paint-brush
Bernstein’s Concentration Inequality In Equivalence Testingby@computational

Bernstein’s Concentration Inequality In Equivalence Testing

tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

The paper provides Proof of Claim using concentration inequality.
featured image - Bernstein’s Concentration Inequality In Equivalence Testing
Computational Technology for All HackerNoon profile picture

Authors:

(1) Diptarka Chakraborty, National University of Singapore, Singapore

(2) Sourav Chakraborty, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata;

(3) Gunjan Kumar, National University of Singapore, Singapore;

(4) Kuldeep S. Meel, University of Toronto, Toronto.

Abstract and 1 Introduction

2 Notations and Preliminaries

3 Related Work

4 An Efficient One-Round Adaptive Algorithm and 4.1 High-Level Overview

4.2 Algorithm Description

4.3 Technical Analysis

5 Conclusion

6 Acknowledgements and References

A Missing Proofs

B An O(log log n)-query fully adaptive algorithm

A MISSING PROOFS


Therefore, by additive Chernoff bound (Lemma 2.3), the value et = EstTail(D, i, S, β, b, m) returned by the algorithm satisfies



To prove Claims 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12, we will use the following concentration inequality that directly follows from Bernstein’s concentration inequality.








This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED license.