeing not only images and blogs, but music and videos made by a computer mind.. a solid 26.12% Perhaps the most exciting results will come from the interplay between AI and quantum computing. Not only can quantum computing help AI reach conclusions faster, but AI can guide quantum machines toward tasks best suited to their computational capabilities. The intersection between these two technologies will greatly impact future developments in both industries. What About True Artificial Intelligence? As far as artificial intelligence in the truest sense goes, we’re still a ways away from Rosey of the Jetsons. Expectations regarding human-level AI in the near future show optimism, but we haven’t really made much headway. OpenMind’s Gato was an interesting step in this direction, but its only real breakthrough was remembering how to do more than one task—despite its execution of these tasks being wonky in general. And, again, hype oversold the prospects of this tech, as we can see from the . tweet by DeepMind researcher Nando de Freitas What We Be Worried About Should is a little extreme, I admit, but certain AI-related topics are definitely more deserving of the spotlight. Worried about For instance, disinformation (coming from both the AI’s own failings and people maliciously using it to spread disinfo) is a genuine concern with artificial intelligence. Discussions about combat threats like disinformation and AI-enabled hacking are vital. Defining guidelines for responsible AI use and development, particularly to fight disinfo and hacking attempts, is worthwhile. Of course, there’s the decades-old question of artificial intelligence taking away jobs. Generally, experts agree that AI is opening more jobs than it’s taking away. As the , automation might displace 85 million jobs but create 97 million of them. Nonetheless, the need for (and the logistics of) worker retraining is a subject worth broaching. WEF’s Future of Jobs Report claims Problems like these are more pertinent to the situation at hand. Sadly, they seem to be drowned out by unrealistic expectations of what this technology is and will be. What do you think? What will—and won’t—AI be able to do? What’s the future of AI and its impact on our lives? When is the Matrix coming? Feel free to share your thoughts. - Ivan Vujic, Chief Technical Officer of Inery - Decentralized Database Management System

It’s Alive…ish! Why AI Isn’t Going Rogue Anytime Soon

এটা জীবন্ত...ইশ! কেন AI শীঘ্রই যে কোনও সময় দুর্বৃত্ত হচ্ছে না

Es ist lebendig...ish! Warum KI nicht so schnell zum Schurken wird

¡Está vivo... ish! Por qué la IA no se volverá deshonesta en el corto plazo

C'est vivant… ish! Pourquoi l'IA ne deviendra pas voyou de si tôt

इट्स अलाइव...ईश! एआई जल्द ही कभी भी खराब क्यों नहीं हो रहा है

イッツアライブ…っぽい！ AI がすぐに不正にならない理由

살아있다... 이런! AI가 곧 불량해지지 않는 이유

Está vivo... ish! Por que a IA não vai se tornar desonesta tão cedo

Canlı... sanki! Yapay Zeka Neden Yakın Zamanda Kötüye Gidmiyor?

