paint-brush
Breaking Down the Inductive Proofs Behind Faster Value Iteration in RLby@anchoring

Breaking Down the Inductive Proofs Behind Faster Value Iteration in RL

by AnchoringJanuary 15th, 2025
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Explore how Anchored Value Iteration (Anc-VI) accelerates convergence in dynamic programming and reinforcement learning
featured image - Breaking Down the Inductive Proofs Behind Faster Value Iteration in RL
Anchoring HackerNoon profile picture
0-item

Authors:

(1) Jongmin Lee, Department of Mathematical Science, Seoul National University;

(2) Ernest K. Ryu, Department of Mathematical Science, Seoul National University and Interdisciplinary Program in Artificial Intelligence, Seoul National University.

Abstract and 1 Introduction

1.1 Notations and preliminaries

1.2 Prior works

2 Anchored Value Iteration

2.1 Accelerated rate for Bellman consistency operator

2.2 Accelerated rate for Bellman optimality opera

3 Convergence when y=1

4 Complexity lower bound

5 Approximate Anchored Value Iteration

6 Gauss–Seidel Anchored Value Iteration

7 Conclusion, Acknowledgments and Disclosure of Funding and References

A Preliminaries

B Omitted proofs in Section 2

C Omitted proofs in Section 3

D Omitted proofs in Section 4

E Omitted proofs in Section 5

F Omitted proofs in Section 6

G Broader Impacts

H Limitations

B Omitted proofs in Section 2

First, we prove the following lemma by induction.










Now, we present our key lemmas for the first rate of Theorem 2.




and let U¯ be the entire right hand side of inequality. Then, we have



By induction,



and let U¯ be the entire right hand side of inequality. Then, we have



Now, we prove the first rate of Theorem 2.




where the second inequality is from the condition.


By induction,



and let U¯ be the entire right hand side of inequality. Then, we have



Now, we prove the second rates of Theorem 2.



This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.