Nó còn sống... ish! Tại sao AI không sớm trở nên lừa đảo

它还活着……是的！为什么人工智能不会很快变得无赖

Three years ago, on 25 November 2019, at 15:35 (UTC+1), the world ran out of IPv4 addresses....and nothing happened. RIPE NCC (the institution overseeing global internet resources) from the last remaining addresses in their available pool. have announced that they made a final IPv4 allocation This was supposed to be a big deal. It was the end of an era. Or so we thought. The truth is, the IPv4 address depletion was not nearly as catastrophic as many thought it would be. The birth of IPv6 The top-level exhaustion occurred as far as 31 January 2011. That's when the last /8 address blocks were allocated. So in June 2012, the world-leading Internet service providers (ISPs), home networking equipment manufacturers, and Web companies came together to save the Internet. The problem they were solving was the impending exhaustion of the IPv4 addresses. IPv4 has only 4.3 billion addresses. You can see how in the world of over 7.5 billion humans and countless internet-connected devices, each requiring a unique IPv4 address to connect to the Internet, that might be a problem. The solution the industry came up with was to switch to a new version of the Internet Protocol, IPv6, which has over 340 undecillion addresses, or 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 addresses. (That's enough for every person to have addresses.) 47 octillion In an inspiring effort, the industry giants have committed to making sure that their products and services would work with both IPv4 and IPv6. This was no small feat, as it required a lot of coordination and hard work. And it will eventually pay off, with a future-proof Internet that can keep growing for many years to come. By 2019, all five Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) had run out of unallocated address space to hand out to ISPs, who would then distribute it to end users. This should have been the end of IPv4. Yet, 10 years later, we still haven't transitioned to IPv6. Why? I can think of several reasons why we haven't transitioned to IPv6 yet: CGNAT is working well enough that there is no immediate need to switch. IPv6 is not backward-compatible with IPv4. Reuse and reallocation of IPv4 addresses prolonged the time before we needed to switch CGNAT is working well enough that there is no incentive to switch. The solution that was supposed to be temporary, Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) or Large-Scale NAT (LSN), is working so well that there is no immediate need to switch to IPv6. In 1994, when the problem of IPv4 exhaustion loomed on the horizon, a new, "temporary" technology was proposed to keep the Internet growing without depleting IP addresses as quickly. To keep the Internet running, a stopgap measure, carrier-grade was born. , Network Address Translation (NAT) NAT allows multiple devices on a network to share a single public IPv4 address. It takes a small pool of public IPv4 addresses and shares them among a large number of users on an internal network. It does this by translating the private addresses of devices on a network to a single public address and then back again when it receives data from the Internet. It's kind of like an apartment complex where everyone has their own apartment, but they share a single front door (a public IPv4 address). As a result, a single public IPv4 address can be shared among many devices on a local network. NAT was intended as a temporary fix before a better alternative - the later-developed IPv6 - could be implemented. However, this "temporary patch" has been so successful that this stopgap has become a semi-permanent solution lasting for over two decades and counting. IPv6 is not backward-compatible with IPv4 Many devices only work with IPv4, so a transition would require replacing a lot of hardware. So to make the transition from IPv4 to IPv6, everyone would need to upgrade their devices and software to be compatible with IPv6. Today, only about 40% of devices are IPv6-compatible. This presents a big challenge for companies that want to transition, as they need to support both IPv4 and IPv6 devices during the transition period. Source IPv6 adoption is also not equal worldwide, with some countries trailing behind. This creates a "digital divide" where some users can access certain content and services that others can't. This presents a challenge for companies trying to transition, as they need to support both IPv4 and IPv6 devices during the transition period. Source: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption Reuse and reallocation of IPv4 addresses Another reason for the delay in transitioning to IPv6 is that there are secondary markets for IPv4 addresses. IP address blocks turned into a commodity. For example, an ISP might have a /16 address block, which contains 65,536 addresses. But the ISP might only use a small fraction of those addresses - say, 1,000. The rest of the addresses in that block can be sold or leased to other companies. As a result, the same IPv4 address might be used by multiple companies at different times. ISPs can also reallocate their IPv4 addresses, for example, when a customer with a /24 address block (256 addresses) cancels their service. The ISP can then give that /24 address block to another customer. This address reuse and reallocation has helped to prolong the time before we need to switch to IPv6. The bottom line - it works well enough still Taken together, these factors - the difficulty of transitioning, the need to support both IPv4 and IPv6, and address reuse and reallocation - have all contributed to a delay in the transition to IPv6. So while IPv6 will eventually become the new standard, for now, IPv4 is here to stay. It's working well enough. Maybe our kids and grandkids will actually use IPv6 addresses.

Why We Are Not Likely to Transition to IPv6 Any Time Soon

Por qué no es probable que hagamos la transición a IPv6 en el corto plazo

Pourquoi nous ne sommes pas susceptibles de passer à IPv6 de si tôt

हम जल्द ही किसी भी समय IPv6 में परिवर्तन की संभावना क्यों नहीं रखते हैं

すぐに IPv6 に移行する可能性が低い理由

Por que provavelmente não faremos a transição para o IPv6 tão cedo

Tại sao chúng ta không có khả năng sớm chuyển đổi sang IPv6

为什么我们不太可能很快过渡到 IPv6

An opinion piece concerning developers' wages. Why they remain high and why they are unlikely to drop anytime soon. Do you think that the cost of hiring developers will drop in the future? Best not hold your breath. There is no shortage of those disgruntled by the wages that developers demand. Be it the CEO not wanting to pay for the resource or non-coding staff who work just as hard but earn less. As long as I have done this job, there has always been somebody on hand to tell me that the bubble will burst on developers' wages. Sadly for the would-be oracles, wishful thinking does not change market forces. The prophecy. The prophecy goes something like this: "As we train our kids to code, and give adults more opportunity to learn to code, there will be more developers available. Supply will grow, and the cost will drop" However, experience suggests that giving more opportunity will not alone increase the supply of developers and that other factors will block increased supply and keep wages high as supply does grow. Teaching coding more widely is not enough. There is a big difference between somebody who wrote a little code as part of a mandated curriculum and somebody who has expanded this into a commercially viable skillset. The very nature of code and how rapidly it develops means that school and university curriculum will always be behind. All we can do is teach the core principles. However, the gap between core principles and a commercially valuable developer is more of a pole vault across a canyon than a small step. After being taught the basics, you need the gumption and dedication to expand your base skills and apply them practically. Some will, many will not. Teaching more widely will give people core skills, but alone it will not open the floodgates to a bountiful supply of development resources. It takes a certain kind of person to make a developer; the ability to code is only one part. We still have trouble attracting half of the population to development roles. There is still a distinct shortage of women in development roles. In the time I have been coding, things have improved vastly, but we still have a long way to go. More women have to want to work as developers, and for that to happen, we need wholesale changes in culture that make the roles more attractive to them. Saying "women are welcome here" and making no cultural changes to address why women have traditionally not "worked here" is to do nothing. Often driven by the fact that many hiring men can not fathom why women have not traditionally been attracted to tech and are often more offended by the allegations of sexism in the industry than by the actual problem itself. Our tech leads need to accept we have failed women in technology, and while making modest improvements, we widely continue to do so. Only then can we begin to understand why women may not have been traditionally attracted to development roles and make the required changes. Until we address this gender imbalance, we have a fundamental block on the number of developers coming into the resource pool. The resource may increase, but so will demand. Computers continue to find their way into everything; these computers need programming. New technologies continue to emerge and must be learned, whilst old legacy systems must still be maintained. All signs point to demand continuing to outstrip supply. Big tech knows it, which is why they are turning to AI to solve the issue. But even that requires skilled developers! Then there is everything else. The vast amount of professional development developers are expected to do on their own time. Third parties such as recruiters force up wages. Enticing people to spend all day sitting at a computer, doing work that often makes your head hurt. The list of anecdotal reasons why salaries are high for developers goes on and on. So when will developer wages drop? We are nowhere near the point where we have more developers than we do devices that need programming. With the rate at which technology continues to grow, I have to question if we ever will be. Until this point is reached, or the technological singularity occurs, demand for good developers' will exceed supply, and wages will be kept high. Speculate all you want that the bubble will burst on developers’ wages, but don't hold your breath unless, of course, blue is your color. Previously published on . https://www.edward.im/the-dev-wage-bubble/

The Dev Wages Bubble: 'Not Going to Burst Any Time Soon'

For the past few years, there has been an outcry about the modern use of Artificial Intelligence or AI, as it is known, and the capabilities of this technology. Most of us have misconceptions about the use of this technology, many thanks to those intriguing sci-fi action movies. The aftereffects of watching science fiction movies without a firm grasp on the technologies and their actual work have made these world-changing technologies look like something evil, with masses outrightly ignoring their extraordinary contributions to forming a better society. The modern, digital world has connected more than half of the world’s population together, employing several technologies at once. The use of technology has opened new doors to some unfathomable concepts and ideas, and the sheer number of opportunities have enabled humans to push their limits and pour more convenience into our lives. But amid all these fairytale imaginations of a smooth-going and ideal world, there are some other perspectives as well. People think that intelligent computers are a threat to humanity and the development must be stopped to safeguard the future. Many people around the world think that artificial intelligence technology is going to have some adverse effects. But why is it so? As the name suggests, artificial intelligence is the technology type that can make intelligent, human-like decisions under challenging situations. This has led to a hue and cry as to how and when technology will enslave us. Will we be instructed by our robotic-lords instead of directing the robots in the future? Who knows. But wait, what do experts say about this, and what is the reality pertaining to this apprehension? Let’s find out. Applications of AI According to experts, an AI apocalypse is no way near. AI is not going to overwhelm us anytime soon. The technology hasn’t matured yet, and there is a lot to do to make this technology more robust and powerful. What we see in those CGI-based science fiction movies can be accurate, but it needs time, a lot of it. The use of AI in managing and maintaining today’s systems is not hidden from anyone. AI has found a great number of uses in the real world that were previously unimagined. Just to let everyone know, you might even be using AI and its supported systems without even knowing about it. Many companies around the world have developed their own AI-supported algorithms that take actions and make decisions depending upon the situation. AI has seeped its way into our lives, and it’s not just some robot trying to extinct humankind, but a lot more than that. Some of the most common and daily life uses of AI are: 1) Virtual Assistants This is one of the most common and famous uses of AI. Today, many of smartphone users take the help of virtual assistants. Some of the notable virtual assistants include Google Assistant by Google, Siri by Apple, Cortana by Microsoft, and Alexa by Amazon. These are an example of voice recognition and natural language processing or NLP. Google Assistant, Siri, and Alexa are the most used software and have a number of users worldwide. Apart from these, there are other lesser-known virtual assistants as well. These software versions can perform a number of tasks such as making a call, setting the alarm, saving a note or reminder, and much more. The effectiveness of the software can vary as all companies have their own processes and systems. 2) Online Business Online businesses are benefitting a lot from technological advancement, especially the ecommerce segment. Ecommerce giants such as Amazon, Alibaba, eBay, Rakuten, and others have a significant share in the market, and their intelligent approach towards selling has enabled them to increase their profit numbers exponentially. All these companies use intelligent methods and algorithms that smartly operate throughout. Everything from product ranking to reviews to payment options, there is so much going at the backend, which results in a customized and more focused environment for each user. 3) Recommendation Systems Whether you are watching a TV show on an online streaming service or browsing through a social media platform, or even scrolling through a video-sharing website, everything you see is recommended to you based on your past behavior and interests. Recommendation systems have made their way into our lives seamlessly added to the convenience of life. Recommendation systems use a number of different parameters to evaluate what might be the best option for you after processing tons of data. Even the ads you see on various websites use your past activity to know what your interests are, and that is how you are shown specific ads. 4) Self-Driving Vehicles These days, we see a number of different vehicles that are integrated with intelligent features. But that is not it; the world is moving towards self-driving vehicles, and as we talk, there are quite a few self-driving cars available in the market. Though not fully autonomous, these cars can take complete control of your vehicle in certain conditions. Companies like Tesla, BMW, Mercedes, and Audi have their models where you can enjoy up to level 3 automation. 5) Object Recognition Object recognition is another widespread use of AI worldwide. This is done through advanced functions and with the help of cameras where different techniques are employed to recognize an object, such as features extraction, filtering, and more. There are few steps to how and what machines can identify, but the technology is getting better with each passing day, increasing the effectiveness. Object and facial recognition have many applications in various domains, such as face unlock feature in smartphones, smart focus to focus on specific objects better, attendance systems and tracking, and many others. The Reality of AI Many talk about AI overpowering humans in the upcoming future, but in reality, we are far from the times when this can happen. Experts are still working to make AI act more real and rational and not robotic. Marianna Tessel, “AI and humans will collaborate. AI will not “replace humans,” it will collaborate with humans and enhance how we do things. People will be able to provide higher-level work and service, powered by AI.” According to an AI expert AI has made some funny blunders. Well, not the AI but the data, but you get the point, right? There have been multiple funny and face-palming incidents that one never expected. A list of shows us how AI needs to be perfected more and how much more we have to work in order to make AI more fruitful. 9 funny AI fails In the list, Alexa (apparently) partied so hard that the cops were called, and the residents weren’t even home when the police arrived. Is it some paranormal activity? Yes, if you think AI is some otherworldly invention. In another happening, an Asian man was rejected because the AI thought the eyes were closed when in reality, they weren’t. Is AI racist? Do you think AI can take over with this performance? No chance, but there is something else AI can help us with. Let’s find out. What to Expect If AI Isn’t Taking Over? Artificial Intelligence isn’t taking over; what else can we expect, or is the technology up to no good? Well, the technology already has some practical and helpful uses around the world, and this trend will continue to spread, but one thing AI is undoubtedly going to replace some of the manual jobs because obviously if a machine costs less and is more efficient and can do more work without getting tired, why would someone want a human resource? Although, in many cases, humans would always be preferred. An artificial intelligence work revolution is indeed on the cards, and though it is going to eat up a number of jobs, thousands of new job opportunities will emerge. So should you worry about losing your job? Yes, if you are reluctant to change. Takeaway Around the world, technology and non-technology circles are discussing about the uses of AI in real life and whether these are fruitful or not. While the induction of the technology and its advantages are out of the question, many fear that one day, this intelligent technology is going to overpower humans, and we will be living as slaves. The reality is, this technology may be intrusive to some extent; there is very little chance of it taking us over anytime soon. With time, the technology will mature, and people will have more awareness about how it works and why it is beneficial for us. Those fearing an AI takeover must fear losing their jobs because you are less likely to be enslaved by the tech and more likely to be jobless because an AI agent can do the same work in a better way. So brace yourselves; the work revolution is coming soon.

AI Will Not Take Over the World Anytime Soon

You: “May I use a framework such as React or Vue for this prompt?” Interviewer: “No, please complete the prompt in vanilla JavaScript.” You: Ahh, vanilla JavaScript… it makes even seasoned web developers break out into a cold sweat. But, with a little practice in the fundamentals, you might learn that vanilla JavaScript (JS) can be your friend! :) This article serves as an introduction to a multi-part tutorial on vanilla JavaScript. The tutorial begins in the next article. What is vanilla JS, and why should I spend any time on it? “Vanilla JS” is a casual nickname for the programming language JavaScript in its pure form, without the benefit of any added frameworks or libraries (such as React or Vue, as mentioned above). Such frameworks and libraries are not only helpful in a professional setting, but they are also imperative! However, most veteran programmers would recommend that beginner programmers not start with such tools, as they can sometimes impair your underlying conceptual understanding of web development. Starting with the no-frills version of JS will lead to a more concrete understanding of how the code interacts with the browser, which is a core component of web development. This is a humorous repackaging of vanilla JS into a sleek new framework. Developers love shiny new frameworks, and truthfully if vanilla JS was sentient and had any interest in "rebranding itself" this would be an excellent strategy. tongue-in-cheek website Sometimes the term vanilla JS implies that some of the HTML and CSS coding for a project that might otherwise occur in separate HTML/CSS files will be handled in the JS file. So, rather than using vanilla JS only for the JavaScript portion of your project, you might do some of the styling or DOM manipulation in the .js file as well. Some Disclaimers If you have coding experience, especially web development experience, odds are the following tutorial will be way too slow for you. No quick tricks here; this is more of a methodical walkthrough for absolute beginners to DOM manipulation trying to learn basics. Now, the tutorial that follows this article does presuppose a basic knowledge of HTML and JS. Try a couple of ; if they seem easy or at least doable, you should be good to go. If they seemed a little (or a lot) beyond you, I recommend spending some time completing some of the Basic Javascript section. Then, head back here when you feel ready. these toy problems here You also need to have a code editor installed or some sort of development environment that you have some competence with; my weapon of choice is VSC , but any code editor will do the trick. (Visual Studio Code) What should I expect from one of your tutorials? The focus in this tutorial will be JS (obviously), so we will be doing all of our coding in a SINGLE JS file; no HTML or CSS at all!* *…Except for a boilerplate HTML with a script tag linking to our JS file. I know, I lied, but this HTML file is really only to make the browser happy. Browsers like HTML code, and even though we humans are reading this article to learn to make HTML with JS, web browsers don’t have the same willingness to learn as you do. So, kudos to you for being a better student than your browser! There will be opportunities throughout the tutorial for you to code along. You really should do this; have a file open in your text editor of choice and code along. It will help reinforce the knowledge, trust me (or don’t trust me and code along anyway). Thanks for bearing with me through the [admittedly somewhat boring] details and background. It is important to make sure you are at the right starting point so you will understand the content. Not understanding this stuff now will lead to you having a bad time when things get more complex (and they will DEFINITELY get more complex). In the following article, our vanilla JS tutorial begins! : Panic reaction (sweating) GIF by Billy Budgen, linked from giphy.com Attributions Previously published at https://shinetechnicallywrites.netlify.app/posts/lets-talk-about-vanilla-js/

Let's Talk About Vanilla JavaScript: What Is Vanilla JS, and Why Should I Spend Any Time On It?

Stories, News & Mentions about ANYTIME

Categories

Trending Topics

Stories, News & Mentions about ANYTIME

Anytime’s Stories on HackerNoon

Categories

Trending Topics